PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 14 | 3 |
Tytuł artykułu

Biological limits of fecundity in sows - do they exist?

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
14
Numer
3
Opis fizyczny
http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume14/issue3/art-08.html
Twórcy
  • Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology in Dummerstorf, Wilhelm-Stahl-Allee 2, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
autor
Bibliografia
  • 1. Bazer FW, Robinson OW, Ulberg LC, 1969. Effect of dichlorvos and PMS on reproduction in swine. J Anim Sci, 28, 145.
  • 2. Beaulieu AD, Levesque CL, Patience JF 2006. The effects of dietary energy concentration and weaning site on weanling pig performance. J Anim Sci, 84, 1159-1168.
  • 3. Biensen NJ, Wilson ME, Ford SP 1998. The impact of either a Meishan or Yorkshire uterus on Meishan or Yorkshire fetal and placental development to days 70, 90 and 110 of gestation. J Anim Sci, 76, 2169-2176.
  • 4. Brüssow KP, König I 1990. Ovarreaktion und Embryonenqualität bei Jungsauen nach Superovulationsstimulation für den Embryotransfer [Ovarian reactivity and embryo quality after superovulatory stimulation in gilts for embryo transfer]. Mh Vet-Med, 45, 143-149 [in German].
  • 5. Brüssow KP, Egerszegi I, Rátky J, Soos F, Garcia-Casado P, Tuchscherer A, Toth P 2004. Organometric data of the reproductive tract in cycling and early pregnant Hungarian Mangalica pigs. Arch Tierzucht, 47, 585-594.
  • 6. Brüssow KP, Wähner M 2008. Biologische Potenziale in der Sauenfruchtbarkeit [Biological potentials of fecundity in sows]. Züchtungskunde, 80, 370-377 [in German].
  • 7. Christenson RK, Leymaster KA, Young LD 1987. Justification of unilateral hysterectomy ovariectomy as a model to evaluate uterine capacity in swine. J Anim Sci, 65, 738-744.
  • 8. Cunningham PJ, England ME, Young LD, Zimmerman DR 1979. Selection for ovulation rate in swine: Correlated response in litter size and weight. J Anim Sci, 48, 509-516.
  • 9. Davis KL, Robinson OW, Toelle VD 1987. Breed differences in uterine and ovarian measurements in gestating swine. J Anim Sci, 65, 685-691.
  • 10. Fenton FR, Bazer FW, Robison OW, Ulberg LC 1970. Effect of quantity of uterus on uterine capacity in gilts. J Anim Sci, 31, 104-106.
  • 11. Freking BA, Leymaster KA, Vallet JL, Christenson RK 2007. Number of foetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity. J Anim Sci, 85, 2093-2103.
  • 12. Gama LLT, Johnson RK 1993. Changes in ovulation rate, uterine capacity, uterine dimensions, and parity effects with selection for litter size in swine. J Anim Sci, 71, 608-617.
  • 13. Gondret F, Lefaucheur L, Louveau I, Lebret, Pichodo X, Le Cozler Y 2005. Influence of piglet birth weight on postnatal growth performance, tissue lipogenic capacity and muscle histological traits at market weight. Livestock Prod Sci, 93, 137-146.
  • 14. Gosden RG, Telfer E 1987. Numbers of follicles and oocytes in mammalian ovaries and their allometric relationship. J Zool, 211, 169-175.
  • 15. Hammond J 1914. On some factors controlling fertility in domestic animals. J Agric Sci, 6, 263-277.
  • 16. Hanenberg EHAT, Knol EF, Merks JWM 2001. Estimates of genetic parameters for reproduction traits at different parities in Dutch Landrace pigs. Livestock Prod Sci, 69, 179-186.
  • 17. Johnson RK, Pumfrey RA, Jones ASK, Zimmerman DR 1981. Embryo and fetal loss in gilts differing in ovulation rate. J Anim Sci, 53, 1, 74.
