Nowa wersja platformy jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | Vol. 21, No. 4 | 41--57
Tytuł artykułu

Gaming for Peace: gender awareness training and the Polish military

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Despite regulatory and legal changes, women are persistently underrepresented in military organisations on peacekeeping missions. This article argues that part of the reason for this can be found in persistent stereotypical ideas about gender roles, and looks at the attitudes and experience of Polish military personnel who have been deployed on peacekeeping missions as evidence of this. However, witnessing other militaries stance on gender, where such stereotypes are still there, but not as entrenched, can cause personnel to contextualise if not question their own organisation’s stance on gender. Sixteen Polish military peacekeepers were interviewed in-depth about their experiences on peacekeeping missions as part of a European H2020 project, Gaming for Peace (GAP). The interviews were used to build scenarios for a digital role-playing game to develop soft skills among peacekeeping personnel, and these soft skills included gender awareness. This article analyses the interviews to explore the experience of gender for both men and women in the Polish military, and shows that there is an urgent need for the type of training in gender awareness that is part of GAP.

Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 11 poz., rys.
  • 1. Joseph, P. (ed.), 2016. The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives. [online] Available from: les/EUISSFiles/ Alert_3_Gender_0.pdf [Accessed 20 Apr 2018].
  • 2. The Panel on United Nations Peace Operations, chaired by Lakhdar Brahimi, reported to the U.N. Secretary-General on 17 August 2000: U.N. Doc. A/55/305. [online] Available from: [Accessed 20 Apr 2018].
  • 3. Theidon, K. and Phenicie. K. with Murray, E., 2011. Gender, conflict, and peacebuilding state of the fi eld and lessons learned. USIP. [online] Available from: http://www.usip. org/sites/default/fi les/Gender%20confl ict%20and%20peacebuilding.pdf [Accessed 22 Feb 2017].
  • 4. Groothedde, S., 2013. Gender makes sense: A way to improve your mission. Civil-Military Cooperation Centre of Excellence (CCOE). [online] Available from: http://www.cimic- [Accessed 22 Feb 2017].
  • 5. UN DPKO/DFS 2010. Integrating a gender perspective into the work of the United Nations military in peacekeeping operations[online] Available from: military_perspective.pdf [Accessed 22 Feb 2017].
  • 6. United Nations General Assembly 2005. A comprehensive strategy to eliminate future sexual exploitation and abuse in United Nations peacekeeping operations. [online] Available from: [Accessed 22 Feb 2017].
  • 7. Bridgesd D., and Horsfall D., 2009. Increasing Operational Effectiveness in UN Peacekeeping. Toward a Gender-Balanced Force, Armed Forces & Society, 36(1), 120-130.
  • 8. UN Women Sourcebook on Women, Peace and Security 2012, p. 120 [online] Available from: sourcebook-on-women-peace-and-security [Accessed 20 Apr 2018].
  • 9. Sandole S., and Staroste I., 2015. Making the Case for Systemic, Gender-Based Analysis in Sustainable Peace Building. Confl ict Resolution Quarterly, 33(2), 119-147.
  • 10. Garner M., Wagner C. and Kawulich B., 2009. Teaching Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
  • 11. Ashenqeeti, H., 2014. Interviewing as a Data Collection Method; A Critical Review. English Linguistics Research, 3(1).
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.