Polemics with Lucio Russo

• Autorzy: Kosciuszko K.
• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The author evaluates Russo's ideas from postmodernist position. Contrary to L. Russo, who emphasizes the continuity and the commensurability in the history of science, he suggests that one should stress also discontinuity and incommensurability. Russo loses what is new and different in relation to Hellenistic science. He interprets the history of science as a repetition of the same Hellenistic paradigm. In his work, there is no emergence of novelty. From the other side, criticizing his exaggeratedly formalistic point of view, the author refers to the arguments of Heyting, Brouwer and I. Lakatos.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

HELLENISTIC SCIENCE; HISTORY OF SCIENCE; RUSSO LUCIO

• Wydawca: Science Studies Committee, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: 43
• Numer: 2(172)
• Strony: 287-292
• Rodzaj publikacji: ARTICLE

Twórcy

autor

Kosciuszko K.

• K. Kosciuszko, Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski, Instytut Filozofii, ul. Oczapowskiego 4, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland

Identyfikatory

CEJSH db identifier

07PLAAAA03196609