PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2005 | 50 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Size and overlap of home range in Calomys musculinus [Muridae: Sigmodontinae]

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Home range size and overlap ofCalomys musculinus (Thomas, 1913) was examined in relation to sex and breeding periods. The study was carried out in four 0.25 ha enclosures, in a natural pasture, between October 2002 and July 2003. The four enclosures functioned as independent populations and each was considered a replicate. The capture, mark and recapture method was used. Home range size and overlap inC. musculinus depended on sex and period. Home range size of males was always larger than that of females. Females showed a small degree of intra-sexual home range overlap during the breeding period. In general, male home ranges overlapped with females. We conclude that differences in home range size inC. musculinus is determined by sex and breeding period. Moreover, the degree of inter- and intra-sexual home range overlap during the breeding period suggests that both males and females ofC. musculinus use space differently. Females did not share their home range with other females, while males fully shared it with both sexes, and male spacing is influenced by the distribution of females. A promiscuous-polygynous mating system is suggested forC. musculinus.
Wydawca
-
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
50
Numer
2
Opis fizyczny
p.197-206,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
  • Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto, Agencia Postal No 3, 5800, Rio Cuarto, Cordoba, Argentina
autor
autor
Bibliografia
  • Banks E. M., Brooks R. J. and Schnell J. 1975. A radiotracking study of home range and activity of the brown lemming (Lemmus trimucronatus). Journal of Mammalogy 56: 888–901.
  • Batzli G. O. and Henttonen H. 1993. Home range and social organization of the singing vole (Microtus miurus). Journal Mammalogy 74: 868–878.
  • Bondrup-Nielsen S. 1986. Analysis of spacing behaviour of females from a live-trapping study ofClethrionomys gapperi. Annales Zoologica Fennici 23: 261–267.
  • Boonstra R., Gilbert B. S. and Krebs C. J. 1993. Mating systems and sexual dimorphism in mass in microtines. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 224–229.
  • Bronner G. and Meester J. 1987. Comparison of method for estimating rodent numbers. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 17: 59–63.
  • Busch M., Kravetz F. O., Percich R. E. and Zuleta G. A. 1984. Propuesta para un control ecológico de la FHA a través del manejo del hábitat. Medicina 44: 34–40.
  • Busch M. and Kravetz F. O. 1992. Competitive interactions among rodents (Akodon azarae, Calomys laucha, C.musculinus andOligoryzomys flavescens) in a two-habitat system. I. Spatial and numerical relationships. Mammalia 56: 45–56.
  • Busch M., Miño M. H., Dadon J. R. and Hodara K. 2000. Habitat selection byCalomys musculinus (Muridae, Sigmodontinae) in crop areas of the pampean region, Argentina. Ecología Austral 10: 15–26.
  • Buzzio O. L. and Castro-Vázquez A. 2002. Reproductive Biology of the corn mouse,Calomys musculinus, a neotropical sigmodontine. Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy 9: 135–158.
  • Cabrera A. 1953. Esquema fitogeográfico de la República Argentina. Revista Museo de la Plata (Botánica) 8: 87–168.
  • Contreras J. L. and Rosi M. I. 1980. Comportamiento territorial y fidelidad al hábitat en una población de roedores del centro de la Provincia de Mendoza. Ecología (Argentina) 5: 17–29.
  • Cutrera R. A., Carreño N.B. and Castro-Vázquez A. 1992. Correlative genital tract morphology and plasma progesterone levels during the ovarian cycle in female corn mice. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 57: 14–22.
  • Desy E. A., Batzli G. O. and Liu J. 1989. Comparison of vole movements assessed by live trapping and radiotracking. Journal of Mammalogy 70: 652–656.
  • de Villafañe G. 1981. Reproducción y crecimiento deCalomys musculinus murillus (Thomas, 1916). Historia Natural 33: 237–256.
  • de Villafañe G. and Bonaventura S. M. 1987. Ecological studies in crop fields of the endemic area of Argentine hemorrhagic fever.Calomys musculinus movements in relation to habitat and abundance. Mammalia 51: 233–248.
  • de Villafañe G., Merler J., Quintana R. and Bo R. 1992. Habitat selection in cricetine rodent population on maize field in the Pampa region of Argentina. Mammalia 56: 215–229.
  • Erlinge S., Hoogenboom I., Agrell J., Nelson J. and Sandell M. 1990. Density-related home-range size and overlap in adult field voles (Microtus agrestis) in southern Sweden. Journal of Mammalogy 71: 597–603.
  • Gaulin S. J. and FitzGerald R. W. 1988. Home range size as a predictor of mating systems in Microtus. Journal of Mammalogy 69: 311–319.
  • Heske E. J. and Ostfeld R. S. 1990. Sexual dimorphism in size, relative size of testes, and mating systems in North American voles. Journal of Mammalogy 71: 510–519.
  • Hodara V. L., Kajon A. E., Quintans C. J., Montoro L. S. and Merani M. S. 1984. Parámetros métricos y reproductivos deCalomys musculinus (Thomas, 1913) yCalomys callidus (Thomas, 1916) (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 13: 453–459.
  • Hubbs A. H. and Boonstra R. 1998. Effects of food and predators on the home range size of arctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus parryii). Canadian Journal of Zoology 76: 592–596.
  • Ims R. A. 1987. Responses in spatial organization and behaviour to manipulations of the food resource in the voleClethrionomys rufocanus. Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 585–596.
