PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2017 | R. 73, nr 5 | 289--297
Tytuł artykułu

W poszukiwaniu zrównoważonego opakowania ze szczególnym naciskiem na emisję gazów cieplarnianych

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
EN
In search for sustainable packaging with the focus on the emission of greenhouse gases
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca

Rocznik
Strony
289--297
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Vienna Austria;
Bibliografia
  • [1] Twede D. 2007. “The History of corrugated fiberboard shipping containers”, Michigan State University, CHARM 2007, pp. 241-246.
  • [2] Mohan A-M. 2016. “Consumers turn to brands for direction on recycling”, published on Mar 2nd 2016, http://www.greenerpackage.com/.
  • [3] World Business Council for Sustainable Development “Sustainable Consumption – Facts and Trends”, ISBN 978-3-940388-30-8.
  • [4] Danish Ministry of the Enviroment. “ Impact Categories, Normalization, and Weighting in LCA”, Enviromental News, no. 78, 2005.
  • [5] Hansen J. et al. 2010. “Global surface temperature change”, Reviews of Geophysics. 48 (4).
  • [6] European Environment Agency “Observed trends in total global concentration of the Kyoto gases, 1850-2010”. http://www.eea.europa.eu/.
  • [7] Pala C. “Corals tie stronger El Niños to climate change”, Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.aal0486.
  • [8] http://www.kyotoprotocol.com/
  • [9] Mondi Group Sustainable Development Report for 2015. https://www.mondigroup.com/
  • [10] Chapter 5, the course on “Forest Resource Management”, Penn University (USA).
  • [11] “European database for corrugated board lifecycle studies” by CEPI Containerboard and by FEFCO. 2015.
  • [12] “Corrugated packaging life-cycle assessment summary report” by Corrugated Packaging Alliance. 2010. http://www.corrugated.org/.
  • [13] “Analysis of Eurostat packaging recycling data: a study of the years 2006-2012” by Extended Producer Responsibility Alliance EXPRA. 2015. http://www.expra.eu/.
  • [14] Parker L. 2015. “Ocean trash: 5.25 trillion pieces and counting, but big questions remain”, National Geographic (published on Jan 11th 2015).
  • [15] “Enviromental overview: complete life cycle assessment of north American container glass” by Glass Packaging Institute. 2010.
  • [16] Harding K.G. et al. 2007. “Environmental analysis of plastic production processes: Comparing petroleum-based polypropylene and polyethylene with biologically-based poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid using life cycle analysis”. Journal of Biotechnology (130) : 57-66.
  • [17] Korneliusdottir A.M. 2014. “A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of primary aluminium production at Nordural”, Master Thesis, University of Iceland.
  • [18] “Comparative life cycle assessment of reusable plastic containers and display-and non-display-ready corrugated containers used for fresh produce applications” by Franklin Associates. 2016.
  • [19] “LCA comparison of two systems for bread packaging and distribution”. 2008. Research Report no. D2.5.1, by SYKE and by Stora Enso.
  • [20] “Single trip or reusable packaging – considering the right choice for the environment” by WRAP. 2010. ISBN 1-84405- 437-3. www.wrap.org.uk
  • [21] http://www.save-food.org/
  • [22] “New Research shows fruit packed in corrugated is safer and fresher than RPCs” by FEFCO and by the University of Bologna. 2016.
  • [23] “Corrugated packaging is protecting pocket of retailers, Health of Consumers” by Mondi Tire Kutsan and by the Aegean University. 2016.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-33a1e6ea-2f18-4883-8638-ca15e9a78ea8
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.