PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2009 | 17 | 1(65) | 41-67
Tytuł artykułu

TWO TYPES OF MODAL FICTIONALISM (Dwa typy modalnego fikcjonalizmu)

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
EN
The main aim of the article is a comparison of two types of modal fictionalism (which is, to put it roughly, the antirealist view concerning the existence of possible worlds). The most popular version of modal fictionalism, proposed by Gideon Rosen, is compared with the modal fictionalism based on Stephen Yablo's ideas concerning object fictionalism. Both views aim to: (i) deliver an interpretation of existential quantifiers ranging over possible worlds, according to which quantifying over possible worlds does not imply ontological commitments to possible worlds; (ii) give an analysis of modality. The distinctive feature of the former view is an account of all sentences with existential quantification ranging over possible worlds as elliptical versions of sentences of the form 'According to fiction of plurality of worlds, there is a world, in which...'. The modal fictionalist presupposes that the occurrence of the story prefix 'According to such and such fiction' makes all quantifiers in its range uncommittal ones. The latter view consists in taking sentences quantifying over possible worlds as uttered in make-believe spirit, where the speaker pretends that there are possible worlds and hence does not commit herself to the existence of possible worlds. Important feature of this view is that its proponent presupposes that there is some kind of dependence between that what modal facts there are and what is pretended in the game of make-believe for possible worlds discourse. The first view lacks this feature. The author argues that if one supposes that some of our ordinary modal statements, e.g. 'This car could have had different colour than it actually has', provide information about features of objects they are about, then Rosen's version of modal fictionalism faces the problem of explaining how modal fictionalist's analysis of modality preserves this kind of information about objects. The proponent of the latter version has tools to explain how her analysis preserves those bits of information about objects. The author concludes that this could be treated as a reason of preferring Yablo's version of modal fictionalism.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
17
Numer
Strony
41-67
Opis fizyczny
Rodzaj publikacji
ARTICLE
Twórcy
  • Piotr Warzoszczak, Uniwersytet Szczecinski, Wydzial Humanistyczny, Instytut Filozofii, ul. Krakowska 71-79, 71-017 Szczecin, Poland
Bibliografia
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
CEJSH db identifier
09PLAAAA06208
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.84ef5861-11eb-375e-9e6d-7a7f921ac141
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.