Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The aim of the analysis is to examine the impact of new railway stop openings within suburban railway network on changes in transport behaviors within their respective catchment areas. The study focuses on six railway stations: four located within the Kraków suburban railway network (malopolskie, Poland) and two on the Łódź suburban railway network (lodzkie, Poland). To achieve the stated objective, the spatial context and accessibility of the railway stations were examined, passenger exchange data at the stations were investigated, and surveys among passengers were conducted and analyzed. The selected railway stops were characterized in terms of their spatial location and characteristics, existing transport systems, and the level of integration with other transport modes. The study examined stations established during the development of suburban railway systems, launched at different times: concurrently with the entire railway connection launch and as densification of previously served networks. The limited number of objects included in the study does not allow for unequivocal conclusions on expected increase in transportation, but certainly, in the first two years following their launch, a monthly average increase of 4-6% can be anticipated. Research has confirmed that the most common rail passengers are former users of other means of public transport. The pattern of giving up cars in favor of the train was also confirmed. The outcomes confirm the justification for supplementing agglomeration railway systems with new stops, as this may contribute to a change in modal split. This change may not be noticeable in view of the usually considered large scale of the agglomeration, but on individual corridors in a micro scale it may have a very positive impact on the traffic situation and change the quality of travel. Results can be used to forecast changes in travel behaviors for planned railway stations and to determine their potential benefits.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
89--108
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 48 poz., tab., wykr., plany
Twórcy
- Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland
- Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland
autor
- Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. Adolphson, M., & Froidh, O. (2019). Impact on urban form by the localization of railway stations: Evidence from Sweden. Cities, 95, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.031.
- 2. Baum-Snow, N., & Kahn, M. (2005). Effects of Urban Rail Transit Expansions: Evidence from Sixteen Cities, 1970-2000. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 2005(1), 147-206. http://doi.org/10.1353/urb.2006.0001.
- 3. Brown, B.B., & Werner, C.M. (2010). The Residents’ Benefits and Concerns Before and After a New Rail Stop: Do Residents Get What They Expect? Environment and Behavior, 43(6), 789-805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510392030.
- 4. Centrum Unijnych Projektów Transportowych (2022). Transportowe Obserwatorium Badawcze - Kolej aglomeracyjna 2022: potrzeby i oczekiwania, trudności i bariery, 1-47. Retrieved from https://www.cupt.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/kolej-aglomeracyjna-2022-potrzeby-i-oczeki-wania-trudnosci-i-bariery-publikacja-tob-12_536.pdf
- 5. Ciaston-Ciulkin, A., Puławska-Obiedowska S., & Sobon M. (2023). Nowe przystanki kolejowe jako szansa na zwiększanie roli kolei w obsłudze transportowej aglomeracji. In Nowoczesne Technologie i Systemy Zarządzania w Transporcie Szynowym Novkol 2023 (21-39). SITK RP Oddział w Krakowie.
- 6. Ciaston-Ciulkin, A., Pulawska-Obiedowska, S., Trzebunia, A. (2024). Badanie znaczenia kolei w pod-rozach wewnatrzmiejskich na przykładzie rejonu osiedla Złocien w Krakowie, Transport Miejski i Regionalny, 1, 20-24.
- 7. Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2008). A Stated Preference Experiment for Measuring Service Quality in Public Transport. Transportation Planning and Technology, 31(5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060802364471
- 8. Forouhar, A., & Van Lierop, D. (2021). If you build it, they will change: Evaluating the impact of commuter rail stations on real estate values and neighborhood composition in the Rotterdam – The Hague metropolitan area, the Netherlands. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 14(1), 949-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2021.1795.
- 9. Giansoldati, M., Danielis, R., & Rotaris, L. (2021). Train-feeder modes in Italy. Is there a role for active mobility? Research in Transportation Economics, 86, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100990.
- 10. Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2007). The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel. Transport Policy, 14(5), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.004
- 11. Hamacher, W.H., Liebers, A., Schoebel, A., Wagner, D., & Wagner, F. (2001). Locating New Stops in a Railway Network. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 50(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0661(04)00162-8.
