Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2012 | 65 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

An attempt to use functional diversity indices for the assessment of weed communities

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Próba zastosowania wskaźników różnorodności funkcjonalnej do oceny zbiorowisk chwastów
Języki publikacji
Opis fizyczny
  • Department of Agricultural Systems, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Lodzki 3, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
  • Bi swa s S . R . , M a l l i k A .U. , 2010. Disturbance effects on species diversity and functional diversity in riparianand upland plant communities. Ecology, 91(1): 28-35.
  • Bl e ch a r c z yk A ., M a ł e ck a I . , Sk r z y p c z a k G. , 2000. Wpływ wieloletniego nawożenia, zmianowania i monokultury na zachwaszczenie jęczmienia jarego. / Effect of long-term fertilization, crop rotation and continuous cropping on weed infestation of spring barley. Ann. UMCS, Sect. E, 55, suppl.: 17-23 (in Polish).
  • d e B e l l o F. , L e p š J . , S e b a s t i à M . -T. , 2006. Variations in species and functional plant along climatic and grazing gradients. Ecography, 29: 801-810.
  • Dev i n S. , B e i s e l J.N., Us s eg l io - Pol a t e r a P. , Mo r e t e a u J .C . , 2005. Changes in functional biodiversity in an invaded freshwater ecosystem: the Moselle River. Hydrobiologia, 542: 113-120
  • Di a z S . , C a b i d o M. , 2001. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 647-655.
  • Domań s k a H. , 1997. Chwasty. [In:] Ogólna uprawa roli i roślin W. Roszak (ed.). Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa: 119-194. (in Polish).
  • E l t o n C . , 1927. Animal ecology. McMillan, New York.
  • F e l e d y n - S z ewc z y k B. , 2008. The changes of biodiversity of weed flora in organic system in the years 1996-2007. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 53: 63-68.
  • Hawe s C., Begg G.S., Squ i r e G.R., I a n ne t t a P.P.M., 2005. Individuals as the basic according unit in studies of ecosystem function: functional diversity in shepherd’s purse, Capsella: Oikos, 109: 521-534.
  • Ho op e r D.U. , S o l a n M., Syms t a d A ., D i a z S . , Ge s s n e r M .O. , Buchma n n N . , D eg r a nge V. , Gr ime P. , Hu lot F., M e rmi l lo d -Blond i n F. , Ro y J . , S p e h n E . , Va n P e e r L . , 2002. Species diversity, functional diversity, and ecosystem functioning. [In:] Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Synthesis and Perspectives. M. Loreau, S. Naeem, P. Inchausti (eds.). Oxford University Press: 195-281.
  • J a s t r z ę b s k a M ., Wa n i c M ., Ko s t r z ews k a M.K . , Nowi c k i J . , 2006. Biological diversity of cereal fields. Pol. J. Natur. Sc. 12: 499-518.
  • J ę d r u s z c z a k M. , An t o s z e k R. , 2004. Sposoby uprawy roli a bioróżnorodność zbiorowisk chwastów w monokulturze pszenicy ozimej. / Tillage systems and biodiversity of weed communities in winter wheat monoculture. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricult. 3: 47-59 (in Polish).
  • J i a n g X . L . , Z h a n g W.G. , Wa n g G . , 2007. Effects of different components of diversity on productiviry in artificial plant communities. Ecol. Res. 22: 625-634.
  • K a a r B. , F r e y e r B. , 2008. Weed species diversity and cover-abundance in organic and conventional winter cereal fields and 15 years ago. 2nd Conference of the International Society of Organic Agriculture Research ISOFAR, June 18-20, 2008, Modena, Italy, Archived at
  • Lavor el S., McI nt y r e S., L a ndsb e rg J., Forb e s T.D.A. , 1997. Plant functional classifications: from general group to specific group based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 474-478.
  • L eme r l e D. , S t o r r i e A . , P a n e t t a F.D. , 2004. The potential role of weed functional group in cropping systems. In: Weed management: balancing people, planet, profit. 14th Australian Weeds Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia, 6-9 September2004: papers and proceedings: 133-135.
