Narzędzia help

Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
first last
cannonical link button

http://yadda.icm.edu.pl:80/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-PWA7-0037-0028

Czasopismo

Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Transport

Tytuł artykułu

Kierunki rozwoju nowoczesnych systemów zarządzania ruchem lotniczym na świecie

Autorzy Malarski, M.  Piętek, M. 
Treść / Zawartość http://www.wt.pw.edu.pl/index.php/Badania-i-nauka/Prace-Naukowe-Politechniki-Warszawskiej-Transport
Warianty tytułu
EN Perspective of new air traffic management systems developing
Języki publikacji PL
Abstrakty
PL Wykorzystywane współcześnie metody zachowania separacji pomiędzy uczestnikami ruchu lotniczego zbudowane zostaty z wykorzystaniem istniejącej sieci dróg lotniczych oraz metody kontroli wywodzącej się z kontroli proceduralnej. Kontrolerzy ruchu lotniczego stanowią nierozłączny element tego procesu z uwagi na ich zdolność do gromadzenia informacji oraz podejmowania decyzji. Przyszłością systemów zarządzania ruchem lotniczym jest swobodna nawigacja nietrasowa. Planowanie nietrasowej trajektorii 4D powinno pozwalać na pełną weryfikację bezkolizyjności tras lotu samolotów.
EN The new methods of air traffic separation assurance are based on the airways structures and former procedural control rules. Air traffic controllers, having the complete traffic situation awareness are the main decision makers in the process. The next generation air traffic management systems will enable navigation of economical, direct 4D trajectories with number of automation tools, supporting air traffic controllers in midterm verification of aircraft trajectory collisions.
Słowa kluczowe
PL system transportowy   ruch lotniczy   inżynieria ruchu lotniczego  
EN transport system   air traffic   air traffic engineering  
Wydawca Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej
Czasopismo Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Transport
Rocznik 2009
Tom z. 71
Strony 173--194
Opis fizyczny Bibliogr. 66 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor Malarski, M.
autor Piętek, M.
  • Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Transportu
Bibliografia
1. Akl Y., Dean T., Powley W., Shepard T.: A Conflict Prediction Algoritlim Using Intent Information. Annual AirTraffic Control Association Conference, 1991.
2. Alliot J., Chansou O., Durand N.: Optimal Resolution of En Route Conflicts. Air Traffic Control Ouarterly 3(3), pp. 139-161, 1995.
3. Altman S., Burgess D., Wood M. L.: TCAS: Maneuvering Aircraft in the Horizontal Plane. Lincoln Laboratory Journal, 7 (2), 1994.
4. Andrews J. W., Welch J. D.: Safety Analysis for Advanced Separation Concepts. USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, 2005.
5. Bach R., Chan W., Mc Nally B.: Field Test Evaluation of the CTAS Conflict Prediction and Trial Planning Capability. A1AA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 1686-1697, 1998.
6. Bakker G., Blom H.: Air Traffic Collision Risk Modeling. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 2, 1993.
7. Bateman D.: The Introduction of Enhanced Ground-proximity Warning Systems EGPWS in to Civil Aviation Operations Around the World. Annual European Aviation Safety Seminar, 1999.
8. Beers J., de Jong K., Kauppinen S., Vink A.: Medium Term Conflict Detection in EATCH1P Phase III. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, pp. 9.3^15 - 9.3-52, 1997.
9. Bilimoria K., Chatterji G., Sridhar B.: Effects of Conflict Resolution Maneuvers and Traffic Density of Free Flight. A1AA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, 1996.
10. Bilimoria K. D., Grabbe S. R., Lee H. Q., Sheth K. S.: Performance Evaluation of Airborne Separation Assurance for Free Fight. Air Traffic Control Qarterly 11(2), pp.85-102, 2003.
11. Blom H., Heuvelink G.: An Alternative Method to Solve a Variational Inequality Applied to an Air Traffic Control Example. Analysis and Optimization of Systems, 1988.
12. Bole A. G., Coenen F. P., Smeaton G. P.: Knowledge-based Collision Avoidance. The Journal of Navigation 42 (l), 1989.
13. Bonn J., Fuller L, Howell D., Hustache J. C., Kettunen T., Knorr D.: Flight Efficiency Studies in Europe and the United States. USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, 2005.
14. Brodegard W., Ryan P.: New Collision Avoidance Device Is Based on Simple and Passive Design to Keep the Cost Low. ICAO Journal 52(4), 1997.
