PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2014 | 10 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

Social psychological predictors of satisfaction with intrapartum and postpartum care – what matters to women in Czech maternity hospitals?

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Objective: To identify the social psychological factors affecting women’s evaluation of care provided in Czech maternity hospitals using following criteria: satisfaction with intrapartum and postpartum care, willingness to return to a given hospital and to recommend the hospital to others. Methods: 762 women completed a 71-item original Czech questionnaire KLI-P designed to measure the psychosocial climate in both delivery and after-birth unit on six scales. The sample was representative of the Czech parturients population. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the predictive value of the questionnaire scales for maternal satisfaction, willingness to return to and to recommend a given hospital. Results: For delivery unit, the satisfaction predictors were: helpfulness and empathy of midwives (Χ2=48.9), communication of information and availability of caregivers (Χ2=16.6), helpfulness and empathy of physicians (Χ2=10.9), symmetrical and respectful attitude of staff members (Χ2=9.7) and physical comfort and services (Χ2=7.6). The predictors of satisfaction with after-birth unit included helpfulness and empathy of the staff (Χ2≥42.1), communication of information and availability of caregivers (Χ2=52.5), physical comfort and services (Χ2=30.6), control and involvement in decision-making (Χ2=6.6) and parity (Χ2=8.6). The factors influencing women’s willingness to return to and to recommend a hospital differed from the predictors of general satisfaction. Conclusions: The satisfaction factors revealed in this research correspond predominantly to the results of studies conducted in other countries (warm, non-formal and supportive approach, sufficient and well-timed provision of information and explanation, availability of caregivers, physical environment). However, participation in decision making, which has been repeatedly shown to be among the strongest predictors of childbirth satisfaction, was not important for the Czech parturients’ satisfaction with intrapartal care. This finding can be explained by different attitudes and expectations of both parturients and caregivers in a post-totalitarian country.
Wydawca

Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
10
Numer
1
Opis fizyczny
Daty
otrzymano
2014-11-11
zaakceptowano
2014-11-28
online
2015-02-02
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Psychology
    Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Charles University, Nám. J. Palacha
    2,116 38, Prague 1, Czech Republic
  • Internal Department II, Faculty of Medicine
    in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic
  • Department of Psychology
    Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Charles University, Nám. J. Palacha
    2,116 38, Prague 1, Czech Republic
  • Department of Psychology
    Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Charles University, Nám. J. Palacha
    2,116 38, Prague 1, Czech Republic
Bibliografia
  • [1] Hojat M, Louis DZ, Maxwell K, Markham F, Wender R, GonnellaJS. Patient perceptions of physician empathy, satisfaction withphysician, interpersonal trust, and compliance. Int J Med Educ2010;1:83-87.[Crossref]
  • [2] Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication andhealth outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995;152:1423-1433.
  • [3] Horwitz RI, Horwitz SM. Adherence to treatment and healthoutcomes. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:1863-1868.[Crossref]
  • [4] Dubina MI, O’Neill JL, Feldman SR. Effect of patient satisfactionon outcomes of care. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res2009;9:393-395.[Crossref]
  • [5] Scott KD, Klaus PH, Klaus MH. The obstetrical and postpartumbenefits of continuous support during childbirth. J WomensHealth Gend Based Med 1999;8:1257-1264.[Crossref]
  • [6] Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous supportfor women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007;3:CD003766.
  • [7] Campbell DA, Lake MF, Falk M, Backstrand JR. A randomizedcontrol trial of continuous support in labor by a lay doula. JObstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006;35:456-464.[Crossref]
  • [8] Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related tochildbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 2004;46:212-219.[Crossref]
  • [9] Redshaw M. Women as consumers of maternity care:measuring “satisfaction” or “dissatisfaction”? Birth2008;35:73-76.
  • [10] Waldenström U, Borg IM, Olsson B, Skold M, Wall S. Thechildbirth experience: a study of 295 new mothers. Birth1996;23:144-153.
  • [11] Singh J. The patient satisfaction concept: a review andreconceptualization. Advances in Consumer Research1989;16:176-179.
  • [12] Bramadat IJ, Driedger M. Satisfaction with childbirth: theoriesand methods of measurement. Birth 1993;20:22-29.
  • [13] Linder-Pelz SU. Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Soc SciMed 1982;16:577-582.[Crossref]
  • [14] Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med1994;38:509-516.[Crossref]
  • [15] Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experienceof childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol2002;186:S160-S172.
  • [16] Stadlmayr W, Amsler F, Lemola S, Stein S, Alt M, Bürgin D,Surbek D, Bitzer J. Memory of childbirth in the second year:the long-term effect of a negative birth experience and itsmodulation by the perceived intranatal relationship withcaregivers. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2006;27:211-224.[Crossref]
  • [17] Takács L, Seidlerová J. Psychosocial climate in maternityhospitals from the perspective of parturients I. Resultsfrom a national survey on perinatal care satisfaction usinga representative sample of 1195 Czech parturients. CeskaGynekol 2013;78:157-168.
  • [18] Takács L, Seidlerová J, Hoskovcová S, Šulová L, Štětovská I,Kolumpková M, et al. Psychosocial aspect of contemporaryCzech obstetrics. The quality of perinatal care fromthe perspective of parturients. Faculty of Arts, CharlesUniversity;2012: ISBN 978-80-7308-431-8.
  • [19] Takács L. The psychosocial needs of newborn children in thecontext of perinatal care. Ceska Gynekol 2012;77:15-21.
  • [20] Štembera Z, Velebil P. Prognosis of the level of perinatal carein the Czech Republic in near future II. From the World HealthOrganization point of view. Ceska Gynekol 2011;76:10-14.
  • [21] Takács L, Smolík F, Sněhotová J., Horáková Hoskovcová S.Diagnostics of the psychosocial climate in maternity hospitals– development and psychometric evaluation of the KLI-PQuestionnaire. Cesk Psychol 2013;57:73-91.
  • [22] Brown S, Lumley J. Satisfaction with care in labor and birth: asurvey of 790 Australian women. Birth 1994;21:4-13.
  • [23] Séguin L, Therrien R, Champagne F, Larouche D. Thecomponents of women’s satisfaction with maternity care. Birth1989;16:109-113.
  • [24] Waldenström U, Rudman A, Hildingsson I. Intrapartum andpostpartum care in Sweden: women’s opinions and riskfactors for not being satisfied. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2006;85:551-560.[Crossref]
  • [25] Lerman S, Shahar G, Czarkowski K, Kurshan N, Magriples U,Mayes L, Epperson CN. Predictors of Satisfaction with ObstetricCare in High-risk Pregnancy: The Importance of Patient-Provider Relationship. J Clin Psychol Medical Settings 2007;14:330-334.[Crossref]
  • [26] Wilcock A, Kobayashi L, Murray I. Twenty-five years of obstetricpatient satisfaction in North America: a review of the literature.J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 1997;10:36-47.[Crossref]
  • [27] Slade P, MacPherson SA, Hume A, Maresh M. Expectations,experiences and satisfaction with labour. Br J Clin Psychol1993;32:469-483.[Crossref]
  • [28] Waldenström U, Nilsson CA. Women’s satisfaction withbirth center care: a randomized, controlled study. Birth1993;20:3-13.
  • [29] Hall JA, Dornan MC. Patient sociodemographic characteristicsas predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis.Soc Sci Med 1990;30:811-818.[Crossref]
  • [30] Morhason-Bello IO, Adedokun BO, Ojengbede OA. Socialsupport during childbirth as a catalyst for early breastfeedinginitiation for first-time Nigerian mothers. Int Breastfeed J2009;4:16.[Crossref]
  • [31] Grajeda R, Pérez-Escamilla R. Stress during labor and deliveryis associated with delayed onset of lactation among urbanGuatemalan women. J Nutr 2002;132:3055-3060.
  • [32] Dewey KG. Maternal and fetal stress are associated withimpaired lactogenesis in humans. J Nutr 2001;131:3012S-3015S.
  • [33] Benoit C, Westfall R, Treloar A, Phillips R, Jansson SM. Socialfactors linked to postpartum depression: A mixed-methodslongitudinal study. J Mental Health 2007;16:719-730.[Crossref]
  • [34] Creedy DK, Shochet IM, Horsfall J. Childbirth and thedevelopment of acute trauma symptoms: incidence andcontributing factors. Birth 2000;27:104-111.
  • [35] Olde E, van der Hart O, Kleber R, van Son M. Posttraumaticstress following childbirth: a review. Clin Psychol Rev2006;26:1-16.[Crossref]
  • [36] Czarnocka J, Slade P. Prevalence and predictors ofpost-traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth. Br J ClinPsychol 2000;39:35-51.[Crossref]
  • [37] Bryanton J, Gagnon AJ, Hatem M, Johnston C. Predictors of earlyparenting self-efficacy: results of a prospective cohort study.Nurs Res 2008;57:252-259.[Crossref][WoS]
  • [38] Ayers S, Eagle A, Waring H. The effects of childbirthrelatedpost-traumatic stress disorder on women and theirrelationships: a qualitative study. Psychol Health Med2006;11:389-398.[Crossref]
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_1515_med-2015-0022
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.