- 12. Ibrahim A., Borhan M., Izzi N., & Ismail, A. (2020). Rail-based public transport service quality and user satisfaction - a literature review. Promet - Traffic & Transportation, 32(3), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v32i3.3270.
- 13. Ingvardson, J.B., & Nielsen O.A. (2022). The influence of vicinity to stations, station characteristics and perceived safety on public transport mode choice: a case study from Copenhagen. Public Transport, 14, 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-021-00285-x.
- 14. Jaafar Sidek, M.F., Bakri, F.A., Kadar Hamsa, A.A., Nik Othman, N.N.A., Mohd Noor, N., & Ibrahim, M. (2020). Socio-economic and Travel Characteristics of transit users at Transit-oriented Development (TOD) Stations. Transportation Research Procedia 48, 1931-1955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.225.
- 15. Jehle, U., Coetzee, C., Buttner, B., Pajares, E., & Wulfhorst, G. (2022). Connecting people and places: Analysis of perceived pedestrian accessibility to railway stations by Bavarian case studies. Journal of Urban Mobility, 2, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100025.
- 16. Jurik, D., & Janos, V. (2023). Different aspects influencing modal split, from view of sustainable development and reducing of greenhouse gas emissions. Trans Motauto World, 8(2), 49-52.
- 17. Kotula, L. (2020). Rola i dostępność Szybkiej Kolei Aglomeracyjnej w terenach objętych suburbanizacją na przykladzie polaczenia kolejowego Kraków – Miechów. Urban Development Issues, 66, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.2478/udi-2020-0011
- 18. Kulpa, T., Kulas, S., & Popadiak, B. (2017). Zmiany zachowań komunikacyjnych pasażerów po uruchomieniu Szybkiej Kolei Aglomeracyjnej w Małopolsce, Transport Miejski i Regionalny, 9, 5-10.
- 19. Lahoorpoor, B., & Levinson, D. M. (2020). Catchment if you can: The effect of station entrance and exit locations on accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtran-geo.2019.102556
- 20. La Paix, L., Cherchi, E., Geurs, K. (2021). Role of perception of bicycle infrastructure on the choice of the bicycle as a train feeder mode. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15, 486-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1765223.
- 21. Li, W., Zhou, M., & Dong, H. (2020). Classifications of stations in urban rail transit based on the two-step cluster. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing, 26(3), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2020.013930
- 22. Lu, Y., Prato, C.G., Sipe, N., Kimpton, A., & Corcoran, J. (2022). The role of household modality style in first and last mile travel mode choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 158, 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.003
- 23. Midenet, S., Come, E., & Papon, F. (2018). Modal shift potential of improvements in cycle access to exurban train stations. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(4), 743-752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.09.004
- 24. Nosal, K., & Starowicz, W. (2015). Evaluation of influence of mobility management instruments implemented in separated areas of the city on the changes in modal split. Archives of Transport, 35(3), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1185186.
- 25. Ouali, L., Graham, D., Barron, A., Trompet, M. (2020). Gender Differences in the Perception of Safety in Public Transport. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 183(3), 737-769. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12558.
- 26. Pueboobpaphan, R., Pueboobpaphan, S., & Sukhotra, S. (2022). Acceptable walking distance to transit stations in Bangkok, Thailand: Application of a stated preference technique. Journal of Transport Geography, 99, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103296 .
- 27. Polom, M., Tarkowski, M., Puzdrakiewicz, K., & Abramovic, B. (2018). Urban Transformation in the Context of Rail Transport Development: The Case of a Newly Built Railway Line in Gdansk (Poland). Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1218041.
- 28. Pongprasert, P. (2020). Understanding the Choice of Residential Location Near Transit Stations and Urban Rail Commuting: A Case Study Of Transit-Oriented Development In Bangkok. International review for spatial planning and sustainable development A: Planning Strategies and Design Concepts, 8(4), 75-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.14246/irspsda.8.4_75
- 29. Rojas, A. (2024). Train stations’ impact on housing prices: Direct and indirect effects. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 181, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.103979.
