PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 22 | 2 | 269-283
Tytuł artykułu

Application Of Biological Indicators For Estimation Of Remediation Of Soil Degraded By Sulphur Industry

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
PL
WYKORZYSTANIE WSKAŹNIKÓW BIOLOGICZNYCH DO OCENY REKULTYWACJI GLEBY ZDEGRADOWANEJ PRZEZ PRZEMYSŁ SIARKOWY
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The study was conducted on an experiment established in the area of the former Sulphur Mine “Jeziorko.” The remediation was applied to a soil-less formation with particle size distribution of weakly loamy sand, strongly acidified and with bad sorptive properties (Corg. - 2.0 g kg−1; pHKCl - 4.3; T - 7.0 cmol(+) kg−1). In the particular treatments of the experiment the following were applied to the soil-less formation: flotation lime and NPK; lime and sewage sludge; sewage sludge; mineral wool (5 cm 50 cm−1), lime and NPK; mineral wool (5 cm 50 cm−1), lime and sewage sludge; mineral wool (500 m3 ha−1), lime and NPK; mineral wool (500 m3 ha−1), lime and sewage sludge. Plots prepared in that manner were then sown with a mix of grasses. The control was the soil with no amendments. The analyses of the soil material comprised assays of the numbers of particular groups of bacteria and fungi, and of their biochemical and enzymatic activities. The study revealed that all the wastes applied for the remediation caused an increase in the numbers of the bacterial groups studied (copiotrophic, oligotrophic, cellulolytic, lipolytic), as well as in the respiration activity and rate of mineralisation of cellulose. That effect was the most pronounced in the case of sewage sludge. In treatments in which sewage sludge was applied, an increase was also observed in the numbers of the studied fungi (fungi on Martin medium, cellulolytic fungi, lipolytic fungi) and in lipase activity. Whereas, the application of the remaining wastes resulted in a slight decrease in the numbers of the fungal groups under analysis. Comparing the mean annual values of the analysed biological, physical, chemical and physicochemical properties it was found that the biological properties were as sensitive, and in the case of certain tests (numbers of cellulolytic and lipolytic bacteria, rate of cellulose mineralisation) even more sensitive indicators of positive changes taking place in the remediated soil.
Wydawca

