Narzędzia help

Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
first last
cannonical link button

http://yadda.icm.edu.pl:80/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-a8fe8ef1-96de-4dc4-b30c-8b762419fce0

Czasopismo

Engineering Management in Production and Services

Tytuł artykułu

Modelling contractor’s bidding decision

Autorzy Biruk, S.  Jaśkowski, P.  Czarnigowska, A. 
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji EN
Abstrakty
EN The authors aim to provide a set of tools to facilitate the main stages of the competitive bidding process for construction contractors. These involve 1) deciding whether to bid, 2) calculating the total price, and 3) breaking down the total price into the items of the bill of quantities or the schedule of payments to optimise contractor cash flows. To define factors that affect the decision to bid, the authors rely upon literature on the subject and put forward that multi-criteria methods are applied to calculate a single measure of contract attractiveness (utility value). An attractive contract implies that the contractor is likely to offer a lower price to increase chances of winning the competition. The total bid price is thus to be interpolated between the lowest acceptable and the highest justifiable price based on the contract attractiveness. With the total bid price established, the next step is to split it between the items of the schedule of payments. A linear programming model is proposed for this purpose. The application of the models is illustrated with a numerical example. The model produces an economically justified bid price together with its breakdown, maintaining the logical proportion between unit prices of particular items of the schedule of payment. Contrary to most methods presented in the literature, the method does not focus on the trade-off between probability of winning and the price but is solely devoted to defining the most reasonable price under project-specific circumstances. The approach proposed in the paper promotes a systematic approach to real-life bidding problems. It integrates practices observed in operation of construction enterprises and uses directly available input. It may facilitate establishing the contractor’s in-house procedures and managerial decision support systems for the pricing process.
Słowa kluczowe
PL wspomaganie decyzji   polityka cenowa   przepływy pieniężne   programowanie liniowe  
EN decision support   decision to bid   pricing strategy   contractor cash flows   linear programming  
Wydawca Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
Czasopismo Engineering Management in Production and Services
Rocznik 2017
Tom Vol. 9, no. 1
Strony 64--73
Opis fizyczny Bibliogr. 37 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor Biruk, S.
  • Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Department of Construction Methods and Management, Poland, s.biruk@pollub.pl
autor Jaśkowski, P.
  • Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Department of Construction Methods and Management, Poland, p.jaskowski@pollub.pl
autor Czarnigowska, A.
  • Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Dpt. of Construction Methods and Management, Poland, a.czarnigowska@pollub.pl
Bibliografia
Ahmad, I., & Minkarah, I. (1988). Questionnaire survey on bidding in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 4(3), 229-243. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:3(229)
Bageis, S., & Fortune, C. (2009). Factors affecting the bid/ no bid decision in the Saudi Arabian construction contractors. Construction Management and Economics, 27, 53-71. doi: 10.1080/01446190802596220
Benjamin, N.B.H., & Meador, R.C. (1979). Comparison of Friedman and Gates competitive bidding models. ASCE Journal of the Construction Division, 105(1), 25-40.
Best, R.J. (1997). Market-Based Management Strategies for growing customer value and profitability. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.
Brook, M. (2011). Estimating and Tendering for Construction Work. 4th Ed. Abingdon, Great Britain: Spon Press.
Carr, R.I. (1982). General Bidding Model. Journal of the Construction Division, 108(4), 639-650.
Cartlidge, D. (2013). Estimator’s Pocket Book. Abingdon, Great Britain: Routledge.
Chua, D., & Li, D. (2000). Key Factors in Bid Reasoning Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(5), 349-357. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:5(349)
Cooper, R., & Slagmulder, R. (1997). Target Costing and Value Engineering. Portland-New Jersey, USA: Productivity Press.
Egemen, M., & Mohamed, A.N. (2008). SCBMD: A knowledge-based system software for strategically correct bid/no bid and mark-up size decisions. Automation in Construction, 17(7), 864-872. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.013
Friedman, L. (1956). A competitive bidding strategy. Operations Research, 4, 104-112.
Gates, M. (1967). Bidding strategies and probabilities. ASCE Journal of the Construction Division, 93(CO1), 75-107.
