Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Maintenance strategy development within SMEs: the development of an integrated approach

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Maintenance can play a key role in the long-term profitability of a company in the manufacturing sector, where it can have major impact on delivery, quality and cost. The importance of maintenance has increased, as high productivity and quality can be achieved by means of well-developed and organized maintenance strategies. However, this assumes that maintenance is controlled in such a way that equipment is stopped for maintenance via a systematic schedule. With the recent advances in technology many methodologies, tools, techniques and strategies have been developed and tested. The primary methodologies are Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) and Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM), with variations being developed to suit individual organisations. In general, there can be considerable benefits, but these are usually demonstrated in large organisations. Unfortunately, the majority of organisations are constrained by certain barriers, with the resulting loss of major benefits. These are usually the Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs). The paper identifies the barriers to the implementation of TPM within SMEs. Based upon our analysis a new maintenance methodology, the Advanced Integrated Maintenance Management System (AIMMS) is developed. AIMMS succeeds through focusing on specific maintenance tasks that will maximise gains based upon the inherent barriers within SMEs. To enable implementation, monitoring and evaluation of AIMMS, a computerized system Maintenance Management (MainMan) was developed and implemented within several of case study companies. The paper examines the implementation process in one of these companies. The results indicate that AIMMS supports strategic maintenance decisions, and helps increase equipment effectiveness by prioritizing equipment criticality and focusing on specific resources that will maximise gains based upon a return on investment.
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys.
  • Institute for Automotive and Manufacturing Advanced Practice, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sunderland, UK
  • AL-NAJJAR, B. (1996) Total Quality Maintenance. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2 (3)), 4-20.
  • BAGLEE, D., TRIMBLE, R. and MACINTYRE, J. (2003) An investigation into the perceived barriers to Total Productive Maintenance in small and medium enterprises. International Conference on Manufacturing Research, University of Strathclyde. Professional Engineering Publishing.
  • BAMBER, C.J., SHARP, J.M. and HIDES, M.T. (1999) Factors affecting successful implementation of TPM: A case study perspective. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 5 (3), 162-181.
  • BARNES, D. (2002) The complexities of the manufacturing strategy formation process in practice. Int. J. of Operations and Production Management 22 (10), 1090-1111.
  • BLANCHARD, B. (1997) An enhanced approach for implementing TPM in the manufacturing environment. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 3 (2), 69-80.
  • BOHORIS, G.A., VAMVALIS, C., TRACE, W. and IGNATIADOU, K. (1995) TPM implementation in Land-Rover with the assistance of a CMMS. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 1 (4), 3-16.
  • CHAN, F., LAU, F., CHAN, S. and KONG, S. (2005) Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance: A case study. Int. J. of Production Economics 95 (1), 71-94
  • CHOLASUKE, C.R., BHARDWA, R. and JIJU, A. (2004) The status of maintenance management in UK manufacturing organisations: results from a pilot survey. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 10 (1), 5-15.
  • COOKE, F.L. (2000) Implementing TPM in plant maintenance: Some organizational barriers. International J. of Quality & Reliability Management 17 (9), 1003-1016.
  • COOKE, F.L. (2003) Plant Maintenance strategy: evidence from four British manufacturing firms. Int. J. of Quality & Reliability Management 9 (3), 239-249.
  • FINLOW-BATES, T. and VISSER, B. (2000) An integrated approach to problem solving: linking TQM and RCA to TPM. The TQM Magazine 12 (4), 284-289.
  • HALL, P. (2002) Performance Measurement and the SME Sector. Institute of Operations Management Journal 28 (7), 20-21.
  • HANSSON, J. and BACKLUND, F. (2002) Managing commitment: increasing the odds for successful implementation of TQM, TPM or RCM. Int. J. of Quality and Reliability Management 20 (9), 993-1008.
  • KARDON, B. and FREDENDALL, L. (2002) Incorporating overall probability of system failure into preventive maintenance model for a serial system. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 8 (4), 1355-2511.
  • LAMBERT, S., DROLET, J. and ABDUL-NOUR, G. (1999) Mixed Production, Flexibility and SME. Computer and Industrial Engineering 37, 429-432.
  • LAWRENCE, J. (1999) Use Mathematical Modelling to give your TPM implementation effort an extra boost. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 5 (1), 62-69.
  • NAKAJIMA, S. (1988) Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance. Productivity Press, London.
  • PER HOKSTAD, J. and BODSBERG, L. (1996) An overall model for maintenance optimisation. Reliability Engineering and System, Safety 51, 241-257.
  • PERCY, D. and KOBBACY, B. (1997) Setting preventive maintenance schedules when data are sparse. Int. J. of Production Economics 51, 223-234.
  • SHERWIN, D. (2000) A review of overall models for maintenance management. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 6 (3), 138-164.
  • TSANG, A. (2002) Strategic dimensions of maintenance management. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 8 (1), 7-39.
  • WAEYENBERGH, G. and PINTELON, L. (2002) A framework for maintenance concept development. Int. J. of Production Economics 77, 299-313.
  • WANG, C. and HWANG, S. (2004) A stochastic maintenance management model with recovery factor. J. of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 10 (2), 154-164.
  • WIKLUND, H. and WIKLUND, P. (1999) A collaboration concept for TQM implementation in small and medium sized enterprises. Int. J. of Applied Quality Management 2 (1), 101-115.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.