Morphological and photosynthetic acclimation of Potamogeton perfoliatus to different environments in Lake Balaton

• Autorzy: Tóth V.R. , Vári A. , Lugossi S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Comparative significance and synchronicity of morphological and photosynthetic adjustments of Potamogeton perfoliatus to shore-specific environments were examined on plants growing at the maximum depth of colonisation of the northern and southern shores of Lake Balaton. The shore-specific environments did not affect photophysiological parameters: the photosynthesis of plants on both shores was high, coupled with low respiration and compensation irradiances. In contrast, morphological and habitual differences between the shores were significant: plants of the shady, northern shore had lighter, but larger leaves, and longer internodes concentrated in the apex of the plants. Thus, photophysiological variability of Potamogeton does not follow its morphological differentiation.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

morphology; photosynthesis; Potamogeton perfoliatus; Balaton lake; acclimation; light

• Wydawca: Institute of Oceanography University of Gdańsk
• Czasopismo: Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 40, No.3
• Strony: 43--51
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Tóth V.R.

autor

Vári A.

autor

Lugossi S.

• Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Balaton Limnological Research Institute Klebelsberg Kuno út 3, Tihany, HUNGARY, H-8237,

Bibliografia

• 1.Abernethy V.J., Sabbatini M.R., Murphy K.J. 1996. Response of Elodea canadensis Michx, and Myriophyllum spicatum L. to shade, cutting and competition in experimental culture. Hydrobiologia, 340, 219-224.
• 2.Asaeda, T., Sultana M., Manatunge J., Fujino T., 2004, The effect of epiphytic algae on the growth and production of Potamogeton perfoliatus L. in two light conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot., 52, 225-238.
• 3.Baier T., Neuwirth E., 2007, Excel :: COM :: R. Computation. Stat., 22, 91-108.
• 4.Barko J., Hardin D.G., Matthews M.S., 1982, Growth and morphology of submersed freshwater macrophytes in relation to light and temperature. Can. J. Bot., 60, 877-887.
• 5.Bassow S.L., Bazzaz F.A., 1997, Intra-and inter-specific variation in canopy photosynthesis in a mixed deciduous forest. Oecologia, 109, 507-515.
• 6.Bowes G., Salvucci M.E., 1989, Plasticity in the photosynthetic carbon metabolism of submersed aquatic macrophytes. Aquat. Bot., 34, 233-266.
• 7.Caffrey J.M., Kemp W.M., 1991, Seasonal and spatial patterns of oxygen production, respiration and root-rhizome release in Potamogeton perfoliatus L. and Zostera marina L. Aquat. Bot., 40, 109-128.
• 8.Doyle, R.D., Grodowitz M., Michael Smart R., Owens C., 2002, Impact of herbivory by Hydrellia pakistanae (Diptera: Ephydridae) on growth and photosynthetic potential of Hydrilla verticillata. Biocontrol, 24, 221-229.
• 9.Duarte C.M., 1991, Seagrass depth limits. Aquat. Bot., 40, 363-377.
• 10.Eriksson B.K., Sandström A., Isaeus M., Schreiber H., Karas P., 2004, Effects of boating activities on aquatic vegetation in the Stockholm archipelago, Baltic Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 61, 339-349.
• 11.Goldsborough W.J., Kemp W.M., 1988, Light Responses of a Submersed Macrophyte: Implications for Survival in Turbid Tidal Waters. Ecology, 69, 1775-1786.
• 12.Gutschick V., 1999, Biotic and abiotic consequences of differences in leaf structure. New Phytol., 143, 3-18.
• 13.Harley M.T., Findlay S., 1994, Photosynthesis-irradiance relationships for three species of submersed macrophytes in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Estuar. Coasts., 17, 200-205.
• 14.Krause-Jensen D., Sand-Jensen K., 1998, Light attenuation and photosynthesis of aquatic plant communities. Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 396-407.
• 15.Larcher W., 2003, Physiological plant ecology: ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups. Springer Verlag.
• 16.Madsen J.D., Hartleb C.F., Boylen C.W., 1991, Photosynthetic characteristics of Myriophyllum spicatum and six submersed aquatic macrophyte species native to Lake George, New York. Freshwater Biol., 26, 233-240.
• 17.Madsen J.D., Adams M.S., 1989, The light and temperature dependence of photosynthesis and respiration in Potamogeton pectinatus L. Aquat. Bot., 36, 23-31.
• 18.Markager S., Sand-Jensen K., 1994, The physiology and ecology of light-growth relationship in macroalgae. Phycol. Res., 10, 209-209.
• 19.Pilon J., Santamaría L., 2001, Seasonal acclimation in the photosynthetic and respiratory temperature responses of three submerged freshwater macrophyte species. New Phytol., 151, 659-670.
• 20.Pilon J., Santamaría L., 2002, Clonal variation in morphological and physiological responses to irradiance and photoperiod for the aquatic angiosperm Potamogeton pectinatus. J. Ecol., 90, 859-870.
• 21.Platt T., Gallegos C.L., Harrison W.G., 1980, Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages of marine phytoplankton. J. Mar. Res., 38, 687-701.
• 22.Rae R., Hanelt D., Hawes I., 2001, Sensitivity of freshwater macrophytes to UV radiation. Mar. Freshwater Res., 52, 1023-1032.
• 23.Sabbatini M.R., Murphy K.J., 1996, Response of Callitriche and Potamogeton to cutting, dredging and shade in English drainage channels. J. Aquat. Plant Manag., 34, 8-12.
• 24.Santamaría L., 2002, Why are most aquatic plants widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecol., 23, 137-154.
• 25.Santamaría L., van Vierssen W., 1997, Photosynthetic temperature responses of fresh-and brackish-water macrophytes: a review. Aquat. Bot., 58, 135-150.
• 26.Torres Boeger M.R.T., Poulson M.E., 2003, Morphological adaptations and photosynthetic rates of amphibious Veronica anagallis-aquatica L.(Scrophulariaceae) under different flow regimes. Aquat. Bot., 75, 123-135.
• 27.Tóth V.R., Herodek S., 2008, Seasonality of photosynthesis of Potamogeton perfoliatus in Lake Balaton. Hidrol. Kozl., 88, 215-218. (in Hungarian with Engl. summ.)
• 28.Tóth V.R., Herodek. S., 2009, A simple incubation tank for photosynthesis measurements with six light intensities. Ann. Limnol.- Int. J. Lim., 45, 195-202.
• 29.Tyler A.N., Sváb E., Preston T., Présing M., Kovács W.A., 2006, Remote sensing of the water quality of shallow lakes: A mixture modelling approach to quantifying phytoplankton in water characterized by high suspended sediment. Int. J. Remote Sens., 27, 1521-1537.
• 30.Vári, Á., Tóth, V. R., & Csontos, P., 2010, Comparing the morphology of Potamogeton perfoliatus L. along environmental gradients in Lake Balaton (Hungary). Ann. Limnol-Int. J. Lim., 46, 111-119.
• 31.Wells C.L., Pigliucci M., 2000, Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: the case of heterophylly in aquatic plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol., 3, 1-18.
• 32.Wolfer S.R., van Nes E.H., Straile D., 2006, Modelling the clonal growth of the rhizomatous macrophyte Potamogeton perfoliatus. Ecological Modelling., 192, 67-82.