Nowa wersja platformy jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 7 | nr 3 | 222-239
Tytuł artykułu

Inequality and Wealth Creation in Ancient History : Malthus' Theory Reconsidered

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The main purpose of this paper is to propose the hypothesis that inequality was essential for the sustainability and 'development' of early agriculturally based societies that developed in Prehistory and Ancient History. This was so for varied reasons: there was a need for some members of societies - the dominant class also called the elite - to escape from the Malthusian trap. In most cases, agriculture produced a bigger economic surplus eventually. Managerial problems - such as the ones associated with storage, the division of labor, irrigation, trade - being part of the consequences of the Neolithic revolution, created pressures to develop more centralized political organizations, a process which led later to the formation of the early states. This process allowed the appearance of powerful local chiefs who changed the nature of their original communities with new forms of social organization, in which one individual and his enlarged family - transformed into a ruling elite - received the benefits of the labor of a large number of serfs belonging to less-favored communities in neighboring areas. Although the surplus appropriated by the elite was used in specific ways - consumption, investments and expenditures on armed forces - it increased the power and wealth of these societies, albeit a solution involving unequally distributed wealth. While this is not the only factor in the growing dominance of agriculturally based societies, it is one of main ones as is evidenced by considering six early civilizations resulting from the Neolithic revolution. This result involves an important modification of Malthus' theory. However, inequality - though necessary - was not a sufficient condition for the sustainability and economic development of these early societies. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Université de La Réunion, France
  • The University of Queensland, Australia
  • Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, Crown Publishers, New York.
  • Ashraf, Q. and Galor, O. (2011), Dynamics and stagnation in the Malthusian epoch, American Economic Review, 101(5), pp. 2003-41.
  • Bender, B. (1978), Gatherer hunter to farmer: a social perspective, World Archaeology 10, pp. 204-22.
  • Bertola, G., R. Foellmi and Zweimuller, J. (2006), Income Distribution in Macroeconomic Models, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
  • Bockstette, V., Chanda, A. and Putterman, L. (2002), States and markets: the advantage of an early start, Journal of Economic Growth, 7(4), pp. 347-69.
  • Bolt, J. and van Zanden, J. L. (2013), The First Update of the Maddison Project; Reestimating Growth Before 1820, Maddison-Project Working Paper, Nr. 4. Available at (Accessed May 2014).
  • Boserup, E. (1965), The Conditions for Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change Under Population Pressure, Aldine, Chicago.
  • Brenner, R. (1976), Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe, Past and Present, 70(1), pp. 30-75.
  • Childe, G. (1936), Man Makes Himself, Watts & Co., London. Reprint (4thedn.) Collins, London, 1965.
  • Clark, G. (2007), Farewell to Alms. A Brief Economic History of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Diamond, J. (1997), Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, W. W. Norton, New York.
  • Galor, O. (2005), From stagnation to growth: unified growth theory, In P. Aghion and S. N. Durlauf (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1A, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 171-193.
  • Galor, O., Moav, O. and Vollrath, D. (2009), Inequality in land ownership, the emergence of human capital promoting institutions and the great divergence, Review of Economic Studies, 76, pp. 143-179.
  • Hayden, B. (1990), Nimrods, piscators, pluckers, and planters: the emergence of food production, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 9, pp. 31-69.
  • Maddison, A. (2007), Contours of the World Economy 1-2030 AD, Oxford U.P., Oxford.
  • Milanovic, B., Lindert, P. H. and Williamson, J. G. (2007), Measuring Ancient Inequality, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 13550. Available at
  • North, D. C. and Thomas, R. P. (1977), The first economic revolution, The Economic History Review, Second Series, 30, pp. 229-41.
  • Persson, K. G. (2008), The Malthus Delusion, European Review of Economic History, 12(2), pp. 165-173.
  • Postan, M. M. (1973), The Medieval Economy and Society: An Economic History of Britain in the Middle Ages, 1100-1500,University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
  • Price, T. D., and Brown, J. (1985), Prehistoric Hunter-gatherers: The Emergence of Cultural Complexity, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
  • Renfrew, C. and Bahn, P. (2012), Archaeology Theories, Methods and Practice, Thames and Hudson, 6th edition, London.
  • Rowthorn, R. and Seabright, P. (2010), Property Rights, Warfare and the Neolithic Transition, IDEI Working Paper, No. 654, November, Available at
  • Tisdell, C.A. (2005), Economics of Environmental Conservation (2ndedn), Edward Elgar, Northampton, USA.
  • Tisdell, C.A. (2013), Competition, Diversity and Economic Performance, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.