Ultrasonography of the uterus within 6 weeks following Cesarean section

• Autorzy: Erik Dosedla , Tomáš Kvasnička , Pavel Calda
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Ultrasound; Cesarean section; Cesarean section scar; Dehiscence risk coefficient; Puerperium

• Czasopismo: Open Medicine
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 7
• Numer: 2
• Strony: 235-240

Daty

wydano

2012-04-01

online

2012-02-03

Twórcy

autor

Erik Dosedla

• Slovak Medical University, Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, III. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1st Private Hospital Košice-Šaca Inc., Košice-Šaca, Slovak Republic

autor

Tomáš Kvasnička

• First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital, Thrombosis Centre of Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, Charles University, Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic

autor

Pavel Calda

• First Faculty of Medicine and General Teaching Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charles University, Prague, Apolinarska 18, 128 51, Prague, Czech Republic,

Bibliografia

• [1] Antonelli E., Morales M.A., Dumps P., Boulvain M., Weil A. Sonographic detection of fluid collections and postoperative morbidity following Cesarean section and hysterectomy, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol,. 2004, 23, 388–392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.1023[Crossref]
• [2] Hadar E., Melamed N., Tzadikevitch-Geffen K., Yogev Y. Timing and risk factors of maternal complications of cesarean section, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2011, 283(4), 735–741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1450-0[Crossref]
• [3] Loverro G., Greco P., Vimercati A., Nicolardi V., Varcaccio-Garofalo G., Selvaggi L. Maternal complications associated with cesarean section, J. Perinat. Med., 2001, 29(4), 322–326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2001.046[Crossref]
• [4] Gemer O., Shenhav S., Segal S., Harari D., Segal O., Zohav E. Sonographically diagnosed pelvic hematomas and post-cesarean febrile morbidity, Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 1999, 65, 7–9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00003-X[Crossref]
• [5] Ben Nagi J., Ofili-Yebovi D., Marsh M., Jurkovic D. First trimester Cesarean scar pregnancy evolving into placenta previa/accreta at term, J. Ultrasound. Med., 2005, 24, 1569–1573
• [6] Jurkovic D., Hillaby K., Woelfer B., Lawrence A., Salim R., Elson C. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2003, 21, 220–227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.56[Crossref]
• [7] Becker R.H., Vonk R., Mende B.C., Ragosch V., Entezami M. The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2001, 17, 496–501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00423.x[Crossref]
• [8] Oyelese Y., Smulian J.C. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa, Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 107, 927–941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000207559.15715.98[Crossref]
• [9] Ofili-Yebovi D., Ben-Nagi J., Sawyer E., Yazbek J., Lee C., Gonzalez J., Jurkovic D. Deficient lowersegment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 31, 72–77 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.5200[Crossref][WoS]
• [10] Kushtagi P., Garepalli S. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery, Arch. Gynecol. Obstet., 2011, 283(3), 455–459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1384-6[Crossref]
• [11] Jastrow N., Chaillet N., Roberge S., Morency A.M., Lacasse Y., Bujold E. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can., 2010, 32(4), 321–327
• [12] Shalev J., Royburt M., Fite G., Mashiach R., Schoenfeld A., Bar J., Ben-Rafael Z., Meizner I. Sonographic evaluation of the puerperal uterus: correlation with manual examination. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest., 2002, 53, 38–41 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000049409[Crossref]
• [13] Koskas M., Nizard J., Salomon L.J., Ville Y. Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound findings within 24 hours following uneventful Cesarean section, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2008, 32, 520–526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6120[WoS][Crossref]
• [14] Sokol E.R., Casele H., Haney E.I. Ultrasound examination of the postpartum uterus: what is normal?, J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med., 2004, 15, 95–99 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767050310001650798[Crossref]
• [15] Goodlin R.C. Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1999, 106(12), 1329
• [16] Buhimschi C.S., Zhao G., Sora N., Madri J.A., Buhimschi I.A. Myometrial Wound Healing Post-Cesarean Delivery in the MRL/MpJ Mouse Model of Uterine Scarring, Am. J. Pathol., 2010, 177, 197–207 http://dx.doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.091209[Crossref]
• [17] Dicle O., Kucukler C., Pirnar T., Erata Y., Posaci C. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of incision healing after cesarean sections, Eur. Radiol., 1997, 7, 31–34 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300050103[Crossref]
• [18] Falanga V. The chronic wound: impaired healing and solutions in the context of wound bed preparation, Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, 2004, 32, 88–94 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcmd.2003.09.020[Crossref]
• [19] Schugart R.C., Friedman A., Zhao R., Sen C.K. Wound angiogenesis as a function of tissue oxygen tension: a mathematical model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008, 105, 2628–3633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711642105[Crossref]
• [20] Tinelli A., Malvasi A., Vittori G. Laparoscopic treatment of post-cesarean section bladder flap hematoma: A feasible and safe approach, Minim. Invasive. Ther. Allied. Technol., 2009, 18(6), 356–360 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13645700903201357[Crossref]
• [21] Vikhareva Osser O., Valentin L. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section, BJOG, 2010, 117(9), 1119–1126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02631.x[Crossref]
• [22] Vikhareva Osser O., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. (2008), OP23.01: Long duration of labor and postpartum anemia increase the risk of large defects in caesarean section scars. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 32, 389. doi: 10.1002/uog.5868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.5868[Crossref]
• [23] Regnard C., Nosbusch M., Fellemans C., Benalli N., Van Rysselberghe M., Barlow P., Rozenberg S. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2004, 23, 289–292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.999[Crossref]
• [24] Wound healing, chronic wounds http://www.emedicine.com/plastic/topic477.htm [Accessed 5 January 2007]
• [25] Pollio F., Staibano S., Mascolo M., Salvatore G., Persico F., De Falco M., Di Lieto A. Uterine dehiscence in term pregnant patients with one previous cesarean delivery: growth factor immunoexpression and collagen content in the scarred lower uterine segment, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 194(2), 527–534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.048[Crossref]
• [26] Vikhareva Osser O., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2009, 34(1), 90–97 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6395[WoS][Crossref]
• [27] Seow K., Huang L., Lin Y., Yan-Sheng Lin M., Tsai Y. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management, Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 2004, 23, 247–253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.974[Crossref]
• [28] Brassard N., Bujold E. (2009), OP15.09: A standardized method of LUS measurement in late pregnancy. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol., 34: 110. doi: 10.1002/uog.6796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.6796[Crossref]
• [29] Rotas M.A., Haberman S., Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management, Obstet. Gynecol., 2006, 107(6), 1373–1381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce[Crossref]
• [30] Ramirez M.M., Gilbert S., Landon M.B., Rouse D.J., Spong C.Y., Varner M.W., Caritis S.N., Wapner R.J., Sorokin Y., Miodovnik M., Carpenter M., Peaceman A.M., O’sullivan M.J., Sibai B.M., Langer O., Thorp J.M., Mercer B.M. Mode of Delivery in Women with Antepartum Fetal Death and Prior Cesarean Delivery, Am. J. Perinatol., 2010, 27(10), 825–830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1254548[Crossref]

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/s11536-011-0134-x