PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2006 | 1 | 1 | 69-80
Tytuł artykułu

Communicating risks of foodborne diseases

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Foodborne diseases contribute substantially to the overall burden of disease, including hospitalizations, economic loss, and death. Nonetheless, in contrast to food safety experts, the public usually perceives foodborne diseases as low risk, which highlights the differences in the perception of the risk. Many studies have shown that risk perception is a complex concept determined by a variety factors. Among the factors associated with increased concern are high media attention and an impact on children. Risk communication is a new concept aimed at the providing meaningful, relevant, and accurate information. The purpose is to increase knowledge and enable the recipients to make informed choices. The process of risk communication is complicated by the many contributors, including experts, lay people, risk managers, media, and other stakeholders. It is a two-way process that requires respecting and listening to the contributors. The risk message and its originator are crucial components that account for the success of risk communication. Communication campaigns aim at raising awareness of hygienic food preparation at home, changing risk behavior, and reducing the number of foodborne infections. By considering the determinants of risk perception and the rules for communicating effectively, risk communication can help preventing foodborne infections and improve public health.
Wydawca

Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
1
Numer
1
Strony
69-80
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2006-03-01
online
2006-03-01
Bibliografia
  • [1] D. Byrne: “Irrational fears or legitimate concerns - Risk perception in perspective”, In: Speech at Risk perception: Science, Public Debate and Policy making conference, Brussels, 4 December 2003, (unpublished).
  • [2] J. Hansen, L. Holm, L. Frewer, P. Robinson and P. Sandøe: “Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks”, Appetite, Vol. 41, (2003), pp. 111–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00079-5[Crossref]
  • [3] P. Sparks and R. Shepherd: “Public Perceptions of food-related hazards: Individual and social dimensions”, Food Qual. Prefer., Vol. 5, (1994), pp. 185–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(94)90034-5[Crossref]
  • [4] P.S. Mead, L. Slutsker, V. Dietz, L.F. McCaig, J.S. Bresee, C. Shapiro, P.M. Griffin and R.V. Tauxe: “Food-related illness and death in the United States”, Emerg. Infect. Dis., Vol. 5, (1999), pp. 607–625. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0505.990502[Crossref]
  • [5] M.A. Cañete: “Speech”, on EU conference Risk perception: Science, public debate and policy making, Brussels 4–5 December 2003, (unpublished).
  • [6] The Royal Society: “Risk assessment: a study group report”, 1983, p. 94.
  • [7] D.M. Dosman, W.L. Adamowicz and S.E. Hrudey: “Socioeconomic determinants of health-and food safety-related risk perceptions”, Risk Anal., Vol. 21, (2001), pp. 307–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.212113[Crossref]
  • [8] H. Schütz, P.M. Wiedemann and P.C.R. Gray: “Risk perception beyond the psychometric paradigm”, Arbeiten zur Risiko-Kommunikation, Vol. 78, (2000), Forschungszentrum Jüulich, http://www.fz-juelich.de/mut/publikationen/liste_riko.html
  • [9] P.M. Sandman: “Risk communication: Facing public outrage”, EPA Journal, (1987), pp. 21-22.
  • [10] D.A. Powell: “Food safety and the consumer - perils of poor risk communication”, Can. J. Anim. Sci., (2000), Vol. 80, pp. 393–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/A99-091[Crossref]
  • [11] J. Gordon: “Risk communication and foodborne illness: message sponsorship and attempts to stimulate perceptions of risk”, Risk Anal., Vol. 23, (2003), pp. 1287–1296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00401.x[Crossref]
  • [12] E. Aakko: “Risk communication, risk perception, and public health”, Wisc. Med. J., Vol. 103, (2004), pp. 25–28.
  • [13] B. Fischhoff and J.S. Downs: “Communicating Foodborne Disease Risk”, Emerg. Infect. Dis., Vol. 3, (1997), pp. 489–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0304.970412[Crossref]
