Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2006 | 30 | 519-531
Tytuł artykułu

The Perfectum Forms and Their Functions in the Lithuanian Dialect of Punsk

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
In the Lithuanian dialect of Punsk (Polish locality at the Lithuanian border) and in the literary Lithuanian simple and compound verbal forms are distinguished. Simple dialectal forms (iterativum - the past iterative tense, praeteritum - the past non-iterative tense, praesens and futurum) reflect the situation known from the literary language. The differences, however, are found in the compound forms. In the literary variant those are forms of 'perfectum' and 'inchoativum'. The Lithuanian dialect of Punsk has no inchoativum forms.The paradigm of dialectal perfectum forms differs from its literary counterpart in two respects. Firstly, there is no copula in the dialectal forms of perfectum praesenti for the 1st and 2nd person, both singular and plural. In the literary language the role of copula is played by a finite form of the verb 'buti' (to be). Secondly, the Lithuanian dialect of Punsk allows the use of a finite form of the dialectal verb 'turec' (literary: tureti) (to have) as a copula. Two essential meanings of the dialectal perfectum are distinguished in the Lithuanian dialect of Punsk: a temporal and a modal one. Temporal meanings are further divided into resultative ones (e.g. dialectal 'Islavus padlagi'. - I have washed the floor. (+ result: the floor is now clean)) and experiential (asserting) ones (e.g., dialectal 'As buvis Vokietijoj. - I have been to Germany. (+ experience: I know how people live there, I know what cities and villages look like etc.). The modal functions, in turn, comprise the following meanings: imperceptive (the speaker reports information while expressing doubts as to its truthfulness), hypothetical (the speaker says that P is possible) and conclusive (based on physical results the speaker says that P is possible). Recently, an influence of literary norms on the dialectal form of perfectum has been observed. This includes the use of finite verb forms of the dialectal verb 'buc' (to be) and the literary 'buti' 'to be' in the function of a copula in the 1st and 2nd persons singular and plural, as well as replacement of dialectal participle forms with their literary equivalents.
Opis fizyczny
Rodzaj publikacji
  • D. Roszko, Instytut Slawistyki PAN, ul. Bartoszewicza 1B m. 17, 00-337 Warszawa, Poland
Typ dokumentu
CEJSH db identifier
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.