Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 27 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Measuring the willingness to pay for improved air quality: a contingent valuation surve

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
This study attempts to estimate how much Polish citizens would be willing to pay for clean air by applying a contingent valuation of six damage components using the payment card question format: mortality, morbidity, visibility loss, material damages, damages to cultural heritage, and ecosystem damages. The system of the valuation questions approach helps to avoid an embedding problem. The analysis of protest voters is conducted. Although mortality and morbidity remain the most valuable damage components, the percentage shares of the total willingness to pay are more evenly distributed between all the damage components compared to literature. Damages to ecosystems and cultural heritage compose almost 30% of the total value, and their omission by the literature seriously underestimates total benefits.
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • Wrocław University of Economics, Poland, Komandorska 118/120, 54-345 Wroclaw, Poland
  • 1. PANKOWSKA M., GORCZYCA M. Air protection against pollution - why in Poland you cannot breathe fully? Kontrola Państwowa, 3/362, 60, 2015.
  • 2. Experts: 45 thousand Polish people die due to air pollution each year. Rynek Zdrowia, 5 August 2014, Available online:,144396,8.html (accessed on 18.12.2016).
  • 3. Air quality in Europe – 2016 report, European Environment Agency, 2016, Available online: (accessed on 19.12.2016)
  • 4. THURSTON G.D., KIPEN H., ANNESI-MAESANO I., BALMES J, BROOK R.D., CROMAR K., DE MATTEIS S., FORASTIERE F., FORSBERG B., FRAMPTON M.W., GRIGG J., HEEDERIK D., KELLY F.J., KUENZLI N., LAUMBACH R., PETERS A., RAJAGOPALAN S.T., RICH D., RITZ B., SAMET J.M., SANDSTROM T., SIGSGAARD T., SUNYER J., BRUNEKREEF B. A joint ERS/ATS policy statement: what constitutes an adverse health effect of air pollution? An analytical framework. The European Respiratory Journal, 49/1, 2017.
  • 5. OPREA M., DUNEA D., HAI-YING L. Development of a knowledge based system for analysing particulate matter air pollution effects on human health. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 16/3, 669, 2017.
  • 6. CHEN R., HUB B., LIU Y., HU J., YANG G., HU D., CHEN C. Beyond PM2.5: The role of ultrafine particles on adverse health effects of air pollution BBA – General Subjects, 1860/12, 2844, 2016.
  • 7. VELENTZA O. Particular matters: a threat for human health, Scientific Chronicles, 21/3, 233, 2016.
  • 8. Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution – REVIHAAP Project. WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2013. Available online: (accessed on 18.12.2016).
  • 9. SPIRIĆ V.T., JANKOVIĆ S., VRANES A.J., MAKSIMOVIĆ J., MAKSIMOVIĆ N. The impact of air pollution on chronic respiratory diseases, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 21/2, 481-490, 2012.
  • 10. SAMEK L. Overall human mortality and morbidity due to exposure to air pollution, International Journal of Occupational Medicine & Environmental Health, 29/3, 417, 2016.
  • 11. FENGYING Z., LIPING L., KRAFFT T., LI W., JIANHUI Z., LANYU L., QIAN L., YU S., WUYI W. Time-series study on air pollution and mortality, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 23/5, 1797, 2014.
  • 12. JEDRYCHOWSKI W., MAJEWSKA R., SPENGLER J., CAMANN D., ROEN E., PERERA F. Prenatal exposure to fine particles and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and birth outcomes: a two-pollutant approach, International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health, 90/3, 255-264, 2017.
  • 13. EDWARDS S.C, JEDRYCHOWSKI W., BUTSCHER M., CAMANN D., KIELTYKA A., MROZ E., FLAK E., LI Z., WANG S., RAUH V., PERERA F. Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and children's intelligence at 5 years of age in a prospective cohort study in Poland, Environmental Health Perspectives, 118 (9), 1326, 2010.
  • 14. Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution – REVIHAAP Project. WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2013. Available online: (accessed on 18.12.2016)
  • 15. CHANG T., GRAFF Z.J., GROSS T., NEIDELL M. Particulate pollution and the productivity of pear packers, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8/3, 141, 2016.
  • 16. MAZZANTI M., ZOBOLI R. Environmental efficiency and labour productivity: trade-off or joint dynamics? A theoretical investigation and empirical evidence from Italy using NAMEA, Ecological Economics, 68/4, 1182, 2009.
  • 17. MAJEWSKI G., CZECHOWSKI P.O., BADYDA A., BRANDYK A. Effect of air pollution on visibility in urban conditions. Warsaw case study, Environment Protection Engineering, 40/2, 47-64, 2014.
  • 18. KREISLOVA K., KNOTKOVA D. The results of 45 years of atmospheric corrosion study in the Czech Republic, Materials, 10/4, 1, 2017.
