PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2013 | 8 | 4 | 410-414
Tytuł artykułu

Prediction for a planned relaparotomy in secondary peritonitis

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Aims. To devise a scoring system for clinical variables related to positive findings at relaparotomy in secondary peritonitis. Methods. We have retrospectively studied 195 cases of patients after relaparotomy. According to the operation’s findings, the patients were divided into two groups: ‘relaparatomy unnecessary’ group A, ‘relaparotomy necessary’ group B. 6 factors (age, sex, leukocyte count, C reactive protein, time of symptoms to index operation, Mannheim Peritonitis Index) were evaluated in respect to their significance in decision making for relaparotomy. The predictive value for positive operation`s findings of these factors was evaluated by logistic multivariate regression analysis. According to this model a risk scoring system was created to support the decision whether to perform a relaparotomy. Results. Relaparotomy was unnecessary (Group A) for 154 (79,0%) patients, for 41 (21,0%) it was necessary (Group B). Comparing the groups A and B, we found a significant difference in patients’ mean age (54 v. 63 years, p=0,002), mean CRP level (133,2 v. 182,8 mg/L, p=0,025), mean time of symptoms to index operation (38,1 v. 67,1 hours, p=0,006) and mean MPI value (22,4 v. 29,4, p<0,0001). According to the above-mentioned predictors, a scoring system was devised: −0,17-(0,003×patient’s age years)+(0.153×time of symptoms to index operation hours)-(0,297×MPI)+(0,192×CRP mg/l). The score was 24,798±25,593 in group A and 36,572±32,543 in group B(p=0,028). Conclusions: Scoring system was devised to assist in creating treatment strategy after secondary peritonitis. If the score is ≥37, a planned relaparotomy should be performed. If the score is ≤24, other diagnostic and therapeutic tactics should be applied.
Wydawca

Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
8
Numer
4
Strony
410-414
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2013-08-01
online
2013-06-12
Twórcy
autor
  • Center of Abdominal surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos, Santariskiu street 2, 08661, Vilnius, Lithuania, audrius.sileikis@santa.lt
  • Center of Abdominal surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos, Santariskiu street 2, 08661, Vilnius, Lithuania
autor
  • Center of Abdominal surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos, Santariskiu street 2, 08661, Vilnius, Lithuania
autor
  • Center of Abdominal surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos, Santariskiu street 2, 08661, Vilnius, Lithuania
autor
  • Center of Abdominal surgery, Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos, Santariskiu street 2, 08661, Vilnius, Lithuania
Bibliografia
  • [1] Strupas K. Peritonitas. Mokslinė monografija. ISBN 9986-19-647-7 // Vilniaus universiteto leidykla. - 2004, p. 88
  • [2] Christou N.V., Barie P.S., Dellinger E.P., Waymack J.P., Stone H.H. Surgical Infection Society intraabdominal infection study: prospective evaluation of management techniques and outcome // Arch Surg. - 1993, vol. 128, no. 2, p 193–198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420140070011[Crossref]
  • [3] Koperna T., Schulz F. Prognosis and treatment of peritonitis: do we need new scoring systems? // Arch Surg. - 1996, vol. 131, no. 2, p. 180–186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430140070019[Crossref]
  • [4] Wittmann D.H., Schein M., Condon R.E. Management of secondary peritonitis // Ann Surg. - 1996, vol. 224, no. 1, p. 10–18 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199607000-00003[Crossref]
  • [5] Lamme B., Boermeester M.A., Belt E.J., van Till J.W., Gouma D.J., Obertop H. Mortality and morbidity of planned relaparotomy versus relaparotomy on demand for secondary peritonitis // Br J Surg. - 2004, vol. 91, no. 8, p. 1046–1054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4517[Crossref]
  • [6] Rutherford E.J., Skeete D.A., Brasel K.J. Management of the patient with an open abdomen: techniques in temporary and definitive closure // Curr Probl Surg. - 2004, vol. 41, no. 10, p. 815–876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/j.cpsurg.2004.08.002[Crossref]
  • [7] Bosscha K., Hulstaert P.F., Visser M.R., van Vroonhoven T.J., van der Werken C. Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis // Eur J Surg. - 2000, vol. 166, no. 1, p. 44–49 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/110241500750009690[Crossref]
  • [8] Malangoni M.A., Inui T. Peritonitis the western experience // World J Emerg Surg. - 2006, p. 1:25
  • [9] Lamme B., Boermeester M.A., Reitsma J.B. … et al. Meta-analysis of relaparotomy for secondary peritonitis // Br J Surg. - 2002, vol. 89, no. 12, p. 1516–1524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02293.x[Crossref]
  • [10] Merlino J.I., Malangoni M.A., Smith C.M., Lange R.L. Prospective randomized trials affect the outcomes of intraabdominal infection // Ann Surg. - 2001, vol. 233, no. 6, p. 859–866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200106000-00017[Crossref]
  • [11] Malangoni M.A. Evaluation and management of tertiary peritonitis // Am Surg. - 2000, vol. 66,no. 2, p. 157–161
  • [12] Wacha H., Hau T., Dittmer R., Ohmann C. Risk factors associated with intraabdominal infections: a prospective multicenter study. Peritonitis Study Group // Angenbecks Arch Surg. - 1999, vol. 384, no. 1, p. 24–32 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004230050169[Crossref]
  • [13] Solomkin J.S., Wilson S.E., Christou N.V. … et al. Results of a clinical trial of clinafloxacin versus imipenem/cilastatin for intraabdominal infections // Ann Surg. - 2001, vol. 233, no. 1, p. 79–87 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200101000-00013[Crossref]
  • [14] Mulier S., Penninckx F., Verwaest C., Filez L., Aerts R., Fieuws S. … et al. Factors affecting mortality in generalized postoperative peritonitis: multivariate analysis in 96 patients // World J Surg. - 2003, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 379–384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-002-6705-x[Crossref]
  • [15] Ivatury R.R., Nallathambi M., Rao P.M., Rohman M., Stahl W.M. Open management of the septic abdomen: therapeutic and prognostic considerations based on APACHE II // Crit Care Med. - 1989, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 511–517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198906000-00005[Crossref]
  • [16] Holzheimer R.G., Gathof B. Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis-how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis // Eur J Med Res. - 2003, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 125–134
  • [17] Pacelli F., Doglietto G.B., Alfieri S., Piccioni E., Sgadari A., Gui D. … et al. Prognosis in intra-abdominal infections. Multivariate analysis on 604 patients // Arch Surg. - 1996, vol. 131, no. 6, p. 641–645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430180067014
  • [18] Van Goor H. Interventional management of abdominal sepsis: when and how // Langenbecks Arch Surg. - 2002, vol. 387, no. 5–6, p. 191–200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-002-0309-7[Crossref]
  • [19] Rakic M., Popovic D., Rakic M. … et al. Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy for treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections // Croat Med J. - 2005, vol. 46, no. 6, p. 957–963
  • [20] van Goor H., Hulsebos R.G., Bleichrodt R.P. Complications of planned relaparotomy in patients with severe general peritonitis // Eur J Surg. - 1997, vol. 163, no. 1, p. 61–66
  • [21] Hau T., Ohmann C., Wolmershauser A., Wacha H., Yang Q. Planned relaparotomy vs relaparotomy on demand in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections: the Peritonitis Study Group of the Surgical Infection Society-Europe // Arch Surg. - 1995, vol. 130, no. 11, p. 1193–1196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430110051009[Crossref]
  • [22] Van Ruler O., Mahler C.W., Boer K.R. … et al. Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis // JAMA. - 2007, vol. 298, no. 8, p. 865–872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.8.865[Crossref][WoS]
  • [23] Koperna T., Schulz F. Relaparotomy in peritonitis: prognosis and treatment of patients with persisting intraabdominal infection // World J Surg. - 2000, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 32–37 ♀ ♂ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002689910007[Crossref]
  • [24] Novotny A.R., Emmanuel K., Hueser N., Knebel C., Kriner M., Ulm K. … et al. Procalcitonin ratio indicates successful surgical treatment of abdominal sepsis // Surgery. - 2009, vol. 145, no. 1, p. 20–26 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.08.009[Crossref][WoS]
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_s11536-013-0180-7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.