Rocznik
Tom
22
Numer
2
Strony
269-283
Opis fizyczny
Daty
wydano
2015-06-01
online
2015-09-19
Twórcy
  • Faculty of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland, jolajoniec1@gmail.com
  • Faculty of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland
  • Faculty of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
  • [1] Cavigelli MA, Robertson GP. Ecology. 2000;81:1404-1414. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658.[Crossref]
  • [2] Byun IG, Nam HK, Song SK, Hwang IS, Lee TH, Park TL. Korean J Chem Eng. 2005;22:917-921. DOI: 10.1007/BF02705675.[Crossref]
  • [3] Czaban J, Wróblewska B, Niedźwiecki J, Sułek A. Pol J Environ Stud. 2010;19:1171-1183.
  • [4] Furczak J, Joniec J. Int Agrophys. 2007;21:39-48.
  • [5] Joniec J, Furczak J. Ecol Chem Eng A. 2012;19:7-24. DOI: 10.2428/ecea.2012.19(01)001.[Crossref]
  • [6] Margesin R, Zimmerbauer A, Schinner F. Chemosphere. 2000;40:339-346. DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00218-0.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • [7] Parham JA, Deng SP, Da HN, Sun HY, Raun WR. Biol Fertil Soils. 2003;38:209-215. DOI: 10.1007/500374-003-0657-7.[Crossref]
  • [8] Płaza G, Nałęcz-Jawecki G, Pinyakong O, Illmer P, Margesin R. Environ Monit Assess. 2010;163:477-488. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-0851-7.[Crossref][PubMed]
  • [9] Taylor JP, Wilson B, Mills MS, Burns RG. Soil Biol Biochem. 2002;34:387-401. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00199-7.[Crossref]
  • [10] Whitelaw-Weckert MA, Rahman L, Hutton RJ, Coombes N. Appl Soil Ecol. 2007;36:224-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.03.003.[Crossref]
  • [11] Wolna-Maruwka A, Niewiadomska A, Klama J. Pol J Environ Stud. 2009;18:931-939.
  • [12] Wyszkowska J, Kucharski J, Borowik A, Boros E. J Element. 2008;13:443-454.
  • [13] Hill GT, Mitkowski NA, Aldrich-Wolfe L, Emele LR, Jurkonie DD, Ficke A, et al. Appl Soil Ecol. 2000;15:25-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0929.[Crossref]
  • [14] Dąbek-Szreniawska M, Hajnos M, Stotzky G, Collins Y, Malicki J. Int Agrophys. 2006;20:277-288.
  • [15] Foght J, Aislabie J. Enumeration of Soil Microorganisms. In: Margesin R, Schinner F, editors. Manual of Soils Analysis. Part 5. Monitoring and Assessing Soil Bioremediation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2005.
  • [16] Kuzyakov Y. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:425-448. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.020.[Crossref]
  • [17] Bastida F, Kandeler E, Moreno JL, Ros M, Garcia C, Hernandez T. Appl Soil Ecol. 2008;40:318-329. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.05.007.[Crossref]
  • [18] Garcia-Gil JC, Plaza C, Senesi N, Brunetki G. Biol Fertil Soils. 2004;39:320-328. DOI: 10.1007/500374-003-0709-z.[Crossref]
  • [19] Nicolas C, Hernandez T, Garcia C. Organic amendments as strategy to increase organic matter in particle-size fractions of a semi-arid soil. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;57:50-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.018.[Crossref][WoS]
  • [20] Pascual JA, Garcia C, Hernandez T, Moreno JL, Ros M. Soil Biol Biochem. 2000;32:1877-1883. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00161-9.[Crossref]
  • [21] Ros M, Hernandez MT, Garcia C. Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35:463-469. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)002983.[Crossref]
  • [22] Franco-Otero VG, Soler-Rovira P, Hernandez D, Lopez-de-Sa E, Plaza C. Biol Fertil Soils. 2012;48:205-216. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-011-0620-y.[Crossref]
  • [23] Furczak J. Pol J Soil Sci. 1989;22:73-80.
  • [24] Wolińska A, Stępniewska Z. Microorganisms abundance and dehydrogenase activity as a consequence of soil reoxidation process. In: Miransari M, editor. Soil Till Microb Activ. Singpost Research, India; 2011.
  • [25] Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P. Enzyme activities and microbial and biochemical processes in soil. In: Burns RG, Dick RP editors. Enzymes in the Environment. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002.
  • [26] Panuthai T, Sihanonth P, Piapukiew J, Sooksai S, Sangvanich P, Karnchanatat A. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2012;6:2622-2638. DOI: 10.5897/AJMRII965.[Crossref]
  • [27] Motowicka-Terelak T, Terelak H. Pol J Soil Sci. 2000;33:39-45.
  • [28] Bunt JB, Rovira AD. Soil Sci. 1955;6:119-128.[Crossref]
  • [29] Martin J. Soil Sci. 1950;19:215-233.[Crossref]
  • [30] Pochon J, Tardieux O. Techniqes d’analyse en microbiologie du sol. Inst. Pasteur, Edit. De la Tourelle, Saint - Mande (Seine): Paris; 1962.
  • [31] Burbianka M, Pliszka A, Janczura E, Teisseyer T, Załęska H. Microbiology of food. PZWL: Warszawa; 1971.
  • [32] Rühling A, Tyler G. Oikos. 1973;24:402-415.[Crossref]
  • [33] Pokorna V. Method of determining the lipolytic activity of upload and lowland. Pochvovedenie. 1964;106:85-87.
  • [34] Kuhnert-Finkernagel R, Kandeler E. Lipase activity by titration. In: Schinner F, Kandeler E, Ohlinger R, Margesin R, editors. Methods in Soil Biology. Berlin Hedelberg New York: Springer-Verlag; 1996.
  • [35] Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson B. Ecology. 2007;88:1354-1364. DOI: 10.1890/05-1839.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • [36] Liang Y, Nicolic M, Peng Y, Chen W, Jiang Y. Soil Biol Biochem. 2005;37:1185-1195. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.017.[Crossref]
  • [37] Scherer HW, Mether DJ, Welp G. Plant Soil Environ. 2011;57:513-518.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_1515_eces-2015-0016
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.