  • 19. TZANIS C., VAROTSOS C., CHRISTODOULAKIS J., TIDBLAD J., FERM M., IONESCU A., LEFEVRE R.-A., THEODORAKOPOULOU K., KREISLOVA K. On the corrosion and soiling effects on materials by air pollution in Athens, Greece, Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics, 11/23, 12039-12048, 2011.
  • 20. TIDBLAD J., HICKS K., KUYLENSTIERNA J., PRADHAN B.B., DANGOL P., MYLVAKANAM I., FERESU S.B., LUNGU C. Atmospheric corrosion effects of air pollution on materials and cultural property in Kathmandu, Nepal, Materials & Corrosion, 67/2, 170, 2016.
  • 21. DE LA FUENTE D., VEGA J.M., VIEJO F., DIAZ I., MORCILLO M. City scale assessment model for air pollution effects on the cultural heritage, Atmospheric Environment, 45/6, 1242-1250, 2011.
  • 22. SEN C. Effect of air pollution on peri-urban agriculture in Varanasi, India, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 22/3, 219, 2010.
  • 23. RAI P.K. Impacts of particulate matter pollution on plants: Implications for environmental biomonitoring, Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, 129, 120, 2016.
  • 24. NAVRUD S.,PRUCKNER G.J. Environmental valuation – to use or not to use? A comparative study of the United States and Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics, 10, 3, 1997.
  • 25. JEŻOWSKI P. ed. Metody szacowania korzyści i strat w dziedzinie ochrony środowiska i zdrowia. Wydawnictwo SGH, Warszawa, 2009.
  • 26. FILIPPINI M., MARTINEZ-CRUZ A.L. Impact of environmental and social attitudes, and family concerns on willingness to pay for improved air quality: a contingent valuation application in Mexico City. Lat Am Econ Rev, 25, 7, 2016.
  • 27. MITCHELL R., CARSON R. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1989.
  • 28. FREEMAN A.M., HERRIGES J.A., KLING C.L. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, Third edition, Resources for the Future, New York, 2014.
  • 29. GARROD G, WILLIS K.G. Economic valuation of the environment: methods and case studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar;1999.
  • 30. CHAU K.W., WONG S.K., CHAN A.T., LAM K. The value of clean air in high-density urban areas. In: YUEN B., YEH A.G.O. (eds) High-rise living in Asian cities. Springer Science and Business Media B.V., New York, 113, 2011.
  • 31. LIGUS M., PETERNEK P. Measuring structural, location and environmental effects: A hedonic analysis of housing market in Wroclaw, Poland. In: KAPOUNEK S., KRUTILOVA V., eds. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences I, 220, 251, 2016.
  • 32. LIGUS M. The assessment of environmental benefits of low-emission electricity generation, the case of Poland. Energy Procedia, 107, 363, 2017.
  • 33. LIGUS M., PETERNEK P. Impacts of urban environmental attributes on residential housing prices in Warsaw (Poland) – Spatial hedonic analysis of city districts. In: JAJUGA K., STAEHR K., ORLOWSKI L.T. Contemporary trends and challenges in finance. Proceedings from the 2nd Wroclaw International Conference in Finance, Springer Proceed. Business, Economics, 155, 2017.
  • 34. FUZYOVA L., LANIKOVA D. NOVOROLSKY M. Economic Valuation of Tatras National Park and Regional Environmental Policc. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 18 (5), 811, 2009.
  • 35. HE J., AI J., ZHU X., SUN X. Ecological Compensation Standards of Wetland Restoration Projects. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24 (6), 2421, 2015.
  • 36. HAUSMAN J. Contingent valuation: from dubious to hopeless, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26/4, 43, 2012.
  • 37. HAAB T.C., INTERIS M.G., PETROLIA D.R., WHITEHEAD J.C Interesting questions worthy of further study: Our reply to Desvousges, Mathews, and Train’s (2015) comment on our thoughts (2013) on Hausman’s (2012) update of Diamond and Hausman’s (1994) critique of contingent valuation, Applied Economic Perspectives & Policy, 38/1, 2016.
  • 38. RIDKER R.G. Economic costs of air pollution. Praeger, New York, 1967.
  • 39. RIDKER R.G., HENNING J.A. The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 246, 1967.
  • 40. ARROW K., SOLOW R., PORTNEY P.R., LEAMER E.E., RADNER R., SCHUMAN H. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation: report to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Federal Register, 58, 4601, 1993.
  • 41. ISTAMTO T., HOUTHUIJS D., LEBERT E. Willingness to pay to avoid health risks from road-traffic-related air pollution and noise across five countries. Science of the Total Environment, 497-498, 420, 2014.
  • 42. LEE Y.J., LIM Y.W., YANG J.Y., KIM C.S., SHIN Y.C., SHIN D.C. Evaluating the PM damage cost due to urban air pollution and vehicle emissions in Seoul, Korea, Journal of Environmental Management, 92/3, 603, 2011.
