Composite Inlays as A Modern Way of Posterior Restorations in the Dental Arch

• Autorzy: Renata Chałas , Marta Jurczykowska , Rafał Marczyński , Elżbieta Pels
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Modern restorative dentistry offers many methods of restoring qualitative cavities within the clinical crowns. Due to the concept of maintaining continuity of the dental arch and maintaining the correct plane of occlusion, for reconstruction of posterior teeth, there are especially recommended indirect restorations, which are made in the dental laboratory, i.e. crown inlays. The aim of the study was based on the literature to describe indications, classifications and advantages of indirect composite inlays. Additionally, factors affecting the durability of indirect composite inlays and the influence on stomatognathic system were noted. Authors concluded that composite inlays can be recommended restoration method, not only in situations of loss of clinical crown tissue, but also in situations where it is necessary as structural reinforcement, e.g., in the case of Cracked Tooth Syndrome or Molar Incisor Hypomineralization.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

composite inlays; indirect restorations; posterior restorations

• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Public Health
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 124
• Numer: 2
• Strony: 99-102

Daty

online

2014-08-08

Twórcy

autor

Renata Chałas

• Chair and Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Medical University of Lublin, Poland,

autor

Marta Jurczykowska

• Chair and Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Medical University of Lublin, Poland

autor

Rafał Marczyński

• Department of Prosthetics, Medical University of Lublin, Poland

autor

Elżbieta Pels

• Chair and Department of Paedodontics, Medical University of Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215-35[PubMed]
• 2. Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2002;18(6):470-8.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 3. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, et al. In vitro characterization of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent Mate.r 2003;19:393-8.
• 4. Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Mechanical Properties of light-cured composites polymerized with several additional post-curing methods. Oper Dent. 2005;30:389-94.[PubMed]
• 5. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int. 2001;32:199-205.[PubMed]
• 6. Pires-de-Souza Fde C, Garcia Lda F, Hamida HF, Casemiro LA. Color stability of composites subjected to accelerated aging after curing using either a halogen or a light emitting diode source. Braz Dent J. 2007;19:119-23.
• 7. Borba M, Della Bona A, Cacchetti D. Flexural strength and hardness of direct and indirect composites. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23:5-10.
• 8. Terry DA, Touati B. Clinical consideration for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 200;13:51-8.
• 9. Sobolewska E, Frączak B. Wpływ materiałów nowej generacji stosowanych w protetyce odtwórczej na środowisko jamy ustnej. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2010;56;3;66-80.
• 10. Żarow M, Krupiński J. Pośrednie wypełnienia kompozytowe w przypadku znacznego zniszczenia koron zęböw bocznych. Cz. IV. Mag Stomatol. 2005;1:44-7.
• 11. Żarow M. Odbudowa zęböw bocznych po leczeniu endodontycznym. Cz. I. Mag Stom. 2005;10:10-4.
• 12. Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored teeth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J. 1991;41:25-32.[PubMed]
• 13. Okeson JP Leczenie dysfunkcji narządu żucia i zaburzeń zwarcia. Lublin: Wyd. Czelej; 2005.
• 14. Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior composite resins. Compend Cintin Educ Dent. 2005;26:495-503.[PubMed]
• 15. The glossary of prosthodontics terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:10-92.[PubMed]
• 16. Keough B. Occlusion based treatment planning for complex dental restorations: Part I. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2003;23:237-47.
• 17. FDI Commission on Oral Health, Research and Epidemiology. A review of the development defect of enamel index (DDE index). Int Dent. 1992;42:411-26.
• 18. Fagrell TG, Lingström P, Olsson S, et al. Bacterial invasion of dentinal tubules beneath apparently intact but hypo mineralized enamel in molar teeth with molar incisor hypomineralization. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:333-40.[WoS][Crossref]
• 19. Rodd HD, Morgan CR, Day PF, Boissonade FM. Pilpal expression of TRPV1 in molar incisor hypomineralisation. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007;8:184-8.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 20. Kellerhoff NM, Lussi A. Die “Molaren-Inzisiven-Hypomineralisation”. Schweiz Monnatschr Zahn-Med. 2004;114:243-9.
• 21. Feierabend S, Halbleib K, Hellwig E. Quintessenz 2011;62(12):1637-1643.
• 22. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Madden T, Barnes C. Cracked Teeth: a practice based prevalence survey. J Dent Res. 2007;86:abstr. 2044
• 23. Cracking the cracked tooth code. Endodontics: AAE Colleagues for Excellence, 1997;(fall/winter):1-13.
• 24. Bader JD, Martin JA, Shugars DA. Incidence rates for complete cusp fracture. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001;29:346-53.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 25. Signore A, Benedicenti S, Covani U, Ravera G. A4-to 6-year retrospective clinical study of cracked tooth restored with bonded indirect resin composite onlays. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:609-16.
• 26. Lynch CD, Burke FM, NíRíordaín R, Hannigan A. The influence of coronal restoration type on the survival of endodontically treated teeth. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004;12:171-6.
• 27. Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2010;36:609-617.[PubMed]
• 28. Goodcare CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontics management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont. 1994;3:243-0.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/pjph-2014-0023