A Hermeneutical Analysis of the InternalistApproachin the Philosophy of Sport

• Autorzy: Francisco Javier Lopez Frias , Xavier Gimeno Monfort
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this paper, we make a hermeneutical analysis of internalism, the dominant tradition in the philosophy of sports. In order to accomplish this, we identify the prejudices that guide the internalist view of sports, namely the Platonic-Analytic prejudice introduced by Suits, one of the forefathers of internalism. Then, we critically analyze four consequences of following such a prejudice: a) its reductive nature, b) the production of a unrealistic view of sports, c) the vagueness of the idea of excellence; and d) the leap from the descriptive analysis of the sporting phenomenon to the setting of normative requirements for the practice of sports.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

hermeneutics; philosophy of sports; internalism; Heidegger; excellency; prejudice

• Czasopismo: Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 67
• Numer: 1
• Strony: 5-12

Daty

wydano

2015-09-01

otrzymano

2015-09-11

zaakceptowano

2015-10-28

online

2015-11-26

Twórcy

autor

Francisco Javier Lopez Frias

• College of Health and Human Development and Rock Ethics Institute The Pennsylvania State University University Park, State College, PA 16801 The United States of America,
• conception and design of the study
• manuscript preparation
• obtaining funding

autor

Xavier Gimeno Monfort

• University of Valencia, Spain
• acquisition of data
• analysis and interpretation of data

Bibliografia

• Aggerholm, K. (2015). Talent Development, Existential Philosophy and Sport: on Becoming an Elite Athlete. New York: Routledge.
• D’Agostino, F. (1981). The Ethos of Games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 8(1), 7-18.
• Gadamer, H.G. (1997). Truth and Method. New York: Seabury Press.
• Gallagher, S. (1992). Hermeneutics and Education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Heidegger, M. (2002). Towards the definition of philosophy with a transcript of the lecture-course “On the nature of the university and academic study” (Freiburg Lecture-Courses 1919).
• Isidori, E., Maulini, C., Frías, L., & Javier, F. (2013). Sport and Ethics of Weak Thought: A New Manifesto for Sport Education. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 60(1), 22-29. DOI: 10.2478/pcssr-2013-0023[Crossref]
• Kosiewicz, J. (2009). Philosophy of Sport from the Institutional, Content Related and Methodological Viewpoint. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 46(1), 5-38.DOI: 10.2478/v10141-009-0001-5[Crossref]
• Kretchmar, R.S. (2007). Dualisms, Dichotomies and Dead Ends: Limitations of Analytic Thinking about Sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1(3), 266-280. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/17511320701676866[Crossref]
• López Frías, F.J. (2014a). La Filosofía del Deporte Actual. Paradigmas y Corrientes. Roma:(Qua.Pe.G) Università degli Studi di Roma “Foro It”.
• López Frías, F.J. (2014b). William J. Morgan’s “conventionalist internalism” approach. Furthering internalism? A critical hermeneutical response. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1-15. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2014.932430[Crossref]
• Martínková, I., & Parry, J. (2013). Eichberg’s “Phenomenology” of Sport: A Phenomenal Confusion. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 7(3), 331-341.[Crossref]
• McLaughlin, D.W., & Torres, C.R. (2011). Sweet Tension and its Phenomenological Description: Sport, Intersubjectivity and Horizon. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 5(3), 270-284.[Crossref]
• McNamee, M. (2007). Sport, ethics and philosophy: context, history, prospects. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1(1), 1-6.[Crossref]
• McNamee, M.J., & Morgan, W.J. (2015). Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Sport. New York: Routledge.
• Moe, V.F. (2014). The philosophy of sport and continental philosophy. In C.R. Torres (Ed.), Bloomsbury Companion to the Philosophy of Sport, 52-66. London: Bloomsbury.[WoS]
• Morgan, W.J. (1987). The Logical Incompatibility Thesis and Rules: A Reconsideration of Formalism as an Account of Games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 14(1), 1-20. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1987.9714447[Crossref]
• Morgan, W.J. (2012). Broad internalism, deep conventions, moral entrepreneurs, and sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 39(1), 65-100.[WoS]
• Russell, J.S. (1999). Are Rules All an Umpire Has to Work With? Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 26(1), 27-49. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1999.9714577[Crossref]
• Simon, R.L. (2000). Internalism and Internal Values in Sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 27(1), 1-16. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2000.9714586[Crossref]
• Simon, R.L. (2014). Theories of Sport. In C.R. Torres (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to the Philosophy of Sport (pp. 83-98). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.[WoS]
• Suits, B. (2005). The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. Peterborough, Ont: Broadview Press.
• Suits, B. (2007). The elements of sport. In W.J. Morgan (Ed.), Ethics in Sport (pp. 9-19). USA: Human Kinetics, Inc.
• Torres, C.R., McLaughlin, D.W. (2014). Olympism and the Olympic program: an intersubjective moral approach to sport. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 28(2), 353-372.
• Vlastos, G. (1969). “Self-predication” in Plato’s later period. Philosophical Review, 78(1), 74-78.[Crossref]
• Vlastos, G. (1981). Platonic Studies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/pcssr-2015-0018