  • [14] O.P. Obermeier: Die Kunst der Risikokommunikation, Gerling Akademie Verlag, 1999, pp. 74-93.
  • [15] FAO/WHO: “The application of risk communication to food standards and safety matters”, Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation’, Rome, 2–6 February 1998, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 70.
  • [16] A. af Wåhlberg and L. Sjöberg: “Risk perception and the media”, J. Risk Res., Vol. 3, (2000), pp. 31–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136698700376699[Crossref]
  • [17] L.J. Frewer, C. Howard, D. Hedderly and R. Shepherd: “What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs”, Risk Anal., Vol. 16, (1998), pp. 473–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01094.x[Crossref]
  • [18] S. Rosati, A. Saba: “The perception of risks associated with food-related hazards and the perceived reliability of sources of information”, Int. J. Food Sci. Tech., Vol. 39, (2004), pp. 491–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00808.x[Crossref]
  • [19] R.J. Eiser, S. Miles and L.J. Frewer: “Trust, perceived risk and attitudes toward food technologies”, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., Vol. 32, (2002), pp. 2423–2433. [Crossref]
  • [20] K. Blaine and D. Powell: “Communication of food-related risks”, J. Agrobiotech. Manag. Econ., Vol. 4, (2001), pp. 179–185.
  • [21] M. Korthals: “Ethics of di.erences in risk perception and views on food safety”, Food Protect. Tr., Vol. 24, (2004), pp. 498–503.
  • [22] WHO: “Foodborne surveillance”, http://www.who.int/foodsafety/foodborne_disease/surveillance/en/, (Last visited: 7 Dec 05).
  • [23] D. Powell: “An Introduction to Risk Communication and the Perception of Risk”, http://sginrm.ntpu.edu.tw/yml/download/risk04/risk-review.pdf, (Last visited: 7 Dec 05).
  • [24] P.M. Sandman: “Explaining risk to non-experts: a communications challenge”, Emergency Preparedness Digest, (1987), pp. 25-29.
  • [25] National Research Council: Improving Risk Communication, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 26–32.
  • [26] National Research Council: Improving Risk Communication, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1989, p. 175.
  • [27] R. Macfarlane: “Integrating the consumer interest in food safety: the role of science and other factors”, Food Policy, Vol. 27, (2002), pp. 65–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00003-9[Crossref]
  • [28] W.E. Walker, P. Harremoes, J. Rotmans, J.P. van der Sluijs, M.B.A. van Asselt, P. Janssen and M.P. Krayer von Krauss: “Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support”, Integrated Assessment, Vol. 4, (2003), pp. 5–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466[Crossref]
  • [29] S. Miles and L.J. Frewer: “Public perception of scientific uncertainty in relation to food hazards”, J. Risk Res., Vol. 6, (2003), pp. 267–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000088883[Crossref]
  • [30] L.J. Frewer, S. Miles, M. Brennan, S. Kuznesof, M. Ness and C. Ritson: “Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty”, Public Underst. Sci., Vol. 11, (2002), pp. 363–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/304[Crossref]
  • [31] H-D, Werlein and K. Gerlach: “Enterohämorrhagische E. coli (EHEC)”, http://www.harnisch.com/hygiene_report/Enterohaemorrhagische%20E%20coli.pdf, (Last visited: 7 Dec 05).
  • [32] V.T. Covello and F.H. Allen: Seven Cardinal Rules of Risk Communication. Pamphlet, U.S. E.P.A., Washington, DC, April 1988.
  • [33] O. Renn: “Perception of risks”, Toxicol. Lett., Vol. 149, (2004), pp. 405–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.051[Crossref]
  • [34] S. Miles, D.S. Braxton and L.J. Frewer: “Public perceptions about microbiological hazards in food”, Brit. Food J., Vol. 101, (1999), pp. 744–762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070709910293670[Crossref]
  • [35] S. Miles and L.J. Frewer: “Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards”, Food Qual. Prefer., Vol. 12, (2001), pp. 47–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00029-X[Crossref]
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_s11536-006-0001-3
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.