PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2009 | 17 | 3 | 51-55
Tytuł artykułu

Biomechanical changes in pregnant women

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
PL
Celem pracy jest przedstawienie problemów związanych z różnorodnymi biomechanicznymi zmianami w układzie mięśniowo-szkieletowym kobiet w ciąży dotyczącymi postawy ciała także w aspekcie dolegliwości bólowych, zwłaszcza w dolnym odcinku pleców. Poruszane są zagadnienia związane ze zmianą funkcjonalnego zakresu ruchomości tułowia oraz ograniczeniami i trudnościami w wykonywaniu czynności codziennych i zawodowych. W pracy przedstawiono także wpływ ciąży na stabilność posturalną i chód. Wiedza zawarta w artykule powinna być pomocna zarówno osobom prowadzącym zajęcia w szkołach rodzenia, jak też lekarzom i fizjoterapeutom w profilaktyce oraz leczeniu dolegliwości układu mięśniowo-szkieletowego u kobiet w ciąży i po porodzie.
EN
The purpose of the paper is to present the problems related to various biomechanical changes taking place in the musculoskeletal system in pregnant women concerning body posture and pain problems and especially low back pain. The changes of the functional motion range of the trunk as well as the limitations and difficulties in daily life activities and work performance are taken into consideration. The influence of pregnancy on postural stability and gait is also presented in the paper. The knowledge gathered in the article should be helpful to those who provide the child birth classes as well as to physicians and physical therapists in prevention and treatment of musculoskeletal complaints of women during pregnancy and post partum.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
17
Numer
3
Strony
51-55
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2009-07-01
online
2010-11-08
Twórcy
  • The Chair of Rudiments of Clinical Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Physical Education, Katowice
autor
  • The Chair of Human Motor Functions, Department of Physical Education, University of Physical Education, Katowice
  • Central Clinical Hospital, Silesian Medical University, Katowice
Bibliografia
  • Konkler C. J. Principles of exercise for the obstetric patient, [w:] C. Kisner, L. A. Colby,# (red.) Therapeutic exercise foundations and techniques. Davis Company, Philadelphia, 1990, 547-576.
  • Jensen R. K. i wsp. Changes in segment mass and mass distribution during pregnancy. J. Biomech., 1996, 29, 2, 251-256.[Crossref]
  • Gilleard W. L., Brown J. M. Structure and function of the abdominal muscles in primigravid subjects during pregnancy and the immediate postbirth period. Phys. Ther., 1996, 76, 7, 750-762.[PubMed]
  • Fast A. i wsp. Low-back pain in pregnancy. Abdominal muscles, sit-up performance, and back pain. Spine, 1990, 15, 1, 28-30[Crossref]
  • Dumas G. A., Reid J. G. Laxity of knee cruciate ligaments during pregnancy. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 1997, 26, 1, 2-6.[Crossref]
  • Franklin M. E., Conner-Kerr T. An analysis of posture and back pain in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther., 1998, 28, 3, 133-138.[Crossref]
  • Otman A. S. i wsp. The importance of ‘lumbar lordosis measurement device’ application during pregnancy, and post-partum isometric exercise. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 1989, 31, 2, 155-162.[Crossref]
  • Gilleard W. L. i wsp. Static trunk posture in sitting and standing during pregnancy and early postpartum. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 2002, 83, 12, 1739-1744.[Crossref]
  • Ireland M. L., Ott S. M. The effects of pregnancy on the musculosceletal system. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 2000, 372, 169-179.
  • Ostgaard H. C. i wsp. Influence of some biomechanical factors on low-back pain in pregnancy. Spine, 1993, 18, 1, 61-65.[Crossref]
  • Novaes F. S. i wsp. Lombalgia na gestacao. (Low back pain during gestation). Rev. Lat. Am Enfermagem, 2006, 14, 4, 620-624.
