Nowa wersja platformy jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 8 | 1 | 29-44
Tytuł artykułu

Value of Content-Based Deception Detection Methods

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji

Opis fizyczny
  • Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland
  • Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University Krakow Poland
  • Adams S.H. (1996), Statement analysis: What do suspects’ words really reveal? FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, October, 12-20.
  • Akehurst L., Bull R., Vrij A., Koehnken G. (2004), Th e eff ects of training professional groups and lay persons to use Criteria - Based Content Analysis to detect deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 877-891.[Crossref]
  • Akehurst L., Koehnken G., Hoefer E. (2001), Content credibility of accounts derived from live and video presentations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 65-83.[Crossref]
  • Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1992). Deception detection and reality monitoring: A new answer to an old question? In F. Losel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and Law. International Perspectives (328-332). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Arntzen F. (1989), Psychologia zeznań świadkow. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
  • Bembibre, J., & Higueras, L. (2011). Diff erential eff ectiveness of the cognitive interview in a simulation of testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 473-489.[Crossref]
  • Blandon-Gitlin, I., Pezdek, K., Lindsay, S.D., & Hagan, L. (2008). Criteriabased content analysis of true and suggested accounts of events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 901-917.
  • Bradford, D. (2006.) Detection of deception in the confessional context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New South Wales.
  • Buck, J. A., Warren, A. R., Betman, S. I., & Brigham, J. C. (2002). Age diff erences in Criteria-Based Content Analysis scores in typical child sexual abuse interviews. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 267-283.[Crossref]
  • Caso, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & de Leo, G. (2006). Deceptive responses: Th e impact of verbal and nonverbal countermeasures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 99-111.[Crossref]
  • Craig, R. A., Scheibe, R., Raskin, D. C., Kircher, J. C. & Dodd, D. (1999). Interviewer questions and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 77-85.[Crossref]
  • Dando. C. J., Bull, R. (2011). Maximising opportunities to detect verbal deception: Training police offi cers to interview tactically. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Off ender Profi ling, 8, 189-202.
  • Davies, G. M., Westcott, H. L., and Horan, N. (2000), Th e impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child abuse victims, Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 81-97.
  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Dukała, K. Sporer, S., Polczyk, R. (in preparation). Can Cognitive Interview Impair Lie Detection Using CBCA Criteria in Elderly Witnesses Testimonies?
  • Erdmann, K., Volbert, R., & Bohm, C. (2004). Children report suggested events even when interviewed in a non-suggestive manner: What are its implications for credibility assessment? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 561-589.
  • Esplin, P. W., Boychuk, T., & Raskin, D. C. (1988, June). A fi eld study of criteria- based content analysis of children’s statement in sexual abuse cases. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Studies Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy.
  • Fiedler, K., & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199-223.[Crossref]
  • Fisher, R.P, & Geiselman, R.E. (1992). Memory enhancement techniques for investigative interviewing: Th e cognitive interview. Springfi eld, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Godert, H.W., Gamer, M., Rill, H.G., & Vossel, G. (2005) Statement validity assessment Inter-rater reliability of criteria-based content analysis in the mock-crime paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 225-245.
  • Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., & Landstrom, S. (2006). Children recalling an event repeatedly: Eff ects on RM and CBCA scores. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 81-98.[Crossref]
  • Gruza, E. (2009). Psychologia sądowa dla prawnikow. Warszawa: Ofi cyna Wolters Kluwer business.
  • Hernandez-Fernaud, E., & Alonso-Quecuty, M.L. (1997). Th e Cognitive Interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 55-68.[Crossref]
  • Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1997). Th e relationships among interviewer utterance type, CBCA scores and the richness of children’s responses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 169-176.[Crossref]
  • Johnson. M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.[Crossref]
  • Kohnken, G. (1999, July). Statement Validity Assessment. Paper presented at the pre-conference programme of applied courses ‘Assessing credibility’ organised by the European Association of Psychology and Law. Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kohnken, G. (2004). Statement validity analysis and the ‘detection of the truth. In P.A. Granhag, & L.A. Stro¨mwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (41-63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kohnken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Ho¨fer, E. (1995). Th e cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adult’s statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671-684.[Crossref]
  • Lamers-Winkelman, F., & Buffi ng, F. (1996). Children’s testimony in the Netherlands: A study of statement validity analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 304-321.[Crossref]
  • Landry, K., & Brigham, J. (1992). Th e eVect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663-675.[Crossref]
  • Marten, Z. (2012). Psychologia zeznań. Warszawa: Lexis Nexis. Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). Th e cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 16, 340-372.