  • 18. Johnson RK, Nielsen MK, Casey DS 1999. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size. J Anim Sci, 77, 541-557.
  • 19. Kelly CR, Kopf JD, Zimmerman DR 1988. Characterization of antral follicle populations during the estrous cycle in pigs selected for ovulation rate. J Anim Sci, 66, 1230-1235.
  • 20. Knight JW, Bazer FW, Thatcher WW, Franke DE, Wallace HD 1977. Conceptus development in intact and unilaterally hysterectomized ovariectomized gilts: Interrelations among hormonal status, placental development, fetal fluids and fetal growth. J Anim Sci, 44, 620-637.
  • 21. Lamberson WR, Johnson RK, Zimmerman DR, Long TE 1991. Direct responses to selection for increased litter size, decreased age at puberty or random selection following selection for ovulation rate in swine. J Anim Sci, 69, 3129-3143.
  • 22. Lawrence J 1993. By the year 2000: More pigs from fewer sows. Natl. Hog Farmer, 12, 22-24.
  • 23. Müller J: 32 Ferkel je Sau und Jahr – Grenzkostenentwicklung in der Ferkelerzeugung bei hoher Produktionsintensität [32 piglets per sow and year - development of costs in piglet production under conditions of high production intensity] Schweinezucht aktuell 37 (2011) 21-23. [In German].
  • 24. Pope WF, First NL 1985. Factors affecting the survival of pig embryos. Theriogenology, 23, 91-97.
  • 25. Quiniou N, Dagorn J, Gaudre D 2002. Variation of piglets' birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livestock Prod Sci, 78, 63-70.
  • 26. Quinton VM, Wilton JW, Robinson JA, Mathur PK 2006. Economic weights for sow productivity traits in nucleus pig populations. Livestock Sci, 99, 69– 77.
  • 27. Rampacek GR, Robinson OW, Ulberg LC 1975. Uterine capacity and progestin levels in superinduced gilts. J Anim Sci, 41, 564-567.
  • 28. Redmer DA, Wallace JM, Reynolds LP 2004. Effect of nutrient intake during pregnancy on fetal and placental growth and vascular development. Dom Anim Endocrinol, 27, 199-217.
  • 29. Rehfeldt C, Kuhn G 2006. Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis. J Anim Sci, 84, E113-E123.
  • 30. Rosendo A, Druet T, Gogue J, Canario L, Bidanel JP 2007. Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs J Anim Sci, 85, 1615-1624.
  • 31. Ruiz-Flores A, Johnson RK 2001. Direct and correlated responses to two-stage selection for ovulation rate and number of fully formed pigs at birth in swine. J Anim Sci, 79, 2286–2297.
  • 32. Spitschak M, Langhammer M, Schneider F, Renne U, Vanselow J 2007. Two high-fertility mouse lines show differences in component fertility traits after long-term selection. Reprod Fertil Dev, 19, 815-821.
  • 33. Vallet JL, Klemcke HG, Christenson RK 2002. Interrelationship among conceptus size, uterine protein secretion, fetal erithropoesis, and uterine capacity. J Anim Sci, 80, 729-737.
  • 34. Vonnahme KA, Wilson ME, Foxcroft GR, Ford SP 2002. Impacts on conceptus survival in a commercial swine herd. J Anim Sci, 80, 553-559.
  • 35. Wilson ME, Biensen N, Ford SP 1999. Novel insight into the control of litter size in pigs using placental efficiency as a selection tool. J Anim Sci, 77, 1654-1658.
  • 36. Wu MC, Chen ZY, Jarell VL, Dzuik PJ 1989. Effect of initial length of uterus per embryo on fetal survival and development in the pig. J Anim Sci, 67, 1767-1722.
  • 37. ZDS 2010: Schweineproduktion 2009 in Deutschland (Pig production 2009 in Germany) [in German]
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-449d37d0-c4db-4e92-8087-b5a81cda807f
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.