- 30. Salov, A., & Semerikova E. (2023). Transportation and urban spatial structure: Evidence from Paris. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(6), 1248-1273. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231202551.
- 31. Rosetti, S., Tiboni, M., Vetturi, D., Zazzi, M., & Caselli, B. (2020). Measuring Pedestrian Accessibility to Public Transport in Urban Areas: a GIS-based Discretisation Approach. European Transport, 76, 1-12.
- 32. Sarker, R.I., Mailer, M., & Sikder, S.K. (2020). Walking to a public transport station: Empirical evidence on willingness and acceptance in Munich, Germany. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-07-2017-0031.
- 33. Sheikholeslami, A., Langeroodi, A.H.T., & Karimi, N. (2023). Urban Passenger Hub Stations classification, Based on Public Transportation Network Interchanges [Paper presentation]. 1st International Conference on Applied Researches in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning, Munich, Germany (1-11). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373421835.
- 34. Tennoy, A., Knapskog, M., & Wolday, F. (2022). Walking distances to public transport in smaller and larger Norwegian cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 103, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103169.
- 35. Tivang, M. (2023). Rail transits effect on population growth. A comparison between different rail transit types [Master’s thesis, Umea University] (1-30). Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1765026/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
- 36. Theerathitichaipa, K., Wisutwattanasak, P., Se, C., Seefong, M., Jomnonkwao, S., Champahom, T., Ratanavaraha, V., & Kasemsri, R. (2024). Assessment of Disparity in Accessing Railway Stations in Thailand: an Application Geographic Information System Network Analysis. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 8, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-023-00168-8.
- 37. Trolese, M., De Fabiis, F., & Coppola, P. (2023). A Walkability Index including Pedestrians’ Perception of Built Environment: The Case Study of Milano Rogoredo Station. Sustainability, 15(22), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115389.
- 38. Tsumita, N., Kikuchi, H., Vichiensan, V., Fillone, A., Tuan, V.A., Linh, H.T., Pawar, D.S., & Fukuda, A. (2023). Urban railway network expansion on transit oriented development: Improvement in accessibility in four Asian developing cities. Asian Transport Studies, 9, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eastsj.2023.100097.
- 39. Urzad Transportu Kolejowego. (2021). Koleje pasazerskie w wojewodztwach: Dynamika zmian w latach 2010 – 2020. 1-40. Retrieved from https://dane.utk.gov.pl/download/1/63480/Kolejepasazer-skiewwojewodztwach.pdf
- 40. Van Hagen, M. (2015). Effect of Station Improvement Measures on Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 3(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2142/2015.01.002.
- 41. Vichiensan, V., Wasuntarasook, V., Prakayaphun, T., Kii, M., & Hayashi, Y. (2023). Influence of Urban Railway Network Centrality on Residential Property Values in Bangkok. Sustainability, 15(22), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152216013.
- 42. Wang, J., Lu, Y., Yang, Y., Peng, J., Liu, Y., & Yang, L. (2023). Influence of a new rail transit line on travel behavior: Evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys in Hong Kong. Journal of Transport Geography, 106, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103526.
- 43. Wolowiec, P. (2021). Systemy kolei aglomeracyjnych w Polsce. Transport Miejski i Regionalny, 6, 23-30.
- 44. Yang, L., Chen, Y., Xu, N., Zhao, R., Chau, K.W., & Hong, S. (2020). Place-varying impacts of urban rail transit on property prices in Shenzhen, China: Insights for value capture. Sustainable Cities and Society, 58, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102140.
- 45. Zeng, Z., Wang, M., Gao, X., & Wang, N. (2024). Exploring Passenger Satisfaction in Multimodal Railway Hubs: A Social Media-Based Analysis of Travel Behavior in China’s Major Rail Stations. Sustainability, 16(12), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124881.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-dfef46eb-32d4-4e5d-b62d-8574feaa1684
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.