The Embodied Nature of Autistic Learning: Implications for Physical Education
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and learning difficulties are difficult to separate in clinic manifestations and diagnoses. By taking learning as being-in-the-world, this article considers the embodied nature of autistic learning and urges its importance for understanding the phenomenological core of ASD. We begin by arguing that three mainstream contemporary ASD theories are inherently limited in offering an adequate account of autistic learning due to the disembodied ontology inscribed within them. Then, we provide an understanding of learning guided by the subjective dynamics of experience. Instead of having a disembodied and individualistic point of view, we suggest that autistic learning has an embodied nature. The “inappropriate” or “abnormal” affections and behaviors in the autistic experience of learning may actually be inherently meaningful for individuals with ASD. They strive to make sense of some basic disturbances and re-establish some form of coherence with the world, though this may only be possible in the form of delusions or autistic withdrawals. Finally, we explore the relationship between autistic learning and physical education and suggest in particular how spontaneous imitation can boost the development of children with ASD. We conclude that the application of implicit learning strategies in playful settings and the reduction of explicit strategies based upon intellectual reasoning rather than bodily reciprocity should be encouraged in the process of autistic learning.
- American Psychiatric Association (Eds.). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Retrieved March 11, 2015, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.[Crossref]
- Baker, M.J. (2000). Incorporating the thematic ritualistic behaviors of children with autism into games: increasing social play interactions with siblings. J. Posit. Behav. Intervent., 2, 66-84.
- Barnes, K.A., Howard, J.H.Jr., Howard, D.V., Gilotty, L., Kenworthy, L., Gaillard, W.D., Vaidya, C.J. (2008). Intact implicit learning of spatial context and complex sequences in childhood autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychology, 22(5), 563-570.[WoS][Crossref]
- Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A.M. & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition, 21, 37-46.[Crossref]
- Bodfish, J.W. (2007). Stereotypy, Self-Injury, and Related Abnormal Repetitive Behaviors. In Jacobson, J.W., Mulick, J.A. & Rojahn, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (pp. 481-506). Berlin: Springer Science + Business Media.
- Brown, J., Aczel, B., Jiménez, L., Kaufman, S.B. & Grant, K.P. (2010). Intact implicit learning in autism spectrum conditions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(9), 1789-1812. DOI:10.1080/17470210903536910.[Crossref]
- Carruthers, P. (1996). Simulation and self-knowledge: A defense of theory-theory. In Carruthers, P. & Smith, P.K. (Eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind (pp. 22-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Connolly, M. (2008). The remarkable logic of autism: developing and describing an embedded curriculum based in semiotic phenomenology. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 2(2), 234-256.[Crossref]
- De Jaegher, H. (2013). Embodiment and sense-making in autism. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7, Article 15.
- De Jaegher, H., Di Paulo, E.A. & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 441-447.
- Dickerson, P., Stribling, P. & Rae, J. (2007). Tapping into interaction: how children with autistic spectrum disorders design and place tapping in relation to activities in progress. Gesture, 7, 271-303.[Crossref]
- Dreyfus, H.L. (2002). Intelligence without representation - Merleau-Ponty‟s critique of mental representation. Phenomenology and Cognitive Science, 1, 367-383.
- Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Fuchs, T. (2010). Phenomenology and Psychopathology. In Gallagher, S., & Schmiching, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science (pp. 547-573). Berlin: Springer Science + Business Media.
- Gallagher, S. (1992). Hermeneutics and Education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Gallagher, S. (2004). Understanding interpersonal problems in autism: interaction theory as an alternative to theory of mind. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11(3), 199-217.[Crossref]
- Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Gepner, B. & Mestre, D. (2002). Rapid visual-motion integration deficit in autism. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 455.
- Gipps, R.G.T. (2004). Autism and intersubjectivity: beyond cognitivism and the theory of mind. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11(3), 195-198.[Crossref]
- Goldman, A.I. (2012). Theory of Mind. In Margolis, E., Samuels, R. & Stich, S. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Cognitive Science (pp. 402-424). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Happé, F. (1995). Autism: An Introduction to Psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Hobson, R.P. (1990). On the origins of self and the case of autism. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 163-181.[Crossref]
- Hobson, R.P. (1993). Autism and the Development of Mind. Howe, Sussex: Erlbaum.
- Hobson, R.P. (2010). Explaining autism: Ten reasons to focus on the developing self. Autism, 14(5), 391-407.[Crossref][WoS][PubMed]
- Hung, D. (1978). Using self-stimulation as reinforcement for autistic children. J. Autism Child Schizophr., 8, 355-366.[PubMed]
- Jensen, K.S. (2014). Kropslig situeret læring. Et casestudie af læring i idrætsundervisningen for elever med ASF på Taps skole /Bodily situated learning: a case study of learning in physical education for pupils with ASD at Taps School/. Aarhus: Department of Public Health, Aarhus University.
- Liss, M., Saulnier, C., Fein, D. & Kinsbourne, M. (2006). Sensory and attention abnormalities in autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 10, 155-172.[PubMed][Crossref]
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Oxon: Routledge.
- Mottron, L., Burack, J., Iarocci, G., Belleville, S. & Enns, J. (2003) Locally oriented perception with intact global processing among adolescents with high-functioning autism: evidence from multiple paradigms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(6), 904-913.[Crossref]
- Nadel, J. (2014). How Imitation Boosts Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- O'Loughlin, M. (1996). Embodiment and Education: Exploring Creatural Existence. Berlin: Springer.
- Reber, A.S., Walkenfeld, F.F. & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(5), 888-896.
- Reed, T. & Paterson, C. (1990). A comparative study of autistic subjects‟ performance at two levels of visual and cognitive perspective taking. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 555-68.[Crossref]
- Spiker, M.A., Lin, C.E., Van Dyke, M. & Wood, J.J. (2012). Restricted interests and anxiety in children with autism. Autism, 16, 306-320.[Crossref][PubMed]
- Stanghellini, G. & Ballerini, G. (2004). Autism: Disembodied existence. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11(3), 260.
- Winch, C. (2001). The Philosophy of Human Learning. London: Routledge.
- Zager, D. (2013). Positive Psychology and Autism Spectrum Disorders. In Wehmeyer, M.L. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology and Disability (pp. 494-505). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Zahavi, D. & Parnas, J. (2003). Conceptual problems in infantile autism research: why cognitive science needs phenomenology. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9-10), 53-71.