Year over year comparison of sediment quality in the rivers of Eastern Slovakia
Treść / Zawartość
Quality is one of the most important risk indicators in river basins. Therefore, monitoring and evaluating water and sediment quality has a very important role in process of risk management. The aim of the monitoring is provide for the sustainability of water bodies and these results are the basis for the risk management in the river catchment area. Hornad, Laborec and Poprad are the rivers in Eastern Slovakia. Hornad and Laborec belongs to basin of Danube and Poprad belongs to basin of Vistula. Sediment sampling was carried out according to ISO 5667-6. Monitoring was carried out in the spring on 2017–2018. The chemical composition of sediments was determined by means of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using SPECTRO iQ II (Ametek, Germany, 2000). The results of sediment quality evaluated by method PERI revealed that the quality of sediment in 2018 was better than 2017. Results of XRF analysis of sediments were compared with the limited values according to the Slovak Act 188/2003 Coll. of Laws on the application of treated sludge and bottom sediments to fields. It can be state that limit values comparing with Slovak legislation were not exceeding in all sediment samples in rivers in Eastern Slovakia. Based on the monitoring data of sediment quality in the study area, a quantitative analysis of heavy-metal pollution in sediment was conducted using the method of potential ecological risk index (PERI) which is method for evaluate the potential ecological risk of heavy metals. It is based exclusively on chemical parameters of sediments because sediment data show mean integrated values in time, with higher stability than water column parameters; sediments are easily sampled at field work; sediment samples are more representative for time and space scales and analytical data are easily obtained, especially because sediments present high concentrations of contaminants, decreasing the possible errors due to detection limits of the applied analytical method. This method comprehensively considers the synergy, toxic level, concentration of the heavy metals and ecological sensitivity of heavy metals. Potential ecological risk index can be obtained using three basic modules: degree of contamination (CD), toxic-response factor (TR) and potential ecological risk factor (ER). The results show on the basis on potential ecological risk index that the quality of sediment in 2018 is better than 2017. The worst result shows Hornad in 2017. Significant improvement occurred at the sampling point S2 in Hornad in 2018. The best results show Laborec in 2018. The results show on the basis on potential ecological risk index that quality of sediment in 2018 is better than 2017.
Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.
- Adaikpoh, E.O., Nwajei, G.E. & Ogala, J.E. (2005). Heavy metals concentrations in coal and sediments from river Ekulu in Enugu, Coal City of Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 9(3), 5-8.
- Akoto, O., Bruce, T.N. & Darko, G. (2008). Heavy metals pollution profiles in streams serving the Owabi reservoir. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2(11), 354-359.
- Bem, H., Gallorini, M., Rizzio, E. & Krzemin, S.M. (2003). Comparative studies on the concentrations of some elements in the urban air particulate matter in Lodz City of Poland and in Milan, Italy. Environmental International, 29(4), 423-428. doi 10.1016/S0160- 4120(02)00190-3
- Bird, G., Brewer, P., Macklin, M., Balteanu, D., Driga, B., Serban, M. & Zaharia, S. (2003). The solid state partitioning of contaminant metals and As in river channel sediments of the mining affected Tisa drainage basin, northwestern Romania and eastern Hungary. Applied Geochemistry, 18(10), 1583-1595.
- Cravotta, A.C. (2008). Dissolved metals and associated constituents in abandoned coal-mine discharges, Pennsylvania, USA. Part 1: constituent quantities and correlations. Applied Geochemistry, 23(2), 166-202.
- Hakanson, L. (1980). An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach. Water Research, 14(8), 975-1001.
- Hatje, V., Bidone, E.D. & Maddock, J.L. (1998). Estimation of the natural and anthropogenic components of heavy metal fluxes in fresh water Sinos river, Rio Grande do Sul state. South Brazil. Environmental Technology, 19(5), 483-487.
- ISO 5667-6-2005. Water quality. Sampling. Part 6: Guidance on sampling of rivers and streams.
- Karbassi, A.R., Monavari, S.M., Nabi Bidhendi, G.R., Nouri, J. & Nematpour, K. (2008). Metal pollution assessment of sediment and water in the Shur River. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 147(1-3), 107-116.
- Kraft, C., Tumpling, W. & Zachmann, D.W. (2006). The effects of mining in Northern Romania on the heavy metal distribution in sediments of the rivers Szamos and R. Reza; G. Singh Tisza (Hungary). Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologic, 34(3), 257-264.
- Macklin, M.G., Brewer, P.A., Balteanu, D., Coulthard, T.J., Driga, B., Howard, A.J. & Zaharia, S. (2003). The long term fate and environmental significance of contaminant metals released by the January and March 2000 mining tailings dam failure in Maramures County, upper Tisa basin, Romania. Applied Geochemistry, 18(2), 241-257.
- Mohanty, J.K., Misra, S.K. & Nayak, B.B. (2001). Sequential leaching of trace elements in coal: a case study from Talcher coalfield, Orissa. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 58(5), 441-447.
- Nabholz, J.V. (1991). Environmental hazard and risk assessment under the United States Toxic Substances Control. Science of the Total Environment, 109, 649-665.
- Nouri, J., Mahvi, A.H., Jahed, G.R. & Babaei, A.A. (2008). Regional distribution pattern of groundwater heavy metals resulting from agricultural activities. Environmental Geology, 55(6), 1337-1343.
- Ondruš, Š. (1991). Ešte raz o pôvode tatranskej rieky Poprad [Once again about the origin of Tatra River Poprad]. Bratislava: Veda, Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied.
- Ouay, F., Pelfrene, A., Planque, J., Fourrier, H., Richard, A., Roussel, H. & Girondelot, B. (2013). Assessment of potential health risk for inhabitants living near a former lead smelter. Part 1: metal concentrations in soils, agricultural crops, and home-grown vegetables. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 185(5), 3665-3680.
- Shahtaheri, S.J., Abdollahi, M., Golbabaei, F., Rahimi- Froshani, A. & Ghamari, F. (2008). Monitoring of mandelic acid as a biomarker of environmental and occupational exposures to styrene. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2(2), 169-176.
- Singh, A.K., Mondal, G.C., Kumar, S., Singh, T.B., Tewary, B.K. & Sinha, A. (2008). Major ion chemistry, weathering processes and water quality assessment in upper catchment of Damodar River basin, India. Environmental Geology, 54(4), 745-758.
- Singh, A., Sharma, R.K., Agrawal, M. & Marshall, F.M. (2010). Health risk assessment of heavy metals via dietary intake of foodstuffs from the wastewater irrigated site of a dry tropical area of India. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48(2), 611-619.
- Slovak Act. No 188/2003 Coll. of Laws on the application of treated sludge and bottom sediments to fields.
- Slovak Environmental Agency [SEA] (2015). Introduction. Pilot Project PiP1: Hornád/ /Hernád, Integrated Revitalisation of the Hornád/Hernád River Valley. Banská Bystrica: Slovak Environmental Agency.
- United States Environmental Protection Association [US EPA] (1998). Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Washington, DC: US EPA.
- Venugopal, T., Giridharan, L. & Jayaprakash, M. (2009). Characterization and risk assessment studies of bed sediments of River Adyar-An application of speciation study. International Journal of Environmental Research, 3(4), 581-598.
- Wong, C.S.C., Li, X.D., Zhang, G., Qi, S.H. & Peng, X.Z. (2003). Atmospheric deposition of heavy metals in the Pearl River Delta, China. Atmospheric Environment, 37(6), 767-776.