  • Fast A. i wsp. Low-back pain in pregnancy. Spine, 1987, 12, 4, 368-371.[Crossref]
  • Ostgaard H. C. i wsp. Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine, 1991, 16, 5, 549-552.[Crossref]
  • Wu W. i wsp. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain, I: terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur. Spine J., 2004, 13, 7, 575-589.[Crossref]
  • Wang S. M. Backaches related to pregnancy: the risk factors, etiologies, treatments and controversial issues. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol., 2003, 16, 3, 269-273.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Gutke A. i wsp. Predicting persistent pregnancy-related low back pain. Spine, 2008, 33, 12, 386-393.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Ostgaard H. C. i wsp. Reduction of back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy. Spine, 1994, 19, 8, 894-900.[Crossref]
  • Gutke A. i wsp. Association between muscle function and low back pain in relation to pregnancy. J. Rehabil. Med., 2008, 40, 4, 304-311.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Ostgaard H. C. i wsp. The posterior pelvic pain provocation test in pregnant women. Eur. Spine J., 1994, 3, 5, 258-260.[Crossref]
  • Nilsson-Wikmar L. i wsp. Back pain in women post-partum is not a unitary concept. Physiother. Res. Int., 1999, 4, 3, 201-213.[Crossref]
  • Nilsson-Wikmar L. i wsp. Perceived pain and self-estimated activity limitations in women with back pain post-partum. Physiother. Res. Int., 2003, 8, 1, 23-35.[Crossref]
  • Gutke A. i wsp. Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in pregnancy: a cohort study of the consequences in terms of health and functioning. Spine, 2006, 31, 5, 149-155.[Crossref]
  • Ronchetti I. i wsp. Physical characteristics of women with severe pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a descriptive cohort study. Spine, 2008, 33, 5, 145-151.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Gilleard W. L. i wsp. Effect of pregnancy on trunk range of motion when sitting and standing. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 2002, 81, 1011-1020.[Crossref]
  • Cheng P. L. i wsp. Analysis of self-reported problematic tasks of pregnant women. Ergonomics, 2006, 49, 3, 282-292.[Crossref]
  • Lou S. Z. i wsp. Sit-to-stand at different periods of pregnancy. Clin. Biomech., 2001, 16, 3, 194-198.[Crossref]
  • Paul J. A., Frings-Dresen M. H. Standing working posture compared in pregnant and non-pregnant conditions. Ergonomics, 1994, 37, 9, 1563-1575.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • Nicholls J. A., Grieve D. W. Posture, performance and discomfort in pregnancy. Appl. Ergon., 1992, 23, 2, 128-132.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Masten W. Y., Smith J. L. Reaction time and strength in pregnant and nonpregnant employed women. J. Occup. Med., 1988, 30, 5, 451-456.
  • Ribas S. I., Guirro E. C. O. Analise da pressao plantar e do eqilibro postural em diferentes fases da gestacao./Analysis of plantar pressure and postural balance during different phases of pregnancy. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia / Brazilian J. Phys. Ther., 2007, 11, 5, 391-397.
  • Jang J. i wsp. Balance (perceived and actual) and preferred stance width during pregnancy. Clin. Biomech., 2008, 23, 4, 468-476.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Butler E. E. i wsp. Postural equilibrium during pregnancy: decreased stability with an increased reliance on visual cues. Am J. Ogstet. Gynecol., 2006, 195, 4, 1104-1108.[Crossref]
  • Nyska M. i wsp. Plantar foot pressures in pregnant women. Isr. J. Med. Sci., 1997, 33, 2, 139-146.
  • Lymbery J. K., Gilleard W. The stance phase of walking during pregnancy: temporospatial and ground reaction force variables. J. Am Podiatr. Med. Assoc., 2005, 95, 3, 247-253.
  • Bird A. R. i wsp. The effect of pregnancy on footprint parameters. A prospective investigation. J. Am Podiatr. Med. Assoc., 1999, 89, 8, 405-409.
  • Foti T. i wsp. A biomechanical analysis of gait during pregnancy. J. Bone Joint Surg., 2000, 82, 5, 625-633.
  • Wu W. i wsp. Gait coordination in pregnancy: transverse pelvic and thoracic rotations and their relative phase. Clin. Biomech., 2004, 19, 5, 480-488.[Crossref]
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10109-010-0019-6
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.