  • 43. HUANG D., XU J., ZHANG S. Valuing the health risks of particulate air pollution in the Pearl River Delta, China, Environmental Science & Policy, 15/1, 38, 2012.
  • 44. SUN C., YUAN X., XU M. The public perceptions and willingness to pay: from the perspective of the smog crisis in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1635, 2016.
  • 45. GUPTA M. Willingness to pay for carbon tax: a study of Indian road passenger transport, Transport Policy, 45, 46, 2016.
  • 46. GRAVITIANI E., KRISTANTI R.E.W. Adaptation strategy on urban air quality, case study: Semarang urban area, Indonesia, Advances in Economics and Business, 3/2, 57, 2015.
  • 47. BARRINGTON-LEIGH C., BEHZADNEJAD F. Evaluating the short-term cost of low-level local air pollution: a life satisfaction approach. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 18, 1, 2016.
  • 48. MARKANDYA A.; HUNT A., ARIGONI O.R. Willingness to pay for mortality risk reduction associated with air pollution in Sao Paulo, Revista Brasileira de Economia, 63/1, 3-22, 2009.
  • 49. NIELSEN J.S. Approaching the value of a life year - empirical evidence from a Danish contingent valuation survey, Nationalokonomisk Tidsskrift, 148/1, 67, 2010.
  • 50. ISTAMTO T., HOUTHUIJS D., LEBRET E. Multi-country willingness to pay study on road-traffic environmental health effects: are people willing and able to provide a number? Environmental Health, 13, 35, 2014.
  • 51. BERBEKA K., PESZKO G. Monetary valuation of benefits of traffic calming in the old city of Krakow. A contingent valuation study. Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment at the University Collage, London, UK, 1997.
  • 52. DZIEGIELEWSKA D.A., MENDELSOHN R. Valuing Air Quality in Poland. Environmental and Resource Economics, 30, 131, 2005.
  • 53. MARKOWSKA A., MARKIEWICZ O., CZAJKOWSKI M., BARTCZAK A. Polish valuation of life year gained in the context of air pollution. Ekonomia. Rynek, Gospodarka, Społeczeństwo, 19, 194, 2007.
  • 54. MARKOWSKA A., MARKIEWICZ O., CZAJKOWSKI M., BARTCZAK A. DESAIGUES B., AMI D., BRAUN-KOHLOVA M., CHILTON S., FARRERAS V., HUNT A., HUTCHISON M., JEANRENAUD C., KADERJAK P., MACA V., METCALF H., NAVRUD S., NIELSEN J.S., ORTIZ R., PELLEGRINI S., RABL A. Economic valuation of air pollution mortality: A 9-country contingent valuation survey of value of a life year (VOLY). Ecological Indicators, 11 (3), 902, 2011.
  • 55. LIGUS M. Wartościowanie korzyści środowiskowych inwestycji w odnawialne źródła energii w Polsce – badanie pierwotne metodą wyceny warunkowej (Contingent Valuation Method). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 99, 218, 2010.
  • 56. KAHNEMAN D., KNETSCH J.L. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 57, 1992.
  • 57. HOEHN J.P., RANDALL A. Embedding in market demand systems Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 369, 1996.
  • 58. BROOKSHIRE D.S., CROCKER T.D., D’ARGE R.C., SHAUL B.D., KNEESE A.V., SCHULZE W.D., CARLIN A. Methods development for assessing air pollution control benefits. Vol. 2: Experiments in valuing non-market goods: case study of alternative benefits measures of air pollution in south coast basin of Southern California. Prepared for the US EPA, Washington D.C., 1979.
  • 59. McCONNELL K.E. Valuing eastern visibility: a field test of the contingent valuation method. Prepared for Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation, US EPA, 1991.
  • 60. DZIEGIELEWSKA D.A., MENDELSOHN R. Does “No” mean “No”? A protest methodology. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38 (1), 71, 2007.
  • 61. DESVOUSGES W.H., JOHNSON F. R., DUNFORD R. W., BOYLE K. J., HUDSON S. P., WILSON K. N. Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: Tests of validity and reliability. In: J.A. HAUSMAN, ed. Contingent valuation: a critical assessment. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 220, 91. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1993.
  • 62. DELUCCHI M.A., MURPHY J.J., McCUBBIN D.R. The health and visibility cost of air pollution: a comparison of estimation methods. Journal of Environmental Management, 64 (2), 139, 2002.
  • 63. Statystyka stóp procentowych, NBP 2016, Available online: (accessed on 12.01.2017).
  • 64. Szeregi czasowe miar inflacji bazowej w ujęciu miesięcznym i rocznym obejmujące okres od 2001 r. (xls), NBP, 2016, Available online: accessed on 12.01.2017
  • 65. Roczne wskaźniki makroekonomiczne (xls), GUS, 2016, Available online: on 12.01.2017).
  • 66. Benefits and Costs of Clean Air Act 1990-2020. Report Documents and Graphics. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2011, Available online: (accessed on 27.12.2016).
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.