Narzędzia help

Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
cannonical link button


Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering

Tytuł artykułu

DIFFRACT: DIaphyseal Femur FRActure Classifier SysTem

Autorzy Bayram, F.  Çakıroğlu, M. 
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji EN
EN Determining the types of fractured bones is the most important step of fracture treatment. Different fracture cases may be observed in daily life and each of them may require a specific treatment. It is not possible for a physician to know all fracture types and treatment methods by heart. Therefore, it is needed an effective solution to facilitate such a tedious process. Based on this need, we propose an auxiliary tool called a DIaphyseal Femur FRActure Classifier SysTem (DIFFRACT). The DIFFRACT can automatically classify diaphyseal femur fractures according to the Müller AO Classification system on X-ray images. In DIFFRACT, we have used the Niblack thresholding method to segment X-ray images. We have observed that Niblack is the most effective method for the segmentation of fractured bones since it does not lose information related to the fracture region. Moreover, we have developed a novel pre-processing method called a support vector machine (SVM) based sensitive noise remover to remove the noises occurring in the segmentation step. In addition, we have innovatively proposed two combined feature extraction methods, the bone completeness indicator (BCI) and fractured region mapping (FRM), to classify different types of fractures. We have used a multi-class SVM to determine the type of bone fractures. Based on the detailed experiments, 196 X-ray images were classified into nine classes according to AO-32 with 89.87% success rate. The DIFFRACT may be used as supplementary tool for the determination of fractured femur bones by physicians. It may facilitate decision making process of the physicians.
Słowa kluczowe
PL komputerowe wspomaganie diagnozy   przetwarzanie obrazu   maszyna wektorów wspierających  
EN femoral diaphyseal fracture   computer aided diagnosis   classification   image processing   support vector machine (SVM)  
Wydawca Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Czasopismo Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering
Rocznik 2016
Tom Vol. 36, no. 1
Strony 157--171
Opis fizyczny Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
autor Bayram, F.
  • Department of Electronic and Computer Education, Institute of Natural Sciences, Sakarya University, Esentepe Kampüsü, 54187 Sakarya, Turkey,
autor Çakıroğlu, M.
  • Department of Mechatronic Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Sakarya University, Esentepe Kampüsü, Sakarya, Turkey,
[1] Marolt D, Knezevic M, Novakovic GV. Bone tissue engineering with human stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther 2010;1:10–1.
[2] Graham TJ, Bamberger HB, Calandruccio JH, Wiedrich TA, Focht LM. Bone plate extender and extension system for bone restoration and methods of use thereof; 2014, [accessed 04.10.15].
[3] Umadevi N, Geethalakshmi DS. A brief study on human bone anatomy and bone fractures. IJCES Int J Comput Eng Sci Vol 2011;1:93–104.
[4] Gamage P, Xie SQ, Delmas P, Xu WL. Diagnostic radiograph based 3D bone reconstruction framework: application to the femur. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2011;35:427–37.
[5] Müller ME, Koch P, Nazarian S, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990. p. 106–15.
[6] Dirschl DR, Cannada LK. Classification of fractures. Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 39–52.
[7] Jiang Y, Babyn P. X-ray bone fracture segmentation by incorporating global shape model priors into geodesic active contours. Int Congr Ser 2004;1268:219–24.
[8] Ding F, Leow WK, Howe TS. Automatic segmentation of femur bones in anterior–posterior pelvis X-ray images. Comput Anal Images Patterns 2007;205–12.
[9] Pilgram R, Walch C, Blauth M, Jaschke W, Schubert R, Kuhn V. Knowledge-based femur detection in conventional radiographs of the pelvis. Comput Biol Med 2008;38:535–44.
[10] Benjelloun M, Mahmoudi S. X-ray image segmentation for vertebral mobility analysis. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2008;2:371–83.