  • Otgaar, H., Candel, I., Memon, A., Almerigogna, J. (2010), Diff erentiating between children’s true and false memories using Reality Monitoring criteria’ Psychology, Crime and Law,16, 555-566.
  • Porter, S., Yuille, J. C., & Lehman, D. R. (1999). Th e nature of real, implanted, and Fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: Implications for the recovered memory debate. Law and Human Behavior, 2, 517-537.[Crossref]
  • Raskin, D. C. & Esplin, P. W. (1991b). Statement validity assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 265-291.
  • Roberts, K., P. & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Reality-monitoring characteristics in confi rmed and doubtful allegations of child sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1049-1079.[Crossref]
  • Ruby, C. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1997). Th e usefulness of the Criteria-Based Content Analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 705-737.[Crossref]
  • Ruby, C.L. & Brigham, J.C. (1998). Can criteria-based content analysis distinguish between true and false statements of African-American speakers? Law and Human Behaviour, 22, 369-388.
  • Santtila, P., Roppola, H., & Niemi, P. (1999). Assessing the truthfulness of witness statements made by children (aged 7-8, 10-11, and 13-14) employing scales derived from Johnson and Raye’s model of Reality Monitoring. Expert Evidence, 6, 273-289.
  • Santtila, P., Roppola, H., Runtti, M., & Niemi, P. (2000). Assessment of child witness statements using Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA): Th e eff ects of age, verbal ability, and interviewer’s emotional style. Psychology, Crime & Law, 6, 159-179.[Crossref]
  • Saykaly, Ch. (2009), Eff ects of Multiple Interview on Children’s Verbal Expressive Behaviour of True and Fabricated Events. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
  • Schelleman-Off ermans, K. and Merckelbach, H. (2010), Fantasy proneness as a confounder of verbal lie detection tools. J. Investig. Psych. Off ender Profi l., 7, 247-260.
  • Short, J. L. and Bodner, G. E. (2011), Diff erentiating accounts of actual, suggested and fabricated childhood events using the judgment of memory characteristics questionnaire. Appied. Cogniive. Psychology, 25: 775-781.
  • Sporer S.L., Sharman S.J. (2006), Should I Believe this? Reality Monitoring of Accounts of Self - Experienced and Invented Recent and Distant Autobiographical Events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 837-854.[Crossref]
  • Sporer, S. (1997). Th e less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.[Crossref]
  • Sporer, S. L. & Breuer, M. M. (2005). Validity of the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales-Short Training Version-German (ARJS-STV-G). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, TBA, San Antonio.
  • Sporer, S. L. & Bursh, S. E. (2003). Training to Detect Deception by Verbal Means: Learning to Discriminate or Change in Response Bias? Unpublished Manuscript, University of Giessen, Germany.
  • Sporer, S.L. (2004). Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. In P.A. Granhag & L. Stromwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (64-102). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  • Sporer, S.L., & Kupper, B. (1995). Realita¨tsu¨berwachung und die Beurteilung des Wahrheitsgehaltes von Erza¨hlungen: Eine experimentelle Studie [Reality monitoring and the judgment of the truthfulness of accounts: An experimental study]. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 26, 173-193.
  • Steller, M. and Kohnken, G. (1989) “Criteria-Based Statement Analysis”, in Raskin, D.C. (ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 217-245.
  • Steller, M., & Ko¨hnken, G. (1989). Statement analysis: Credibility assessment of children’s testimonies in sexual abuse cases. In D.C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (217-245). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Steller, M., & Wellershaus, P. (1996). Information enhancement and credibility assessment of child statements: the impact of the cognitive interview technique on criteria-based content analysis. In G.Davies, S.Lloyd Bostock, M.McMurran, & C.Wilson (Eds.),Psychology, law and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (118-126). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Stromwall, L. A. & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Children’s Repeated Lies and Truths: Eff ects on Adults’ Judgments and Reality Monitoring Scores. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 345-356.[Crossref]
  • Stromwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Children’s repeated lies and truths: Eff ects on adults judgements and reality monitoring scores. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 345-356.[Crossref]
  • Tye, M. C., Amato, S. L., Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., & Peters, D. (1999).Th e willigness of children to lie and the assessment of credibility in an ecologically relevant laboratory setting. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 92-109.[Crossref]
  • Vrij A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the fi rst 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11, 3-41.[Crossref]
  • Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Let me inform you how to tell aconvincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 113-126.[Crossref]
  • Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., Bull, R. (2002). Will the truth come out? Th e eff ect of deception, age, status, coaching and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behaviour, 26, 261-283.
  • Vrij, A., Kneller, W., & Mann, S. (2000). Th e eff ect of informing liars about Criteria- Based Content Analysis on their ability to deceive CBCA-raters. Legal and Criminological Psychology 5, 57-70.
  • Vrij, A., Mann, S., Kristen, S., & Fischer, R. (2007). Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behaviour, 31, 499-518.
  • Wojciechowski, B. (2012). Ocena wiarygodności zeznań świadkow dorosłych przy zastosowaniu psychologicznych i prawniczych kryteriow treściowych. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Silesia.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.