  • L e p š J . , d e B e l l o F. , L avo r e l S . , B e rma n S . , 2006. Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter. Preslia, 78: 481-501
  • Lo s o s ová Z ., C hy t r ý M., C ima lová Š., K r o p á č Z ., Ot ý p k ová Z . , P y š e k P. , T i c hý L . , 2004. Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: gradients of diversity and species composition. J. Veg. Sci. 15: 415-422.
  • Ma g u r r a n A. , 2005. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Ma r sh a l l E . J.P., Br own V.K, Bo a tma n N.D. , Lutman P.J., Squire G.R. Ward L.K., 2003. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res. 43(2): 77-89.
  • Ma son N.W. H ., Ma cg i l l iv r ay K. , S t e e l J.B. , Wi l s o n J . B. , 2003. An index of functional diversity. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 571-578.
  • Mi r ek Z . , P i ękoś-Mi r e k H ., Z aj ą c A ., Z aj ą c M ., 1995. Vascular plants of Poland a checklist. Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera w Krakowie, PAN.
  • Mou c h e t M . A ., Vi l l e´ge r S ., Ma son N.W. H ., Mo u i l l o t D. , 2010. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct. Ecol. 24: 867-876.
  • Na e em S . , 2002. Disentangling the impacts of diversity on ecosystem functioning in combinatorial experiments. Ecology, 83: 2925-2935.
  • P e t c h e y O. L . , G a s t o n K . J . , 2002. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol. Lett. 5: 402-411.
  • P e t c h e y O. L . , G a s t o n K . J . , 2006. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol. Lett. 9: 741-758.
  • P u r i c e l l i E . , Tu e s c a D. , 2005. Weed density and diversity under glyphosate-resistant crop sequences. Crop Prot. 24: 533-542.
  • R a o C . R . , 1982. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients – a unified approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21: 24-43.
  • R i c o t t a C . , 2005. A note on functional diversity measures. Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 479-486.
  • Sch l e u t e r D. , D a u f r e s n e M ., M a s s o l F. , A rg i l l i e r C . , 2010. A user’s guide to functional diversity indices. Ecol. Monogr. 80(3): 469-484.
  • S c r o s a t i R. A ., G e n ne B. va n , Heave n C .S. , Wa t t C .A. , 2010. Species richness and diversity in different functional groups across environmental stress gradients: a model for marine rocky shores. Ecography, 33: 1-25.
  • S h a n n o n C . E . , 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Techn. J., 27: 379-423.
  • Si ng h A., Sh a rma G.P., R a g hu b a n s h i A .S. , 2008. Dynamics of the functional group in the weed flora of dryland and irrigated agroecosystems in the Gangetic plains of India. Weed. Biol. Manag. 8: 250-259.
  • St eve n s o n F.C ., L égè r e A . , S ima r d R .R. , A ng e r s D.A. , P a g e a u D. , L a f o n d J. , 1997. Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Sci. 45: 798-806.
  • S t o r k e y J . , 2006. A functional group approach to the management of UK arable weeds to support biological diversity. Weed Res. 46: 513-522.
  • T i lma n D. , 2001. Functional diversity. [In:] Encyclopedia of Biodiversity S.A. Levin (ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, A: 109-120.
  • Wa l k e r B . , K i n z i g A . P. , L a n g r i d e J . , 1999. Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems, 2: 95-103.
  • Wa l k e r B .H. , L a n g r i d g e J . L . , 2002. M easuring functional diversity in plant communities with mixed life forms: a problem of hard and soft attributes. Ecosystems, 5: 529-538.
  • Wa n i c M ., Ja s t r z ę b s k a M . , Ko s t r z ews k a M.K . , 2010. Influence of crop rotation and meteorological conditions on density and biomass of weeds in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Acta Agrobot. 63(1): 213-220.
  • Wi e n e r N. , 1948. Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Z a r z yck i K . , Tr z c i ń s k a -Ta c i k H , Róż a ń s k i W. , Sz e l ą g Z ., Wo ł e k J . , K o r z e n i a k U. , 2002. Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland. Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera, PAN, Kraków.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.