Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2004 | 06 | 2 |
Tytuł artykułu

Data, sample sizes and statistics affect the recognition of species of bats by their echolocation calls

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Identification of bat species based on analysis of echolocation calls can be affected by the way data are manipulated, the diversity of species, and call variability. We document the effects of sample sizes and a priori assignment of calls by species on the outcome of discriminant function analysis (DFA) and multinomial logistic regression (MLR) of features of echolocation calls, and determine which features of calls are most useful for identification. We used recorded echolocation calls of eight species readily distinguishable by call features, including molossids, emballonurids and a moormopid recorded at sites in Belize, Brazil, and Mexico. On individual calls, we measured four features: frequency with most energy, highest and lowest frequencies and call durations obtained from sequences consisting of 10 calls. Cluster analysis and multiple analyses of variance indicated significant differences between the calls of different species. Outcomes of DFA and MLR were affected by both sample sizes (numbers of calls, numbers of sequences) and the subjective approach that researchers take to their data (i.e., categorizing calls or sequences of calls by species). Levels of variation in calls of some species in our sample often precluded the use of single calls in making call-based identifications. Accurate documentation of variability in echolocation behavior of sympatric bats is a prerequisite for an effective sound-based bat survey
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • Department of Biology, York University, North York, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
  • Afifi, A. A., and V. Clark. 1990. Computer-aided multivariate analysis. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 512 pp.
  • Ahlén, I. 1990. Identification of bats in flight. Swedish Society for Conservation of Nature and the Swedish Youth Association for Environmental Studies and Conservation.
  • Barclay, R. M. R. 1983. Echolocation calls of emballonurid bats from Panama. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 151: 515-520.
  • Barclay, R. M. R. 1999. Bats are not birds — a cautionary note on using echolocation calls to identify bats: a comment. Journal of Mammalogy, 80: 290-296.
  • Bernard, E. 2001. Species list of bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera) of Santarén area, Parà State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 18: 455-463.
  • Bernard, E., and M. B. Fenton. 2002. Species diversity of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in forest fragments, primary forest and savannas in central Amazon, Brazil. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80: 1124-1140.
  • Boughman, J. W., and G. S. Wilkinson. 1998. Greater spear-nosed bats discriminate group mates by vocalizations. Animal Behaviour, 55: 1717-1732.
  • Brigham, R. M., J. E. Cebek, and M. B. C. Hickey. 1989. Intraspecific variation in the echolocation calls of two species of insectivorous bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 70: 426-428.
  • Britton, A. R. C., G. Jones, J. M. V. Rayner, A. M. Boonman, and B. Verboom. 1997. Flight performance, echolocation and foraging behaviour in pond bats, Myotis dasycneme (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Zoology (London), 241: 503-522.
  • Ceballos, G., and A. Miranda. 2000. Guía de campo de los mamíferos de la Costa de Jalisco, México. Fundación Ecológica de Cuixmala. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, 502 pp.
  • Chávez, C., and G. Ceballos. 2001. Diversidad y abundancia de murciélagos en selvas secas de estacionalidad contrastante en el oeste de México. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología, 5: 27-44.
  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 567 pp.
  • Denzinger, A., B. M. Siemers, A. Schaub, and H.-U. Schnitzler. 2001. Echolocation by the barbastelle bat, Barbastella barbastellus. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 187: 521-528.
  • Dillon, W. R., and M. Goldstein. 1984. Multivariate analysis: methods and applications. Wiley, New York, 608 pp.
  • Fenton, M. B., and G. P. Bell. 1981. Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. Journal of Mammalogy, 62: 233-243.
  • Fenton, M. B., E. Bernard, S. Bouchard, L. Hollis, D. S. Johnston, C. L. Lausen, J. M. Ratcliffe, D. K. Riskin, J. R. Taylor, and J. Zigouris. 2001. The bat fauna of Lamanai, Belize: roosts and trophic roles. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 17: 511-524.
  • Fenton, M. B., Jacobs, E. J. Richardson, P. J. Taylor, and W. White. 2004. Individual signatures in the frequency-modulated sweep calls of large African large-eared free-tailed bats (Otomops martiensseni; Chiroptera: Molossidae). Journal of Zoology (London), 262: 11-19.