15. Brudnicki D., Lindsay K., Mc Farland A.: Assessment of Field Trials, Algorithmic Performance, and Benefits of the User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) Conflict Probe. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, pp. 9.3-35 - 9.3-44, 1997.
16. Burdun L, Parfentyey O.: A Knowledge Model for Self-organizing Conflict Prevention/ Resolution in Close Free-flight Airspace. IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 409-428, 1999.
17. Carpenter B., Kuchar J. K.: Probability-based Collision Alerting Logic for Closely-spaced Parallel Approach. AIAA Aerospace, Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1997.
18. Chakravarthy A., Ghose D.: Obstacle Avoidance in a Dynamic Environment: A Collision Cone Approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 28, pp. 562-574, 1998.
19. Duong V. N., Hoffman E. G.: Conflict Resolution Advisory Service in Autonomous Aircraft Operations. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, pp. 9.3-10 - 9.3-17, 1997.
20. Eby M., Kelly W.: Free Flight Separation Assurance Using Distributed Algorithms. IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 429-441, 1999.
21. Erzberger H., Paielli R.: Conflict Probability Estimation for Free Flight. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 20(3), 1997.
22. Federal Aviation Administration: Precision Runway Monitor Demonstration Report, Document DOT/FAA/RD-91/5, 1991.
23. [43] Feron E., Frazzoli E., Mao Z. H., Oh J. H.: Resolution of Conflicts Involving Many Aircraft via Semi-definite Programming. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 24(1), pp. 79-86, 2001.
24. Feron E., Oh J. H., Shewchun J. M.: Linear Matrix lnequalities for Free Flight Conflict Problems. IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2417-2422, 1997.
25. Ford R. L.: The Conflict Resolution Process for TCAS11 and Some Simulation Results. The Journal of Navigation40(3), 1987.
26. Ford R. L., Powell D. L.: A New Threat Detection Criterion for Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems. The Journal of Navigation 43(3), 1990.
27. Gazit R.: Aircraft Surveillance and Collision Avoidance Using GPS. Dr Dis., Stanford University, 1996.
28. Gelosi P., Innocenti M., Pollini E.: Air Traffic Management Using Probability Function Fields. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 1088-1097, 1999.
29. van Gent R., Hoekstra J., Ruigrok R.: Conceptual Design of Free Flight with Airborne Separation Assurance. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 807-817, 1997.
30. Guarino S., Harper K., Mehta A., Mulgund S., Zacharias G.: Air Traffic Controller Agent Model for Free Flight. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 288-301, 1999.
31. Hagiwara H., Iijima Y., Kasai H.: Results of Collision Avoidance Maneuver Experiments Using a Knowledge-based Autonomous Piloting System. The Journal of Navigation 44(2), 1991.
32. Havel K., Husarcik J.: A Theory of the Tactical Conflict Prediction of a Pair of Aircraft. The Journal of Navigation 42(3), 1989.
33. Irvine R.: A Geometrical Approach to Conflict Probability Estimation. USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, pp. 1-15, 2001.
34. Kalafus R., Rome H.: Impact of Automatic Dependent Surveillance and Navigation System Accuracy on Collision Risk on Intersecting Tracks. National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, 1988.
35. Kelly W. E.: Conflict Detection and Alerting for Separation Assurance Systems. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1999.
36. Kosecka J., Pappas G., Sastry S., Tomlin C.: Generation of Conflict Resolution Maneuvers for Air Traffic Management. International Conference on Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 1997.
37. Krozel J.: Conflict Detection and Resolution for Future Air Transportation Management. 1997.
38. Krozel J., Peters M.: Conflict Detection and Resolution for Free Flight. Air Traffic Control Quarterly 5(3), pp. 181-212,1997.
39. Kuchar J. K., Yang L. C.: Prototype Conflict Alerting Logic for Free Flight. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 20 (4), pp. 768-773, 1997.
40. Kuchar J. K., Yang L. C.: A Review of Conflict Detection and Resolution Modeling Methods. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 1(4), pp. 179-189, 2000.
