PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2006 | 1 | 4 | 416-418
Tytuł artykułu

Prostaglandin E1, E2 and oxytocin in labor induction

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The risks of induction must be carefully weighed against the risks of allowing the pregnancy to continue and not inducing labor. The aim of the study was to show labor and neonatal outcome of 335 deliveries inducted in 2004 at Institute of gynecology and obstetrics Clinical Center of Serbia. Inductions were performed with PGE2, PGE1 and Oxytocin. The best ripening effect was noted in PGE2 group. The average duration of labor was 8.6h in PGE1group, 5.9h in PGE2 group and 10.4h in OT group. Sixty eight labors finished with cesarean section (20%). Comparing duration of labor, percentage of emergency cesarean sections, incidence of fetal distress during the labor we suggest Dinoprostone, placed intracervically, as an agent of choice for induction of labor.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
1
Numer
4
Strony
416-418
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2006-12-01
online
2006-10-24
Twórcy
  • Clinical center Serbia, Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia , plesinac@hotmail.com
Bibliografia
  • [1] A. Ben Haroush, Y. Yogev, H. Glickman, B. Kaplan, M. Hod and J. Bar: “Mode of delivery in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders and unfavorable cervix following induction of labor with vaginal application of PGE2”, Acta Obstet. Gynaecol. Scand., Vol. 84(7), (2005), pp. 665–671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00681.x[Crossref]
  • [2] Y. Yogev, A. Ben Haroush, Y. Gilboa, R. Chen, B. Kaplan and M. Hod: “Induction of labor with PGE2”, J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med., Vol. 14(1), (2003), pp. 30–34. [Crossref]
  • [3] A. Nigam, K. Singh, P. Dubay, K. Pandey, A. Bhagoliwal and A. Prakash: “Misoprostol vs. oxytocin for induction of labor at term”, Int. J Gynecol. Obstet., Vol. 86(3), (2004), pp. 398–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.05.010[Crossref]
  • [4] M.M. De Aquino and J.G. Cesatti: “Misoprostol vs oxytocin for labor in term and post term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial”, Sao Paulo Med. J., Vol. 191(3), (2003), pp. 102–106.
  • [5] G.K. Pandis, A.T. Papageorghiuo, C.M. Otigbah, R.J. Howard and K.H. Nicolaides: “Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor”, Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol., Vol 18(6), (2001), pp. 629–635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00595.x[Crossref]
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_s11536-006-0038-3
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.