  • Griffin, D. R. 1958. Listening in the dark. Yale University Press, New Haven, 415 pp.
  • Griffin, D. R., F. A. Webster, and C. R. Michael. 1960. The echolocation of flying insects by bats. Animal Behaviour, 8: 141-154.
  • Herr, A., N. I. Klomp, and J. S. Atkinson. 1997. Identification of bat echolocation calls using a decision tree classification system. Complexity International, Volume 4, URL:
  • Ibáñez, C., J. Juste, J. Lopez-Wilchis, L. Albuja, and A. Nunez-Garduno. 2002. Echolocation of three species of sac-winged bats (Balantiopteryx). Journal of Mammalogy, 83: 1049-1057.
  • Jones, G., and T. Kokurewicz. 1994. Sex and age variation in echolocation calls and flight morphology of Daubenton’s bat Myotis daubentonii. Mammalia, 58: 41- 50.
  • Jones, G., and R. D. Ransome. 1993. Echolocation calls of bats are influenced by maternal effects and change over a lifetime. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 252: 125-128.
  • Jones, G., T. Gordon, and J. Nightingale. 1992. Sex and age-differences in the echolocation calls of the lesser horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hipposideros. Mammalia, 56: 89-193.
  • Jones, G., N. Vaughan, and S. Parsons. 2000. Acoustic identification of bats from directly sampled and time expanded recordings of vocalizations. Acta Chiropterologica, 2: 155-170.
  • Kalko, E. K. V. 1995. Echolocation signal design, foraging habitats and guild structure in six Neotropical sheath-tailed bats (Emballonuridae). Pp. 259-273, in Ecology, evolution and behaviour of bats (P. A. Racey and S. M. Swift, eds.). The Zoological Society of London, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 421 pp.
  • Kalko, E. K. V. 1997. Diversity in tropical bats. Pp. 13-43, in Tropical biodiversity and systematics. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biodiversity and Systematics in Tropical Ecosystems, Bonn, 1994 (H. Ulrich, ed.). Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, 357 pp.
  • Kalko, E. K. V., and H.-U. Schnitzler. 1993. Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight — implications for habitat use and prey detection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33: 415-428.
  • Kazial, K. A., S. C. Burnett, and W. M. Masters. 2001. Individual and group variation in echolocation calls of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 8: 339-351.
  • Kossl, M., E. Mora, F. Coro, and M. Vater. 1999. Two-toned echolocation calls from Molossus molossus in Cuba. Journal of Mammalogy, 80: 929-932.
  • Lachenbruch, P. A. 1975. Discriminant analysis. Hafner Press, New York, 128 pp.
  • Law, B. S., L. Reinhold, and M. Pennay. 2002. Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of Vespadelus spp. (Vespertilionidae) from New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Acta Chiropterologica, 4: 201-215.
  • Lawrence, B. D., and J. A. Simmons. 1982. Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocating bats. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71: 585-590.
  • Masters, W. M., S. C. Jacobs, and J. A. Simmons. 1991. The structure of echolocation sounds used by the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus: some consequences for echo processing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89: 1402-1413.
  • Neuweiler, G., W. Metzner, U. Heilmann, R. Rubsamen, M. Eckrich, and H. H. Costa. 1987. Foraging behavior and echolocation in the rufous horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus rouxi) of Sri Lanka. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20: 53-67.
  • Obrist, M. K. 1995. Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat and conspecifics on sonar signal design. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 36: 207-219.
  • Obrist, M. K., R. Boesch, P. F. Flückiger, and U. Dieckmann. 2004. Who’s calling? Acoustic bat species identification revised with synergetics. Pp. 468—477, in Advances in the study of echolocation in bats and dolphins. Proceedings of the Biosonar Conference 1998 (J. Thomas, C. Moss, and M. Vater, eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 604 pp.
  • Ochoa, J., M. J. O’Farrell, and B. W. Miller. 2000. Contribution of acoustic methods to the study of insectivorous bat diversity in protected areas from northern Venezuela. Acta Chiropterologica, 2: 171-183.