41. Lachner R.: Collision Ayoidance as a Differential Game: Real-time Approximation of Optimal Strategies Using Higher Derivatives of the Value Function. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 2308-2313, 1997.
42. Lee D. C., Nagati M., Ota T.: Aircraft Collision Avoidance Trajectory Generation. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 828-837, 1998.
43. Love D.: TCAS III: Bringing Operational Compatibility to Airborne Collision Avoidance. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1988.
44. Lygeros J., Nilim A., Prandini M., Sastry S.: A Probabilistic Framework for Aircraft Conflict Detection. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and ControI Conference, pp. 1047-1057, 1999.
45. Malarski M.: Inżynieria ruchu lotniczego, OW PW, Warszawa 2006.
46. Malarski M., Piątek M.: Dynamiczne wyznaczanie trajektorii lotu nietrasowego dla zadania szeregowania samolotów lądujących, Badania operacyjne i systemowe 2004 - Zastosowania, AOW EXIT, str. 319-328, Warszawa 2004.
47. Malarski M., Piątek M.: Infrastruktura techniczna dla lotów swobodnych w przestrzeni kontrolowanej - koncepcje europejskie i amerykańskie, Systemy Logistyczne - teoria i praktyka, str. 381-386, Warszawa 2005.
48. Menon P. K., Sridhar B., Sweriduk G. D.: Optimal Strategies for Free-flight Air Traffic Conflict Resolution. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 22(2), pp. 202-211, 1999.
49. Niedringhaus W. P.: Maneuver Option Manager: Automated Simplification of Complex Air Traffic Control Problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 22, pp. 1047-1057, 1992.
50. Niedringhaus W. P.: Stream Option Manager (SOM): Automated Integration of Aircraft Separation, Merging, Stream Management and Other Air Traffic Control Functions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 25, 1995.
51. Radio Technical Committee on Aeronautics: Minimum Performance Standards - Airborn Ground Proximity Warning Equipment, Document No. RTCA/DO-161A, 1976.
52. Radio Technical Committee on Aeronautics: Minimum Performance Specifications for TCAS Airborne Equipment, Document No. RTCA/DO-185, 1983.
53. Ratcliffe S.: Automatic Conflict Detection Logic for Future Air Traffic Control. The Journal of Navigation 42(3), 1989.
54. Roy S., Sridhar B., Verghese G. C.: An Aggregate Dynamic Stochastic Model for an Air Traffic System. USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, 2003.
55. Skorupski J.: Metody wymiarowania bezpieczeństwa ruchu lotniczego, PN PW Transport z. 66, Warszawa 2008.
56. Scanlon C., Walker M.,: Proceedings of the NASA Workshop on flight deck centered parallel runway approaches in instrument meteorological conditions. NASA No. 10191, Hampton, 1996.
57. Schiefele J., von Viebahn H.: A Method for Detecting and Avoiding Flight Hazards. SPIE Meeting on Enhanced and Synthetic Vision, pp. 50-56, 1997.
58. Schild R.: Rule Optimization for Airborne Aircraft Separatio. Dr Dis., Technical University of Vienna 1998.
59. Schulz R. L., Zhao Y.: Deterministic Resolution of Two Aircraft Conflict in Free Flight. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 469-478, 1997.
60. Stengel R. F., Wangermann J. P.: Principled Negotiation Between Intelligent Agents: a Model for Air Traffic Management. ICAS Proceedings, pp. 2197-2207, 1994.
61. Taylor D. H.: Uncertainty in Collision Avoidance Maneuvering. The Journal of Navigation 43(2), 1990.
62. Tomlin C., Pappas G., Sastry S.: Conflict Resolution for Air Traffic Management: A Study in Multi-agent Hybrid Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 43, pp. 509-521, 1998.
63. Warren A.: Medium Term Conflict Detection for Free Routing: Operational Concepts and Requirements Analysis. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, pp. 9.3-27-9.3-34, 1997.
64. Williams P. R.: Aircraft Collision Avoidance Using Statistical Decision Theory. Sensors and Sensor Systems for Guidance and Navigation II, 1992.
65. Zeghal K.: Towards the Logic of an Airborne Collision Avoidance System which Ensures Coordination with Multiple Cooperative Intruders. CAS Proceedings 3. pp. 2208-2218, 1994.
66. Zeghal K.: A Review of Different Approaches Based on Force Fields for Airborne Conflict Resolution. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, pp. 818-827, 1998.
Kolekcja BazTech
Identyfikator YADDA bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-PWA7-0037-0028
Identyfikatory