Subfocal Color Categorization and Naming: The Role of Exposure to Language and Professional Experience
The current state of the debate on the linguistic factors in color perception and categorization is reviewed. Developmental and learning studies were hitherto almost ignored in this debate. A simple experiment is reported in which 20 Academy of Fine Arts, Faculty of Painting students' performance in color discrimination and naming tasks was compared to the performance of 20 Technical University students. Subfocal colors (different hues of red and blue) were used. While there was no difference in overall discrimination ability, AFA students had a much richer and specialized color vocabulary. Both groups also applied different strategies of discrimination and naming. However, naming system in neither group was coherent. This suggests that naming played primarily the role of markers for control processes rather than names for categories. It is concluded that up-to-date debate is too simplified and a complex model of interrelations between perceptual categorization and naming framed in the developmental context is needed rather than the search for a simple answer 'language', 'environment', or 'perceptual universals'.
- Berlin, B. & Kay, P. (1969).Basic Color Terms: their Universality and Evolution.Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Bornstein, M. H. (1985) On the development of color naming in young children: Data and theory.Brain and Language, 26, 72-93.
- Brown, R. & Lenneberg, E. (1954). A study in language and cognition.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 491, 454-462.
- Carruthers, P. (in press). Language in cognition. In E. Margolis, R. Samuels, & S. Stich (Eds.),The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Davidoff, J., Roberson, D., & Davies, I. R. L. (1999). Colour categories in a stone-age tribe.Nature, 398, 203-204.
- Diamond, A. (2006). The early development of executive functions. In E. Bialystok & F. I. M. Craig (Eds.),Life-span cognition: the mechanisms of change(pp. 70-95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Franklin, A. & Davies, I. R. L. (2004). New evidence for infant color categories.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 349-377
- Franklin. A., Drivonikou, G. V., Bevis, L., Davies I. R. L., Kay, P, & Regier, T. (2008). Categorical perception of color is lateralized to the right hemisphere in infants, but to the left hemisphere in adults.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 3221-3225.
- Gilbert, A. L., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2006). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 489-494
- Gopnik, A., Choi, S., & Baumberger, T. (1996). Cross-linguistic differences in semantic and cognitive development.Cognitive Development, 11 (2), 197-227
- Heider, E. & Olivier, D. (1972). The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages.Cognitive Psychology, 3, 337-354.
- Imai, M. & Gentner, D. (1996). A cross-linguistic study on constraints on early word meaning: Linguistic influence vs. universal ontology.Cognition, 62, 169-200
- Kay, P. & Regier, T. (2006). Language, thought, and color: Recent developments.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 51-54
- Levinson, S. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.),Language and Space(pp. 109-169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Li, P. & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning.Cognition, 83, 265-294.
- Medin, D. & Atran, S. (Eds.) (1999).Folkbiology.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Munnich, E. & Landau, B. (2003). The effects of spatial language on spatial representation: setting some boundaries. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.),Language in Mind(pp. 113-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Newcomb, N. S., Uttal, D. H. (2006). Whorf versus Socrates: Round 10.Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 394-396.
- Regier, T. & Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right.Trends in Cognitive Science, 13, 439-446.
- Roberson, D. (2005). Color categories are culturally diverse in cognition as well as in language.Cross-Cultural Research, 39, 56-71
- Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., & Braisby, N. (1999) Similarity and categorization: Neuropsychological evidence for a dissociation in explicit categorization tasks.Cognition, 71, 1-42.
- Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., & Davies, I. R. L. (2000). Color categories are not universal: Replications & new evidence from a stone-age culture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 369-398.
- Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I. R. L., & Shapiro, L R. (2004). The development of color categories in two languages: A longitudinal study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 554-571.
- Rosch, E. H. (1972). Probabilities, sampling and ethnographic method: The case of Dani color names.Man, 7, 448-466.
- Shepard, R. (2001) Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 581-601
- Soja, N. N. (1994) Young children's concept of color and its relation to the acquisition of color words.Child Development, 65, 918-937.
- Steels, L. & Belpaeme, T. (2005) Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 469-489.
- Tarlowski, A. (2008). Horizontal variability in biological knowledge. In F. Labrell & G. Chasseigne (Eds.),Aspects du développment conceptuel et langagier(pp.113-132). Paris: Éditions Publibook.
- Wilcox, T. (1999). Object individuation: Infants' use of shape, size, pattern, and color.Cognition, 72, 125-166.
CEJSH db identifier