[11] Ribeiro EA, Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Rangayyan RM, Azevedo- Marques PM. Detection of vertebral plateaus in lateral lumbar spinal X-ray images with Gabor filters. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. EMBC 2010 Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE; 2010. pp. 4052–5.
[12] Somkantha K, Theera-Umpon N, Auephanwiriyakul S. Bone age assessment in young children using automatic carpal bone feature extraction and support vector regression. J Digit Imaging 2011;24:1044–58.
[13] Lindner C, Thiagarajah S, Wilkinson JM, Wallis GA, Cootes TF. Accurate fully automatic femur segmentation in pelvic radiographs using regression voting. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2012;353–60.
[14] Tian TP, Chen Y, Leow WK, Hsu W, Howe TS, Png MA. Computing neck-shaft angle of femur for X-ray fracture detection. Comput Anal Images Patterns 2003;82–9.
[15] Yap DWH, Chen Y, Leow WK, Howe TS, Png MA. Detecting femur fractures by texture analysis of trabeculae. ICPR Proc. 17th Int. Conf. On Pattern Recognit., vol. 3; 2004. pp. 730–3.
[16] Lim SE, Xing Y, Chen Y, Leow WK, Howe TS, Png MA. Detection of femur and radius fractures in X-ray images. Proc 2nd Int Conf Adv. Med. Signal Info Proc. 2004. pp. 249–56.
[17] Donnelley MW. Computer aided long-bone segmentation and fracture detection.[Ph.D. thesis] Flinders University of South Australia; 2008.
[18] Smith R, Ward K, Cockrell C, Ha J, Najarian K. Detection of fracture and quantitative assessment of displacement measures in pelvic X-ray images. Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 2010. pp. 682–5.
[19] Linda CH, Jiji GW. Crack detection in X-ray images using fuzzy index measure. Appl Soft Comput 2011;11:3571–9.
[20] Chai HY, Wee LK, Swee TT, Hussain S, Ariff AK. Gray-level co-occurrence matrix bone fracture detection. Am J Appl Sci 2011;8:26–32.
[21] Wei Z, Liming Z. Study on recognition of the fracture injure site based on X-ray images. CISP 2010 3rd Int. Congr. On Image Signal Process, vol. 4; 2010. pp. 1947–50.
[22] Funk MW, El-Kwae EA, Kellam JF. Towards automated bone fracture classification. Med Imaging 2001;4322.
[23] Charles M. Femoral diaphyseal fractures. Skelet Trauma 2003, SkeletalTrauma/ch52.pdf [accessed 04.10.15].
[24] Müller ME, Müller AO. Classification of fractures-long bones; 2004, class.pdf [accessed 04.10.15].
[25] Niblack W. An introduction to image processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986. p. 115–6.
[26] Chang C-C, Lin C-J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines; 2001, [accessed 04.10.15].
[27] Kuo CY, Freeman RB. Imaging indices for quantification of shape, angularity, and surface texture of aggregates, Washington D.C.; 2000;686.
[28] Kuo CY, Frost JD, Lai JS, Wang LB. Three-dimensional image analysis of aggregate particles from orthogonal projections. Transp Res Rec 1996;98–103.
[29] Mora CF, Kwan KH. Sphericity, shape factor, and convexity measurement of coarse aggregates for concrete using digital image processing. Cem Concr Res 2000;30:351–8.
[30] Özen M. Investigation of relationship between aggregate shape parameters and concrete strength using imaging techniques.[Master thesis] Middle East Technical University; 2007.
[31] Samet H, Tamminen M. Efficient component labeling of images of arbitrary dimension represented by linear bintrees. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1988;10:579.
[32] Maurer C, Qi R, Raghavan V. A linear time algorithm for computing exact euclidean distance transforms of binary images in arbitrary dimensions. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2003;25:265–70.
[33] Sahoo PK, Soltani S, Wong KC, Chen YC. A survey of thresholding techniques. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 1998;41:233–60.
[34] Ibanez L, Schroeder W, Ng L, Cates J. The ITK software guide; 2003, [accessed 04.10.15].
[35] Manual O. Open Source Computer Vision Library. Intel Corp USA; 1999, [accessed 04.10.15].
PL Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.
Kolekcja BazTech
Identyfikator YADDA bwmeta1.element.baztech-bf9cd542-017d-4da3-8d54-8867db0c48d4
DOI 10.1016/j.bbe.2015.10.003