Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Some philosophers and theologians have argued that God-centeredness cannot be a condition of inter-religious dialogue for at least four reasons. First, it is an existential fact that all religions tend to view the truth of their beliefs and values as absolute. Sec- ond, all religions are embedded in radically different cultural contexts; this kind of dif- ference undercuts the possibility of inter-religious dialogue. Third, grounding all the religions in a transcendent reality relativizes their beliefs and values. Moreover, people worship “their” God, not a neutral reality. Fourth, it is difficult to ground all the reli- gions in a transcendent, neutral realty. This paper critically evaluates these arguments and defends the proposition that the mystical experience provides a justifiable basis for the claim that the transcendent is not only a wealth of being but also an infinite wealth of being and that the same transcendent is “revealed” in the mystical experience which underlies all the major religions. The transcendent is the common ground on which all the religions stand in inter-religious dialogue qua religions.
Słowa kluczowe
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
89-107
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Millsaps college in Jackson, MS, U.S.A.
Bibliografia
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.desklight-1449b0d9-fd14-4b7f-ac90-c6855784468b