PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2010 | 5 | 2 | 184-188
Tytuł artykułu

Introito-cervical sigmoid colon transpositioning procedure

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The reported incidence of vaginal agenesis varies from 1 in 4,000 to 1 in 80,000 and individuals with congenital absence of vagina usually are first seen by a gynecologist at ages 14 to 15 years, when the absence of menses causes concern. A colon-introitus anastomosis was performed with interrupted absorbable sutures after opening peritoneum on müllerien dimple by sharp dissection using a guide inserted through the created perineo-abdominal tunnel. A rare case of vaginal agenesis with a septate uterus and normal tubes and ovaries is reported. Sigmoid vaginoplasty seemed the most appropriate procedure for the case and the continuity of the genital tract was well established as the patient menstruated vaginally after the operation.
Wydawca

Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
5
Numer
2
Strony
184-188
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2010-04-01
online
2010-04-17
Twórcy
autor
  • Zeynep Kamil Teaching Hospital, TR34668, Istanbul, Turkey
autor
  • Zeynep Kamil Teaching Hospital, TR34668, Istanbul, Turkey
autor
  • Zeynep Kamil Teaching Hospital, TR34668, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Zeynep Kamil Teaching Hospital, TR34668, Istanbul, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • [1] Fore S.R., Hammond C.B., Parker R.T., Anderson E.E., Urologic and genital abnormalities in patients with congenital absence of vagina, Obstet. Gynecol., 1975, 46, 410
  • [2] Frank R.T., The formation of an artificial vagina without operation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 1938, 35, 1053–1055
  • [3] Vecchietti G., Creation of an artificial vagina in Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome, Attual. Ostet. Gynecol., 1965, 11, 131–147
  • [4] McIndoe A.H., Banister J.B., An operation for the cure of congenital absence of the vagina, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Common., 1938, 45, 490–494
  • [5] Karateke A., Gurbuz A., Haliloglu B., Kabaca C., Koksal N., Intestinal vaginoplasty: is it optimal treatment of vaginal agenesis? A pilot study Surgical method of sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in vaginal agenesis, Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic. Floor. Dysfunc., 2006, 17, 40–45 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-1349-7[Crossref]
  • [6] Rajimwale A., FurnessIII P.D., Brant W.O., Koyle M.A., Vaginal construction using sigmoid colon in children and young adults. BJU International., 2004, 94, 115–119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-4096.2004.04911.x[Crossref]
  • [7] Darai E., Toullalan O., Besse O., Potiron L., Delga P., Anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic-perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty in women with Rokitansky’s syndrome, Human Reproduction, 2003, 11, 2454–2459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg443[Crossref]
  • [8] Kapoor R., Sharma D.K., Singh K.J., Suri A., Singh P., Chaudhary H., et al., Sigmoid vaginoplasty.long-term results, J. Urol. 2006, 67, 1212–1215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.037[Crossref]
  • [9] Martinez-Mora J., Isnard R., Castellvi A., Lopez Ortiz P., Neovagina in vaginal agenesis:surgical methods and long-term results, J. Pediatr. Surg., 1992, 27, 10–14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(92)90093-M[Crossref]
  • [10] Hendren W.H.., Atala A., Use of sigmoid bowel for vaginal reconstruction, J. Urol. 1992, 152, 752–755
  • [11] Hensle T.W., Reiley E.A., Vaginal replacements in children and young adults, J. Urol., 1998, 159, 1035–1038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63831-X[Crossref]
  • [12] Tillem S.M., Stock J.A,. Hanna M.K., Vaginal Construction in children, J. Urol., 1998, 160, 186–190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63089-1[Crossref]
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_s11536-008-0041-y
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.