Hassanein, A.G. (1996). Factors affecting the bidding behaviour of contractors in Egypt. Building Research and Information, 24(4), 228-236. doi: 10.1080/09613219608727534
Hwang, J-S., & Kim, Y-S. (2016). A bid decision-making model in the initial bidding phase for overseas construction projects. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(4), 1189-1200. doi:10.1007/s12205-015-0760-y
Ioannou, P.G. (1988). Bidding models – symmetry and state of information. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(2), 214-232. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1988)114:2(214)
Kaka, A., Wong, C., Fortune, C., & Langford, D. (2008). Culture change through the use of appropriate pricing systems. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(1), 66-77. doi: 10.1108/09699980810842070
Köksalan, M.M., Wallenius, J., & Zionts, S. (2011). Multiple Criteria Decision Making: From Early History to the 21st Century. Singapore: World Scientific.
Kou, G., Ergu, D., Peng, Y., & Shi, Y. (2013). Data processing for the AHP/ANP. Series: Quantitative Management, Vol. 1, Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Leśniak, A., & Plebankiewicz, E. (2013). Overhead costs and profit calculation by Polish contractors. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(1), 141-161. doi:10.3846/20294913.2012.763008
Leśniak, A., & Plebankiewicz, E. (2015). Modeling the Decision-Making Process Concerning Participation in Construction Bidding. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(2). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000237
Li, H., & Love, P.E.D. (1999). Combining rule-based expert systems and artificial neural networks for mark-up estimation. Construction Management and Economics, 17, 169-76. doi: 10.1080/014461999371664
Lin, C-T., & Chen, Y-T. (2004). Bid/no-bid decision-making – a fuzzy linguistic approach. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 585-593. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.005
Lowe, D.J., & Parvar, J. (2004). A logistic regression approach to modelling the contractor’s decision to bid. Construction Management and Economics, 22(6), 643-653. doi: 10.1080/01446190310001649056
Mielec, A., Jaśkowski, P., & Biruk, S. (2009). Ustalenie wskaźnika narzutu zysku w strategii przetargowej przedsiębiorstwa budowlanego [Determining profit margins in bidding strategy of a construction enterprise]. Przegląd Budowlany, 6, 50-53.
Mochtar, K., & Arditi, D. (2000) Alternate pricing strategies in construction. Civil Engineering Dimension, 2(1), 56-64.
Moselhi, O., Hegazy, T., & Fazio, P. (1993). DBID: Analogybased DSS for bidding in construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(3), 466-470. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:3(466)
Potts, K. (2008). Construction Cost Management: Learning from Case Studies. Abingdon, Great Bitain: Taylor & Francis.
Saaty, T.L. (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
Shash, A.A. (1993). Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors. Construction Management and Economics, 11(2), 111-118. doi: 10.1080/01446199300000004.
Shokri-Ghasabeh, M., & Chileshe, N. (2016). Critical factors influencing the bid/no bid decision in the Australian construction industry. Construction Innovation, 2(16), 127-157. doi:10.1108/CI-04-2015-0021
Sobotka, A., & Czarnigowska, A. (2007). Target costing in public construction projects. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, 16-18 May, Vilnius, Lithuania. Retrieved from: http://leidykla.vgtu.lt/conferences/MBM_2007/2pdf/Sobotka_czarn.pdf
Stevens, M. (2012). The Construction MBA. Practical Approaches to Construction Contracting. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Tan, Y.-T., Shen, L.-Y., Langston, C., & Liu, Y. (2010). Construction project selection using fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(3), 302-315. doi: 10.1108/17465661011092669
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Boston, USA: Kluwer.
Wang, W.-C., Dzeng, R.-J., & Lu, Y.-H. (2007), Integration of Simulation-Based Cost Model and Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model for Bid Price Decisions. ComputerAided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22, 223-235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00480.x
Wanous, M., Boussabaine, A.H., & Lewis, J. (2000). To bid or not to bid: a parametric solution. Construction Management and Economics, 18(4), 457-466. doi: 10.1080/01446190050024879
Wanous, M., Boussabaine, A.H., & Lewis, J. (2003). A neural network bid/no bid model: the case for contractors in Syria. Construction Management and Economics, 21(7), 737-744. doi: 10.1080/0144619032 000093323
Uwagi
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).
Kolekcja BazTech
Identyfikator YADDA bwmeta1.element.baztech-a8fe8ef1-96de-4dc4-b30c-8b762419fce0
Identyfikatory
DOI 10.1515/jem-2017-0007