  • O’Farrell, M. J., and B. W. Miller. 1997. A new examination of echolocation calls of some neotropical bats (Emballonuridae and Mormoopidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 78: 954-963.
  • O'Farrell, M. J., and B. W. Miller. 1999. Use of vocal signatures for the inventory of free-flying neotropical bats. Biotropica, 31: 507-516.
  • Olden, J. D., and D. A. Jackson. 2002. A comparison of statistical approaches for modelling fish species distributions. Freshwater Biology, 47: 1976-1995.
  • Parsons, S. 1997. Search-phase echolocation calls of the New Zealand lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) and long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 75: 1487-1494.
  • Parsons, S., and G. Jones. 2000. Acoustic identification of 12 species of echolocating bats by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203: 2641-2656.
  • Patriquin, K. J., L. K. Hogberg, B. J. Chruszcz, and R. M. R. Barclay. 2003. The influence of habitat structure on the ability to detect ultrasound using bat detectors. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31: 475-481.
  • Pearl, D. L., and M. B Fenton, 1996. Can echolocation calls provide information about group identity in the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus)? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 74: 2184-2192.
  • Press, S. J., and S. Wilson. 1978. Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73: 699-705.
  • Ratcliffe, J. M, and J. W. Dawson. 2003. Behavioural flexibility: the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus, and the northern long-eared bat, M. septentrionalis, both glean and hawk prey. Animal Behaviour, 66: 847-856.
  • Ratcliffe, J. M., H. M. ter Hofstede, R. Avila-Flores, M. B. Fenton, G. F. McCracken, S. Biscardi, J. Blasko, E. Gillam, J. Orprecio, and G. Spanjer. In press. Conspecifics influence call design in the Brazilian free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology.
  • Russo, D., and G. Jones. 2002. Identification of twenty-two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time-expanded recordings of echolocation calls. Journal of Zoology (London), 258: 91-103.
  • Russo, D., G. Jones, and M. Mucedda. 2001. Influence of age, sex and body size on echolocation calls of Mediterranean (Rhinolophus euryale) and Mehely’s (Rhinolophus mehelyi) horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae), Mammalia 65: 429-436.
  • Rydell, J., H. T. Arita, M. Santos, and J. Granados. 2002. Acoustic identification of insectivorous bats (order Chiroptera) of Yucatan, Mexico. Journal of Zoology (London), 257: 27-36.
  • Sanchez, O., G. Lopez-Ortega, and R. Lopez-Wilchis. 1989. Murcielagos de la cuidad de Mexico y sus alrededores. Pp. 141-165, in Ecología urbana (R. Gío-Argáez, I. Hernández R., and E. Sáinz-H., eds.). DDF, Mexico City, 220 pp.
  • Schnitzler, H.-U., and E. K. V. Kalko. 1998. How echolocating bats search and find food. Pp. 183-196, in Bat biology and conservation (T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 365 pp.
  • Schnitzler, H.-U., and E. K. V. Kalko. 2001. Echolocation by insectivorous bats. BioScience, 51: 557-569.
  • Surlykke, A., and C. F. Moss. 2000. Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108: 2419-2429.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2001. Using multivariate statistics, 4th edition. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, 966 pp.
  • Timm, N. H. 2002. Applied multivariate statistics. Springer, Berlin, 720 pp.
  • Thomas, D. W., G. P. Bell, and M. B. Fenton. 1987. Variation in echolocation call frequencies recorded from North American vespertillionid bats: a cautionary note. Journal of Mammalogy, 68: 842-847.
  • Ulanovsky, N., M. B. Fenton, A. Tsoar, and C. Korine. In press. Dynamics of jamming avoidance in echolocating bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.
  • Vaughan, N., G. Jones, and S. Harris. 1997. Identification of British species by multivariate analysis of echolocation call parameters. Bioacustics, 7: 189-207.
  • Wollerman, L., and R. H. Wiley. 2002. Possibilities for error during communication by neotropical frogs in a complex acoustic environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52: 465-473.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.