  • Ims R. A. 1988a. The potential for sexual selection in males: effect of sex ratio and spatiotemporal distribution of receptive females. Evolutionary Ecology 2: 338–352.
  • Ims R. A. 1988b. Spatial clumping of sexually receptive females induces space sharing among male voles. Nature 335: 541–543.
  • Kesner M. H. and Linzey A. L. 1997. Modeling population variation inPeromyscus leucopus: and exploratory analysis. Journal of Mammalogy 87: 643–654.
  • Kravetz F. O. and Polop J. J. 1983. Comunidades de roedores en agroecosistemas del Departamento Río Cuarto, Córdoba. Ecosur 10: 1–18.
  • Laconi M. R. 1997. [Sistemas de apareamiento enCalomys muculinus yCalomys laucha (Muridae, Sigmodontinae)]. PhD thesis, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza: 1–60.
  • Laconi M. R. and Castro-Vázquez A. 1998. Precopulatory fighting and other aggressive interactions during mating encounters in the corn mouse,Calomys musculinus (Muridae, Sigmodontinae). Journal of Neotropical Mammalogy 5: 5–12.
  • Lindstedt S. L., Miller B. L. and Buskirk S. W. 1986. Home range, time and body size in mammals. Ecology 67: 413–418.
  • Madison D. M. 1980. Space use and social structure in meadow voles,Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 7: 65–71.
  • Mills J. N., Ellis B. A., Childs J. E., Maiztegui J. I. and Castro-Vázquez A. 1992a. Seasonal changes in mass and reproductive condition of the corn mouse (Calomys musculinus) on the Argentine Pampa. Journal of Mammalogy 73: 876–884.
  • Mills J. N., Ellis B. A., McKee K. T., Maiztegui J. I. and Childs J. E. 1992b. Reproductive characteristics of rodent assemblages in cultivate region of central Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 73: 515–526.
  • Mills J. N. and Childs J. E. 1998. Ecologic studies of rodent reservoirs: their relevance for human health. Emerging Infectious Diseases 4: 529–537.
  • Nupp T. E. and Swihart R. K. 1996. Effect of forest patch area on population attributes of whited-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in fragmented landscapes. Canadian Journal Zoology 74: 467–472.
  • Ostfeld R. S., Lidicker W. Z. Jr and Heske E. J. 1985. The relationship between habitat heterogeneity, space use and demography in a population of California voles. Oikos 45: 433–442.
  • Ostfeld R. S. 1986. Territoriality and mating system of California voles. Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 691–706.
  • Ostfeld R. S. and Heske E. J. 1993. Sexual dimorphism and mating systems in voles. Journal of Mammalogy 74: 230–233.
  • Polop J. J., Martinez R. L. and Torres M. P. 1985. Distribución y abundancia de poblaciones de pequeños roedores en la zona del Embalse de Río Tercero, Córdoba. Historia Natural (Argentina) 5: 33–44.
  • Polop J. J. and Sabattini M. S. 1993. Rodent abundance and distribution in habitats of Agrocenosis in Argentina. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 28: 39–46.
  • Priotto J. W. and Steinmann A. R. 1999. Factors affecting home range size and overlap inAkodon azarae (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) in natural pasture of Argentina. Acta Theriologica 44: 37–44.
  • Priotto J. W., Steinmann A. R. and Polop J. J. 2002. Factors affecting home range size and overlap inCalomys venustus (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) in Argentine agroecosystems. Mammalian Biology 67: 97–104.
  • Priotto J. W. and Polop J. J. 2003. Effect of overwintering adults on juvenile survival ofCalomys venustus (Muridae: Sigmodontinae). Austral Ecology 28: 281–286.
  • Priotto J. W., Steinman A. R., Provensal M. C. and Polop J. J. 2004. Juvenile dispersal inCalomys venustus (Muridae: Sigmodontinae). Acta Oecologica 25: 205–210.
  • Provensal M. C. and Polop J. 1993. Growth and determination of age inCalomys musculinus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Mammalia 57: 245–254.
  • Sabattini M. S. and Contigiani M. S. 1982. Ecological and biological factors influencing the maintenance of arenavirus in nature with special reference to the agent of Argentine Hemorrhagic Fever. Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Río de Janeiro: 251–262.
  • Slade N. A. and Blair S. M. 2000. An empirical test of using counts of individuals captured as indices of population size. Journal of Mammalogy 81: 1035–1045.
  • Sokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. 1979. Biometria. Principios y Métodos Estadísticos en la Investigación Biológica. H. Blume Ediciones, Madrid: 1–832.
  • Stickel L. F. 1954. A comparison of certain methods of measuring ranges of small mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 35: 1–5.
  • Swihart R. K. and Slade N. A. 1985. Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home range sizes. The Journal Wildlife Management 49: 1019–1025.
  • Swihart R., Slade N. A. and Bergstrom B. J. 1988. Relating body size to the rate of home range use in mammals. Ecology 69: 393–399.
  • Swihart R. K. and Slade N. A. 1989. Differences in home range size between sex ofMicrotus ochrogaster. Journal of Mammalogy 70: 816–820.
  • Vitullo A. D., Hodara V. L. and Merani M. S. 1987. Effect of persistent infection with Junin virus on growth and reproduction of its natural reservoir,Calomys musculinus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 37: 339–344.
  • Wolff J. O. 1985. The effects of density, food, and interespecific interference on home range size inPeromyscus leucopus andPeromyscus maniculatus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 2657–2662.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-article-c99de8f4-e851-48c6-8e88-f4fffb4af4f8
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.